An IT worker writes: 'Emotionally, we are broken'
April 25, 2014 11:39 AM EDT
Training your replacement must be an awful experience. Its bad enough to lose a job. Its an entirely different thing when you believe that U.S. government H-1B policies are assisting in the transfer of your job overseas.
Training your replacement must take enormous inner reserve.
Theres an IT professional who, at this moment, is training offshore replacements, the people who are taking over the work. This IT pro is also a good writer, and has penned a short explanation about what life is now like.
The name, employer, and everything else will remain anonymous.
The IT worker writes:
Letter here: http://blogs.computerworld.com/it-outsourcing/23833/it-worker-writes-emotionally-we-are-broken
Xipe Totec
(43,889 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,889 posts)Any company that's pulling these kinds of shenanigans is not a company worth working for.
I ended up in a much better position after it was all over.
It is a painful experience when it happens and I feel sympathy for anybody who has to go through it.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I think you can still accept support for what you went through.
I know it's painful. A relative over 50 went through it. Over a year out of work. Almost lost his modest home, his wife and his son over it. And his emotional-wellbeing.
Now works two jobs and his wife who is very smart, but has a heavy accent and not much work experience, has to work in a laundromat, washing and folding, on her feet all day. No benefits whatever and she has to beg for a day off.
They still can't refinance the home, though, even though they missed only one payment one time. Therefore have been paying ridiculous interest at pre-2008 rates, while everyone else has been paying ridiculously low rates for years. He also had a mild stroke and had to pay for most of it because he was carrying only bare bones health insurance--and barely able to afford that. Can't win for losing.
Considers himself lucky though that they are working and have held onto to their little ranch home.
Did I mention he has a great mind, a great work ethic, a graduate degree and years of highly rated experience in his field?
Yeah, I know. He should have tried getting a license to drive a truck. He probably would have, if he and his wife didn't get anything. I just hope he stays healthy and employed until he hits retirement.
whathehell
(29,050 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,889 posts)Chinese replacements. In Beijing.
Sadly for them, it didn't work out nearly as well as they anticipated and they had to shut down the Beijing office two years after I left.
I cried all the way to the bank.
whathehell
(29,050 posts)You "cried all the way to the bank"?...Are you saying you made money off the Beijing office closing?
Xipe Totec
(43,889 posts)Six months severance plus I was forced to exercise stock options I would otherwise have held on to. If I had stayed, I would have kept the stock options as their value continued to decline. As it was, I found a job one month later with a 15% raise. In combination I made twice as much money that year than I would have normally made if I had kept my job.
That's what I mean by crying all the way to the bank.
If I had refused, I'm sure they would have found some convenient excuse to let me go earlier and without a severance package.
whathehell
(29,050 posts)but it still sucks that they had the balls to make you train "replacements".
Xipe Totec
(43,889 posts)I lay the blame at the feet of the corporation; a large DSP manufacturer.
The Chinese replacements were actually decent human beings trying to make a living and help their own families. They were as much pawns of geopolitical forces as I was. I actually made friends with some of them.
They are as much a part of the 99% as we are.
whathehell
(29,050 posts)the Chinese or the people of any other nation to whom corporations "outsource".
I blame the corporations, but I blame the government more...America used to have something
called "tariffs" which made it unprofitable for companies & manufacturers looking for cheap labor
overseas. If they made products abroad, they had a nice, big tax levied on the products they
then tried to sell here. Now that's decried as "protectionism" as if protecting your own industries
and workers was a bad thing. You may not be old enough to remember when it was actually MORE expensive
to buy foreign goods than domestic ones, but having been born in 1950, I'm not.
Imposing tariffs on foreign goods was routine American policy for most of its history, starting right after
the Revolution. It's something Thom Hartmann talks about a lot.
Xipe Totec
(43,889 posts)To make legal what they wanted to do to begin with.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Looking at my annual income, if I replace the Bush years with a straight line before/after, I'm missing over $120,000...
ChromeFoundry
(3,270 posts)They server the interests of corporations, not citizens.
