Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Risk Expert Nassim Taleb: GMOs Could Destroy the Global Ecosystem
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/03/taleb-shreds-gmos.html
Risk Expert: GMOs Could Destroy the Global Ecosystem
Posted on March 26, 2014
Black Swan Author Nassim Nicholas Taleb Demolishes the Claim that GMOs Are Low-Risk
Risk analyst Nassim Nicholas Taleb predicted the 2008 financial crisis, by pointing out that commonly-used risk models were wrong. Distinguished professor of risk engineering at New York University, author of best-sellers The Black Swan and Fooled by Randomness, Taleb became financially independent after the crash of 1987, and wealthy during the 2008 financial crisis.
Now, Taleb is using his statistical risk acumen to take on genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
Talebs conclusion: GMOs could cause an irreversible termination of life at some scale, which could be the planet.
<snip>
Taleb and his 2 co-authors write in a new draft paper:
Taleb shreds GMO-boosters including biologists who dont understand basic statistics:
<snip>
Taleb debunks other pro-GMO claims as well, such as:
1. The Risk of Famine If We Dont Use GMOs. Taleb says:
In addition, the United Nations actually says that small organic farms are the only way to feed the world.
2. Nothing Is Totally Safe, So Should We Discard All Technology? Taleb says this is an anti-scientific argument. Some risks are small, or are only risks to one individual or a small group of people. When youre talking about risks which could wipe out all life on Earth, its a totally different analysis.
3. Assuming that Nature Is Always Good Is Anti-Scientific. Taleb says that statistical risk analysis dont use assumptions such as nature is good or bad. Rather, it looks at the statistical evidence that things persist in nature for thousands of years if they are robust and anti-fragile. Ecosystems break down if they become unstable.
GMO engineers may be smart in their field, but they are ignorant when it comes to long-run ecological reality:
<snip>
Risk Expert: GMOs Could Destroy the Global Ecosystem
Posted on March 26, 2014
Black Swan Author Nassim Nicholas Taleb Demolishes the Claim that GMOs Are Low-Risk
Risk analyst Nassim Nicholas Taleb predicted the 2008 financial crisis, by pointing out that commonly-used risk models were wrong. Distinguished professor of risk engineering at New York University, author of best-sellers The Black Swan and Fooled by Randomness, Taleb became financially independent after the crash of 1987, and wealthy during the 2008 financial crisis.
Now, Taleb is using his statistical risk acumen to take on genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
Talebs conclusion: GMOs could cause an irreversible termination of life at some scale, which could be the planet.
<snip>
Taleb and his 2 co-authors write in a new draft paper:
For nature, the ruin is ecocide: an irreversible termination of life at some scale, which could be the planet.
***
Genetically Modified Organisms, GMOs fall squarely under (the precautionary principle, i.e. the rule that we should err on the side of caution if something is really dangerous) not because of the harm to the consumer because of their systemic risk on the system.
Top-down modifications to the system (through GMOs) are categorically and statistically different from bottom up ones (regular farming, progressive tinkering with crops, etc.) There is no comparison between the tinkering of selective breeding and the top-down engineering of arbitrarily taking a gene from an organism and putting it into another. Saying that such a product is natural misses the statistical process by which things become natural. (i.e. evolving over thousands of years in a natural ecosystem, or at least breeding over several generations.)
What people miss is that the modification of crops impacts everyone and exports the error from the local to the global. I do not wish to payor have my descendants payfor errors by executives of Monsanto. We should exert the precautionary principle thereour non-naive versionsimply because we would only discover errors after considerable and irreversible environmental damage.
Taleb shreds GMO-boosters including biologists who dont understand basic statistics:
Calling the GMO approach scientific betrays a very poorindeed warpedunderstanding of probabilistic payoffs and risk management.
***
It became popular to claim irrationality for GMO and other skepticism on the part of the general public not realizing that there is in fact an expert problem and such skepticism is healthy and even necessary for survival. For instance, in The Rational Animal, the author pathologize people for not accepting GMOs although the World Health Organization has never found evidence of ill effects a standard confusion of evidence of absence and absence of evidence. Such a pathologizing is similar to behavioral researchers labeling hyperbolic discounting as irrational when in fact it is largely the researcher who has a very narrow model and richer models make the irrationality go away).
<snip>
Taleb debunks other pro-GMO claims as well, such as:
1. The Risk of Famine If We Dont Use GMOs. Taleb says:
Invoking the risk of famine as an alternative to GMOs is a deceitful strategy, no different from urging people to play Russian roulette in order to get out of poverty.
