Carbon Delirium: Shooting Up on Big Energy
Last edited Tue Apr 1, 2014, 02:09 PM - Edit history (1)
by Michael T. Klare
Of all the preposterous, irresponsible headlines that have appeared on the front page of the New York Times in recent years, few have exceeded the inanity of this one from early March: U.S. Hopes Boom in Natural Gas Can Curb Putin. The article by normally reliable reporters Coral Davenport and Steven Erlanger suggested that, by sending our surplus natural gas to Europe and Ukraine in the form of liquefied natural gas (LNG), the United States could help reduce the regions heavy reliance on Russian gas and thereby stiffen its resistance to Vladimir Putins aggressive behavior.
Forget that the United States currently lacks a capacity to export LNG to Europe, and will not be able to do so on a significant scale until the 2020s. Forget that Ukraine lacks any LNG receiving facilities and is unlikely to acquire any, as its only coastline is on the Black Sea, in areas dominated by Russian speakers with loyalties to Moscow. Forget as well that any future U.S. exports will be funneled into the international marketplace, and so will favor sales to Asia where gas prices are 50% higher than in Europe. Just focus on the articles central reportorial flaw: it fails to identify a single reason why future American LNG exports (which could wind up anywhere) would have any influence whatsoever on the Russian presidents behavior.
The only way to understand the strangeness of this is to assume that the editors of the Times, like senior politicians in both parties, have become so intoxicated by the idea of an American surge in oil and gas production that they have lost their senses.
As domestic output of oil and gas has increased in recent years -- largely through the use of fracking to exploit hitherto impenetrable shale deposits -- many policymakers have concluded that the United States is better positioned to throw its weight around in the world. Increasing U.S. energy supplies, said then-presidential security adviser Tom Donilon in April 2013, affords us a stronger hand in pursuing and implementing our international security goals. Leaders in Congress on both sides of the aisle have voiced similar views.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/04/01-4