Our congressional leadership gets a nice chunk of change from:
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg;
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates;
Microsoft former-CEO Steve Ballmer;
Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith,
LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman;
Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt;
Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer;
Dropbox CEO Drew Houston;
Tim Armstrong, CEO and Chairman, AOL, Inc.
Steve Chen, Co-founder, YouTube
Chris Cox, Vice President of Product, Facebook;
Reed Hastings, Founder and CEO, Netflix;
Kevin Systrom, CEO and Co-Founder, Instagram;
Padmasree Warrior, Chief Technology & Strategy Officer, Cisco;
Ron Conway, Special Advisor, SV Angel;
Sean Parker, Managing Partner, The Founders Fund;
Chamath Palihapitiya of the Social+Capital Partnership VC fund;
Joe Green, co-founder of the Causes Facebook app;
Jim Breyer of the Accel Partners VC fund;
Matt Cohler of the Benchmark VC fund;
John Doerr and Mary Meeker of the Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers VC fund;
Paul Graham, co-founder of the Y Combinator seed capital firm;
PayPal co-founder Max Levchin;
Aditya Agarwal, vice presient of engineering at Dropbox;
Ruchi Sanghvi, a former Facebook engineer who started a company later acquired by Dropbox.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Ever.
The admin just worries about the INS, border security, etc.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)the President."
merrily
(45,251 posts)Don't think the signature line would make a bit of difference, though.
Just a wild guess.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)mentioned the President. Doesn't matter.
And I doubt the signature line would make a difference.
ChromeFoundry
(3,270 posts)They don't want to be involved unless it gives a good appearance and will drive up their approval ratings.
They are not clueless on how the program helps corporations profit and improve their personal portfolios.
merrily
(45,251 posts)the impact of the program?
It's such common knowledge and it's been an object of discussion since at least the Clinton admin, if not before.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that more people chasing a finite number of jobs is going to put Americans out of work and also likely lower wages.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)safe-guard American jobs. These job shifts benefit Corp-America (the big donors) at the expense of American workers.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 25, 2014, 07:54 PM - Edit history (1)
he meant, "These are not jobs that Americans want to do at the wages employers prefer to pay."
Supply and demand. Drive up the supply of workers, drive down the supply of jobs. Then sit back and see how little you have to pay and how badly you can treat them. And, unions? Don't make me laugh.
The fast food industry employees finally got tired of it and led the charge. Good for them.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)If you let your guard down here for just one second, you get found out.
(Your dry humor is highly enjoyable.)
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)I wasnt smart enough to catch it. Enlighten me, if you will.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I was going on about how they think. I don't think you will find a more pro-worker poster. I just assumed you were joking. That is not usually my first reaction, either.
When I first saw your post, my total reply was going to be "More like John L. Lewis," but I could not remember his first name. All that was coming to me was Richard Lewis. I knew that was so wrong and didn't feel like googling.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Fast food industry employees.
If it had been there when you read the post, I think my intent would have been clearer.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)satirical and I love laughing, so it all worked out.
whathehell
(29,050 posts)and I've heard Obama question, more than once, the wisdom of sending foreign students
graduating from our schools back home.
Answer: Um, so there might be some jobs for AMERICANS?...
In a time of recession, especially, this policy SUCKS!
merrily
(45,251 posts)economy. (Must have been a year ago when I heard him.)
If I study in Paris on my own dime, would Paris be unwise if I return home to the US?
Sure, if we are giving them scholarships, it might be unwise, but, then, I'd ask, why are we giving them scholarships to begin with?
I realize we give some isolated scholarships for humanitarian reasons or wider scholarships because we are investing in a nation. In the latter case, though, the whole point is to have the students return to their native land to help build it. Obama's biological father was himself part of that kind of program and he returned to Kenya.
Maybe POTUS Obama gave more of an explanation on other occasions but he did not offer them when I heard him and I could only shudder.