And calling the GMO approach scientific betrays a very poorindeed warpedunderstanding of probabilistic payoffs and risk management.
In addition, the United Nations actually says that small organic farms are the only way to feed the world.
2. Nothing Is Totally Safe, So Should We Discard All Technology? Taleb says this is an anti-scientific argument. Some risks are small, or are only risks to one individual or a small group of people. When youre talking about risks which could wipe out all life on Earth, its a totally different analysis.
3. Assuming that Nature Is Always Good Is Anti-Scientific. Taleb says that statistical risk analysis dont use assumptions such as nature is good or bad. Rather, it looks at the statistical evidence that things persist in nature for thousands of years if they are robust and anti-fragile. Ecosystems break down if they become unstable.
GMO engineers may be smart in their field, but they are ignorant when it comes to long-run ecological reality:
We are not saying nature is the smartest possible, we are saying that time is smarter than GMO engineers. Plain statistical significance.
<snip>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 16305 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Risk Expert Nassim Taleb: GMOs Could Destroy the Global Ecosystem (Original Post)
bananas
Mar 2014
OP
UN Report Says Small-Scale Organic Farming Only Way to Feed the World: "Wake Up Before It's Too Late
bananas
Mar 2014
#2
Everything domestic, crops and livestock, came from the wild. We don't know what we're messing
brewens
Mar 2014
#4
they're called "nozzleheads"--not just mere hard-sell guys but truest believers,
MisterP
Mar 2014
#7
bananas
(27,509 posts)1. Motley Fool: "Renowned Expert: GMOs Pose More Risk Than We Think"
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/03/05/renowned-expert-gmos-pose-more-risk-than-we-think.aspx
Renowned Expert: GMOs Pose More Risk Than We Think
We've been thinking about this risk all wrong.
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have the ability to cause "an irreversible termination of life at some scale, which could be the planet."
This warning, as emotional and overstated as it sounds, isn't coming from some anti-science zealot or conspiracy theorist.
It is, instead, coming from Nassim Taleb, distinguished professor of risk engineering at New York University, author of best-sellers The Black Swan and Fooled by Randomness, and shrewd investor who made a fortune when "black swans" like September 11 and the Great Recession occurred.
Recently, he's been making his feelings on GMOs crystal clear: they're dangerous to the overall health of our planet. In a paper that's available to the public, yet still in draft form, Taleb -- along with two colleagues -- lay out their case.
<snip>
The focus ... should be on the fact that the "total ecocide barrier" is bound to be hit, over a long enough time, with even incredibly small odds. Taleb includes a similar graph in his work, but no breakdown of the actual variables at play.
As Taleb says, "Over time, something bound to hit the (ecocide) barrier is about guaranteed to hit it."
<snip>
Renowned Expert: GMOs Pose More Risk Than We Think
We've been thinking about this risk all wrong.
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have the ability to cause "an irreversible termination of life at some scale, which could be the planet."
This warning, as emotional and overstated as it sounds, isn't coming from some anti-science zealot or conspiracy theorist.
It is, instead, coming from Nassim Taleb, distinguished professor of risk engineering at New York University, author of best-sellers The Black Swan and Fooled by Randomness, and shrewd investor who made a fortune when "black swans" like September 11 and the Great Recession occurred.
Recently, he's been making his feelings on GMOs crystal clear: they're dangerous to the overall health of our planet. In a paper that's available to the public, yet still in draft form, Taleb -- along with two colleagues -- lay out their case.
<snip>
The focus ... should be on the fact that the "total ecocide barrier" is bound to be hit, over a long enough time, with even incredibly small odds. Taleb includes a similar graph in his work, but no breakdown of the actual variables at play.
As Taleb says, "Over time, something bound to hit the (ecocide) barrier is about guaranteed to hit it."
<snip>
bananas
(27,509 posts)2. UN Report Says Small-Scale Organic Farming Only Way to Feed the World: "Wake Up Before It's Too Late
http://www.technologywater.com/post/69995394390/un-report-says-small-scale-organic-farming-only-way-to
UN Report Says Small-Scale Organic Farming Only Way to Feed the World
Nick Meyer, December 14, 2013
Even as the United States government continues to push for the use of more chemically-intensive and corporate-dominated farming methods such as GMOs and monoculture-based crops, the United Nations is once against sounding the alarm about the urgent need to return to (and develop) a more sustainable, natural and organic system.
