Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The military-takeout complex: An interview with Conflict Kitchen
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/christina-turner/2014/04/military-takeout-complex-interview-conflict-kitchenThe military-takeout complex: An interview with Conflict Kitchen
Conflict Kitchen is a restaurant in Pittsburgh that only serves food from countries the U.S. is in conflict with. Founded by artists Jon Rubin and Dawn Weleski in 2010, so far Conflict Kitchen has served up takeout dishes from Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea and now Afghanistan. I caught up with Jon Rubin by phone to talk about the restaurant that married food with politics.
Christina Turner: Where did the idea for Conflict Kitchen come from?
Jon Rubin: The project came about because of what we felt was absent from the landscape in Pittsburgh, specifically the lack of cultural and ethnic diversity within the city. Oftentimes, one of the ways in which communities and expats introduce themselves into an American city is by opening restaurants. We're a small city and the population of expats from Afghanistan or Venezuela or Cuba that are living in Pittsburgh is very small, so it's not likely that they're going to open restaurants. So what we thought is that we could open those restaurants and use them as an opportunity to not only bring that cuisine to the culture of the city, but also to start a very specific conversation about politics and conflict that is particular to U.S. relations worldwide.
We recognized that food was a very basic device that appeals to a broad range of people regardless of ideology, and that by functioning as a restaurant we were capable of engaging people who might not come, say, to an academic conference or a political rally or a cultural discussion group. Then we have the capacity once they arrive to present them with information that is more than the food itself. So that seems to be a really interesting bait and switch device that we're capable of employing. The core mission of our project is to have a space in our city that's open for political discussions and catalyzes curiosity about countries and people who live very far away.
CT: Why conflict, though? If your goal is cultural diversity, then why enlist conflict as a criterion for your restaurant?
JR: We start from a crisis point. Some conflicts are more obvious than others. In Afghanistan, for instance, we obviously still have military troops. A crisis point is any point in which we're sending over troops or we're engaged in covert, or even overt, actions within a country. It's a symptom of something that has gone wrong between the United States and that country. It's looking at this symptom as a starting point, but what happens is that's usually the end point for most discussions that you might see in the media.
We're interested in asking: what's the culture that lies beneath this crisis? What are the dynamics that we might not be aware of, whether it's how people are living in Afghanistan and what the impact of our presence there has created in the minds of Afghans, or what Afghans say here in the United States think about the U.S. involvement there. And what is the historical and contemporary culture that we might be engaged with? When we [the U.S.] go and take actions abroad the ramifications of those actions play out against the context of the culture of that country before we even arrive. Oftentimes, I think folks in the US don't know that context so they see our actions in isolation. Sometimes you frankly don't know the cuisines from that part of the world. How does that start a story of place that is not just based on an American perspective?
Conflict Kitchen is a restaurant in Pittsburgh that only serves food from countries the U.S. is in conflict with. Founded by artists Jon Rubin and Dawn Weleski in 2010, so far Conflict Kitchen has served up takeout dishes from Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea and now Afghanistan. I caught up with Jon Rubin by phone to talk about the restaurant that married food with politics.
Christina Turner: Where did the idea for Conflict Kitchen come from?
Jon Rubin: The project came about because of what we felt was absent from the landscape in Pittsburgh, specifically the lack of cultural and ethnic diversity within the city. Oftentimes, one of the ways in which communities and expats introduce themselves into an American city is by opening restaurants. We're a small city and the population of expats from Afghanistan or Venezuela or Cuba that are living in Pittsburgh is very small, so it's not likely that they're going to open restaurants. So what we thought is that we could open those restaurants and use them as an opportunity to not only bring that cuisine to the culture of the city, but also to start a very specific conversation about politics and conflict that is particular to U.S. relations worldwide.
We recognized that food was a very basic device that appeals to a broad range of people regardless of ideology, and that by functioning as a restaurant we were capable of engaging people who might not come, say, to an academic conference or a political rally or a cultural discussion group. Then we have the capacity once they arrive to present them with information that is more than the food itself. So that seems to be a really interesting bait and switch device that we're capable of employing. The core mission of our project is to have a space in our city that's open for political discussions and catalyzes curiosity about countries and people who live very far away.