It's about many workers competing for few jobs to drive down salaries and drive up worker productivity because people are desperate for jobs and afraid to lose one if they were lucky enough to get it. It's also about workers from third world countries tending to be willing to take jobs for less American dollars than would an American. It's about workers way too scared to unionize or demand things from employers. It's about taking from workers any shred of backbone or bargaining power
Unless, as I said, someone has another explanation. And it's not that no Americans are skilled enough for the jobs. That is rw bs.
whathehell
(29,050 posts)and that's what this country seems to have become -- just a bunch of "merchants", just another "market"
We citizens who fight the wars and pay the taxes get shit -- No loyalty, no gratitude, no nothing.
I'm truly disgusted.
merrily
(45,251 posts)"Merchants have no country" or "The merchant has no country."
We citizens and taxpayers who are not in the top 10% of the wealthy don't get an excellent return on our taxes, I will agree to that extent. We do get some things. Lots of job opportunities are not currently among those things, though.
First, a lot of jobs "ran" South to get away from union friendly states. Then they "ran" overseas to get away from paying American workers a living wage and things like having to provide a safe workplace, like U.S. child labor laws, etc. They begrudge every penny paid in US taxes, too. And among those who made those kinds of decisions about their country and their fellow Americans are also among those who engage in the most jingoism.
whathehell
(29,050 posts)"We citizens and taxpayers who are not in the top 10% of the wealthy don't get an excellent return on our taxes, I will agree to that extent. We do get some things. Lots of job opportunities are not currently among those things, though
What kinds of things do you think we get, and how valuable are they if they don't include a way to make a living?
I agree with you on the economic traitors and their jingoism.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)My husband's been in the field (40 years) to have known people who that happened to YEARS ago.
Skittles
(153,138 posts)I've heard about it many, many times
Treant
(1,968 posts)is incompetent after they've let you go?
Priceless. Even more priceless was advising that your consulting rate for them was $2,000 an hour, 10 hours due in advance, non-refundable.
Skittles
(153,138 posts)they can still be clueless after FIVE YEARS
they have so much turnover because, well, THEY HAVE OPPORTUNITIES
sometimes when I'm asked why a situation is so fubar all I have to say is ONE word: OFFSHORE
It boggles the mind, but the number of competent offshore hires or offshore projects has been exactly zero.
How is it saving money to do something three times for half the price each time?
Skittles
(153,138 posts)for example, problems that used to be fixed in 15 or 20 minutes - now it can take hours and that is the new norm
merrily
(45,251 posts)Corruption Inc
(1,568 posts)Either that or "fictitious".
ChromeFoundry
(3,270 posts)are you somewhat anonymous on DU?
I don't think that means you are a fictitious person or in a state of being involved with any wrongdoing... but maybe I'm wrong.
pa28
(6,145 posts)This program has turned into just another way to systematically rob American workers of a secure job and line the pockets of corporate megadonors.
As long as the public is willing to accept the absence of a social contract the screwing will continue.
merrily
(45,251 posts)SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)I have been in IT my entire life. Jobs are very hard to come by now a days. Over the past 7 years I have seen up's and down's like you wouldn't believe. I have been unemployed more than employed. Finding full time work with benefits is extremely difficult. Add to the fact that I'm 58 makes it even harder.All that's out there is contract work. Once the contract is over, you're toast, and have to start over, sometimes taking months to find your next gig. I have been without work now for 9 months, looking hard as hell every day. The only thing that has saved me(us) is that my wife works, but she wants to retire and get out of the rat race. She is older than I am. Then out of the clear blue, a friend from 15 years ago, reached out to me, found me a job, and I landed a 6 month gig, with the possibility of going full time after that. I am so grateful that this happened. If I go full time, my wife can retire. Lord only knows what would have happened if this wasn't to be. Believe me, it's very tough out there. The economy is a long way from recovering.
merrily
(45,251 posts)It's great that you got the temporary position. Hoping with all my heart that it goes permanent, even before the six months are up.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)....and make it seem fairer. You can even hybridize it into a kind of social/democracy with a Capitalism Cherry on top, but this behavior is inherent in the beast. It's made this way and it is only doing what it is designed to do: ''Make the most profits possible irrespective of anything or anyone else.''
This demonstrates quite clearly that Capitalism has run its course. And so we can expect to see more and more of this. When TPP passes it'll get even worse. And once the Internets and Net Neutrality are dead concepts, we will be theirs for the taking.