That was the key point of a new publication from the UN Commission on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) titled Trade and Environment Review 2013: Wake Up Before Its Too Late, which included contributions from more than 60 experts around the world.
The cover of the report looks like that of a blockbuster documentary or Hollywood movie, and the dramatic nature of the title cannot be understated: The time is now to switch back to our natural farming roots.
<snip>
The findings on the report seem to echo those of a December 2010 UN Report in many ways, one that essentially said organic and small-scale farming is the answer for feeding the world, not GMOs and monocultures.
<snip>
UN Report Says Small-Scale Organic Farming Only Way to Feed the World
Nick Meyer, December 14, 2013
Even as the United States government continues to push for the use of more chemically-intensive and corporate-dominated farming methods such as GMOs and monoculture-based crops, the United Nations is once against sounding the alarm about the urgent need to return to (and develop) a more sustainable, natural and organic system.
That was the key point of a new publication from the UN Commission on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) titled Trade and Environment Review 2013: Wake Up Before Its Too Late, which included contributions from more than 60 experts around the world.
The cover of the report looks like that of a blockbuster documentary or Hollywood movie, and the dramatic nature of the title cannot be understated: The time is now to switch back to our natural farming roots.
<snip>
The findings on the report seem to echo those of a December 2010 UN Report in many ways, one that essentially said organic and small-scale farming is the answer for feeding the world, not GMOs and monocultures.
<snip>
BanzaiBonnie
(3,621 posts)3. Thank you for posting
This is important to understanding about food security... which we don't have right now.
brewens
(13,557 posts)4. Everything domestic, crops and livestock, came from the wild. We don't know what we're messing
with. Add that to killing off the oceans and it's big trouble. I'll be out of here before we see all that probably but we owe it to our kids to stop it.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)5. More.
https://twitter.com/nntaleb
Nassim N. Taleb @nntaleb Mar 20
Never never never never never never never never never compromise with BS.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d538a45a-4871-11e2-a1c0-00144feab49a.html
Never never never never never never never never never compromise with BS.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d538a45a-4871-11e2-a1c0-00144feab49a.html
Nassim N. Taleb @nntaleb Mar 20
Our precautionary principle has been updated to reflect the pathologizing of people who are skeptical about GMOs
http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/pp2.pdf
Our precautionary principle has been updated to reflect the pathologizing of people who are skeptical about GMOs
http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/pp2.pdf
Nassim N. Taleb @nntaleb Mar 19
GMOs will eventually go bust for economic reasons; what angers me is the stupidity of "scientists" ignorant of probability & complex systems
GMOs will eventually go bust for economic reasons; what angers me is the stupidity of "scientists" ignorant of probability & complex systems
Nassim N. Taleb @nntaleb Mar 19
Time is wiser than humans.
Time is wiser than humans.
Nassim N. Taleb @nntaleb Mar 18
My point is that nature takes ZERO systemic risk from plants. Not small, ZERO.
My point is that nature takes ZERO systemic risk from plants. Not small, ZERO.
Nassim N. Taleb @nntaleb Mar 18
An island would convince "scientists" into thinking in terms of complex systems, not parts.
An island would convince "scientists" into thinking in terms of complex systems, not parts.
Nassim N. Taleb @nntaleb Mar 18
All I need to get you to do is admit that there are *systemic* tail risks we don't understand.
All I need to get you to do is admit that there are *systemic* tail risks we don't understand.
Nassim N. Taleb @nntaleb Mar 12
Thank you Twitter! With 60K (# doubling every 6 m) no more journos, media, & BS vendors w/distortions &framing. Cut intermediary! (revised)
Thank you Twitter! With 60K (# doubling every 6 m) no more journos, media, & BS vendors w/distortions &framing. Cut intermediary! (revised)
Nassim N. Taleb @nntaleb Mar 11
For citizens, the 1st amndmnt is tool to reveal truths;for journos, it is a pretext to sell voyeurism, & invade lives
For citizens, the 1st amndmnt is tool to reveal truths;for journos, it is a pretext to sell voyeurism, & invade lives
Orrex
(63,185 posts)9. In other words, Taleb agrees with himself many times over.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)6. The 1% kills off the 99% (or most of the 99%, anyway)
MisterP
(23,730 posts)7. they're called "nozzleheads"--not just mere hard-sell guys but truest believers,
preachers of technocracy, Wellsian kingpriests in all-white clerical robes
Orrex
(63,185 posts)8. This draft paper has been submitted for peer review, yes?
And it's been published, yes?
Please provide citations in addition to links to the paper itself.