CT: Why conflict, though? If your goal is cultural diversity, then why enlist conflict as a criterion for your restaurant?
JR: We start from a crisis point. Some conflicts are more obvious than others. In Afghanistan, for instance, we obviously still have military troops. A crisis point is any point in which we're sending over troops or we're engaged in covert, or even overt, actions within a country. It's a symptom of something that has gone wrong between the United States and that country. It's looking at this symptom as a starting point, but what happens is that's usually the end point for most discussions that you might see in the media.
We're interested in asking: what's the culture that lies beneath this crisis? What are the dynamics that we might not be aware of, whether it's how people are living in Afghanistan and what the impact of our presence there has created in the minds of Afghans, or what Afghans say here in the United States think about the U.S. involvement there. And what is the historical and contemporary culture that we might be engaged with? When we [the U.S.] go and take actions abroad the ramifications of those actions play out against the context of the culture of that country before we even arrive. Oftentimes, I think folks in the US don't know that context so they see our actions in isolation. Sometimes you frankly don't know the cuisines from that part of the world. How does that start a story of place that is not just based on an American perspective?
(more at the link.)
An interesting concept, I think.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 892 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The military-takeout complex: An interview with Conflict Kitchen (Original Post)
Ken Burch
Apr 2014
OP
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)1. This also, from the same piece:
CT: Your next version will be Palestine, coming up next fall. Tell me about what you have planned for that?
JR: I'm Jewish -- I'm a non-observant Jew -- so I've grown up with a narrative around Israel and Palestine and Palestinians. We are [located] nearby a very large Jewish community. I've had some casual conversations with people that have lead me to believe that they're not entirely comfortable with us presenting a more nuanced, humanitarian perspective on the Palestinian people. That said, we actually have a lot of Jewish food that has a kind of European, Middle Eastern background to it that people are already eating. So the food might be more familiar to a larger population here.
We're also interested in hearing different viewpoints. Now when we're going [to Palestine], we're going to be hanging out, almost exclusively, with Palestinians. Our goal is not necessarily to get the Jewish perspective. I think the Jewish perspective is well represented globally and in our community. One of the issues people will say is, well, we're not in conflict with Palestinians. Or, there is no such thing as Palestine. There's no country named Palestine. Those are really two very interesting questions that may be the starting point for people.
I think it's pretty clear [the U.S. is] the primary supporter of the State of Israel, and that Israel is in very serious long-term conflict with the Palestinian people. It's very hard to say that we're not in either direct or proxy conflict with Palestinian people. But I think even those very basic questions are a good starting point for a kind of curiosity for our customers -- something that might lead to a conversation that they might not normally be having.
JR: I'm Jewish -- I'm a non-observant Jew -- so I've grown up with a narrative around Israel and Palestine and Palestinians. We are [located] nearby a very large Jewish community. I've had some casual conversations with people that have lead me to believe that they're not entirely comfortable with us presenting a more nuanced, humanitarian perspective on the Palestinian people. That said, we actually have a lot of Jewish food that has a kind of European, Middle Eastern background to it that people are already eating. So the food might be more familiar to a larger population here.
We're also interested in hearing different viewpoints. Now when we're going [to Palestine], we're going to be hanging out, almost exclusively, with Palestinians. Our goal is not necessarily to get the Jewish perspective. I think the Jewish perspective is well represented globally and in our community. One of the issues people will say is, well, we're not in conflict with Palestinians. Or, there is no such thing as Palestine. There's no country named Palestine. Those are really two very interesting questions that may be the starting point for people.
I think it's pretty clear [the U.S. is] the primary supporter of the State of Israel, and that Israel is in very serious long-term conflict with the Palestinian people. It's very hard to say that we're not in either direct or proxy conflict with Palestinian people. But I think even those very basic questions are a good starting point for a kind of curiosity for our customers -- something that might lead to a conversation that they might not normally be having.