- That is, if we don't stop it.
K&R
Together, the major shareholders and the board, thirty to forty people, make all of the decisive decisions in a corporation: What the company will produce, how, where, and, finally, what to do with the profit the enterprise generates. The vast majority of workers in a capitalist enterprise are required to live with the results of all of the decisions that are made by a tiny minority.
Q: Whats the alternative?
A cooperative enterprise is the key alternative to a traditional capitalist enterprise. All the workers, whatever they do inside an enterprise, have to be able to participate in collectively arriving at the decisions about what, how, where to produce, and what to do with the profits in a democratic way. One person, one vote should decide how these things are done.
The reason why were interested in making a transition from the top-down capitalist organization of enterprises to a radically different cooperative or democratic organization is simple: We believe the capitalist organization of production has now finished its period of usefulness in human history. It is now no longer able to deliver the goods.
Its bringing profits and prosperity to a tiny portion of the population, and delivering not the goods but the bads to most people. Jobs are steadily more insecure, unemployment is high and lastingly high, benefits are increasingly being reduced, and the prospects for our children are even worse, as more of them go deeper and deeper in debt to get the degrees that do not provide them with the jobs and incomes to get out of that debt.
The crisis we endure is the product of an economic system whose organization is something we should question, debate, and change.
~Richard Wolff, Professor Emeritus, UMass link
merrily
(45,251 posts)We personify corporations, saying they are greedy. But, no, they aren't. The people who run them, on the other hand.....
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)- To change direction you must first think of it.......
We have to fight our own acquisitive nature.
Media focus on celebrities and lifestyles of the rich and famous is not helping. Shows about very expensive homes, very expensive hotels, very expensive fashion, etc. Hours of broadcasting before award shows showing designer clothes, shows and jewels. It's approaching cult worship of costly things and those who can acquire as much as they want of them without blinking.
'
mikeysnot
(4,756 posts)we were losing the contract but did not know it yet, I picked up on it, the manager for the firm didn't realize she was letting the cat out of the bag.
I had to do a bunch of recording training sessions for processes and procedures in front of a live online audience.
The manager did not know "how or what" was being done, so when I asked them to outline what they need for each session, I did just that. And only that.
So there were massive holes of information in the sessions. They got no extras, no explanations and no details. I gave them what they asked for. I know that these tutorial vid's would be of no help to anyone that did not know the system to begin with....
When the contract renewal* time came up and they were forced not to sign with us it made sense why I made the videos, even though I knew but didn't know for sure.
I waited a while and dropped her a line, since I did 100% of all the jobs for their 18 channels for 5 years prior and see if they needed any help. I knew them inside and out. She seemed interested and it got to pay. She asked if I can do templates for them because the firm they have now was struggling.... gee I wonder why?
So she asks if I could do it for 15 bucks.... I was like thinking in my head, "ok maybe I can turn these out just for easy cash...." SO I say 15 bucks an hour.... No for the whole job... pause. silence...
These templates from construction to means testing to approval can take just for me 2-3 hours of time for one.... so in a sense I would be working for them for 5-7 dollars an hour. I politely declined.
Where was the company located. India.
* We did not lose the client, another company that we worked together with told them to go with their firm for our services or they would drop them... The company could not afford to lose them so we went. This was our companies major cash cow and it alone covered our operating costs, etc. Our company did not last long after that.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)We were a small company with only a couple of large contracts, so we were very attentive to adding all sorts of specializations to our systems as the clients brought new needs to us. But then one of the companies decided they *had* to have a core functionality change that essentially forced us to rewrite more than half of the software we'd spent almost a decade developing at that point, and wanted a freakishly short deadline that didn't let us adequately test the changes, as well as forcing us to be far less responsive to the needs of the other large client and the smaller ones at the same time that the other client wanted us to start integrating our system with another outfit they felt did nicer front-ends. Then the first organization had a management change, and the new people didn't want to learn our systems, and instead spent something like 4-5 times as much as ours buying the systems they were used to from another company that had far less functionality.
We never really recovered and finally the boss simply washed his hands of the mess, selling the rights to use and modify our code to the remaining client while they supposedly worked to switch over to something else. Years later, they were still using our system, having blown past their own deadlines for switching because they simply didn't realize you couldn't just create so much functionality overnight on a shoestring.
mikeysnot
(4,756 posts)are making decisions it is always a disaster...
The Stranger
(11,297 posts)It is multi-national corporations and their 1% that is doing this.
Hoi polloi is being brainwashed into hating the government.
Meanwhile, hiding behind the curtain pulling the strings are the Kochs, the 1% and Big Corp.
merrily
(45,251 posts)It has plenty. Corporations don't enact immigration laws.
Not only that, but go ahead, blame it all on corporations and exonerate the people whose votes you put in office and whose salaries you pay to represent your interests and to legislate and regulate in your interests. Now what? You own enough shares in a multinational corporation to direct policy or fire the board of directors? If so, God Bless. But even then, don't forget your legislative enablers.
The Stranger
(11,297 posts)But the 1% have so craftily and intentionally set up the government as the cover for their massive appropriation of the people's wealth that we must constantly beware of this ruse, and even more constantly try to awaken those who have fallen into it.
merrily
(45,251 posts)the 1% to set them up. They are well-compensated adults, not little kids or robots. They have the choice to legislate on behalf of the 100%, just as they supposed to.
And, on the federal level, at a minimum, many of them ARE in the 1%. There is a reason that Bernie Sanders didn't get rich after hitting D.C. and so many others did. Not to mention that a lot of them arrived as members of the 1%.
You can't pressure your Rep or Senator very much on your own, but get a group together and you just might. Though they have little to fear, since voted out means only that they get a very well paying, and still powerful job as a lobbyist or a member of a think tank.
Look at Dodd. Head of the motion picture association? Really? What was his great qualification to head that, other than his contacts in federal government?
On the other hand, even boycotts, assuming we had the wherewithal to organize a large one, would not hurt the Koch's. Their billions much earned more while I was typing this than some busboy earns all year.
I guess we just see this very differently.
shawn703
(2,702 posts)I can honestly say I have never seen this happen, at any company I have worked for. It's hard enough to find people with the necessary skills in the first place, including the communication skills that most H-1B workers would lack.
The part where I think a lot of people fall down in this field is not understanding that you will need to keep up with advances in technology. I know cloud engineers are in pretty high demand at the moment. It might not be that way in ten years, but in ten years another IT skill will be in pretty high demand.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)don't want to actively take the time to train their own employees in what they want. They only want to hire people who magically already fulfill some need, then keep them working on that aging need without bothering to retrain them in newer needs because they know they can find someone cheaper who is being trained on someone else's dime to come in and do the next job that needs done.
It's more profitable in the short term to simply squeeze what you can out of workers and discard them.
shawn703
(2,702 posts)In my 17 years an employer has sent me to technical training twice. Self study is the only really reliable way to learn something new, and IT workers should plan on continuously studying pretty much their entire career.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Recently, I'm getting people with very thick accents. I grew up listening to thick accents all around me, but I am having trouble understanding this batch.
Not only that but the Comcast reps are operating either from home or from an incredibly noisy place. Yelling and clatter in the background on both occasions I called recently, one of which was to get support on my broadband connection.
This is offshoring, not HB 1, but it is in reaction to your comment on communication skills. For some purposes, employers seem more than willing to risk it.
antigop
(12,778 posts)....
Asked by Marketos Fernandez about how she would deal with the shortage of H-1B visas, which tech companies rely in to bring in non-U.S. workers such as computer engineers, she suggested thinking longer term and working with colleges using cash from Silicon Valley to train people in the U.S. to fill those jobs, while in the shorter term pressing for more H-1B visas.
I wonder how much they paid her for that speech.
djean111
(14,255 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Or posters whose bread is buttered on the center right side, one way or another.
Some of the things I see on this board are so over the top, I have to believe that someone's ability to feed his or her kids is involved somehow.
Don't mind feeding kids in the least, but crikey, if it's anything short of that, I'd be surprised.
ETA: Until recently, I would see posts like this one from one side or the other, and think. "I wish they'd stop posting about each other and stick to the issues."
Now, I get it.
I get it.
I get it.
antigop
(12,778 posts)"They're obviously defensive about it," observed Lee, who has taken part in such meetings.
Clinton declined repeated requests for an interview about her views on outsourcing. Her campaign advisers, however, say she believes there are no inconsistencies in the comments she has made here and in India or in her actions as a senator.
They say she opposes legislative measures -- such as trade barriers -- to slow the loss of American jobs if they would restrain free trade. And they say she has supported the expansion of the temporary-worker visas because U.S. technology companies have repeatedly told her the visas are needed to maintain a ready workforce.
At the same time, they say, she has worked hard to secure money to assist workers who have lost jobs to outsourcing and wants to retrain the American workforce to compete better in the global marketplace.
I'm still waiting for her to tell us what, exactly, laid off engineers and IT people are supposed to train for.
djean111
(14,255 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Makes it clearer that the job is leaving the country, so I like it better.
An older woman was telling me about her daughter, who had been unemployed for a long time and unable to find work. I responded that I hoped her daughter was making good use of the time, such as geting training. The woman put me right in my place.
"Please, people train for one kind of work after another that disappears or becomes obsolete. I remember when employers used to provide new employees with on the job training, while they were getting paid. Whatever happened to that?"
And they say she has supported the expansion of the temporary-worker visas because U.S. technology companies have repeatedly told her the visas are needed to maintain a ready workforce.
Are we supposed to believe that Hillary actually believes the companies when they allegedly tell her that? I guess she has to say something.
The positions of the unions would weigh heavily with Democrats, especially when they coincide with the positions of big business. The Clinton Morris dream scenario.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)It's all Congress's fault
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)then why the hell should anyone believe that there is any reason for the visas than to replace Americans with cheaper foreigners?
A) the people doing the training can already do the work, and B) other Americans could just as easily be trained to do the work.
In the first year or two I worked as a DBA/programmer, the small start-up company I worked for started getting emails from overseas programming companies trying to sell the boss on replacing me with their coders. In the 12 or so years I worked for him, even though my salary went up quite a bit, I never actually got to the point where the foreign offers from the first few years were lower than what I was paid the entire time I was there... According to industry standards, at my highest, I think I made something like 1/3 of what the 'average' coder of my experience and skillset did
merrily
(45,251 posts)The rest of the jobs Americans are not skilled enough to do.
What a bunch of slackers and incompetents we are! Geez. No wonder the country has been on the ropes. Once again, we have met the enemy and he is us.
I hope politicians, big business and lobbyists will all forgive me for unjustly blaming them for so long.
ETA
Brigid
(17,621 posts)I think I know, but I want to see if I'm right.
antigop
(12,778 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Exactly what they had in mind when this started.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)riqster
(13,986 posts)Sorry to hear it's hitting the Federal workforce as well.
Blue Owl
(50,325 posts)n/t
ticktockman
(69 posts)Look at the first graph and first table at http://econdataus.com/h1binfo.htm and the four articles linked to after that table and you'll see a large portion of H-1Bs go to outsourcing firms. The last article shows that those firms tend to hire many more lower-skilled workers (such as bachelor degrees) than major tech companies. Regarding H-1B workers going on to get green cards, it says the following:
The analysis looked at the five major recruiters of guest workers in the industry -- Microsoft, Intel Corp. (NASDAQ:INTC), Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) and Qualcomm (NASDAQ:QCOM) -- and found that between 2010 and 2012, an average of 65 percent of guest workers at these companies were given green cards. The percentage of guest workers who came to the U.S. through outplacement companies was much lower, between zero and 12 percent depending on the firm.
Hence, large portions, if not a large majority, of H-1B visa workers do not become citizens. If you look at http://econdataus.com/svworkers.html , you'll see that about half of the software developers in Silicon Valley are non-citizens (a proxy for H-1B workers), about a quarter are naturalized citizens, and about a quarter are citizens by birth. Hence, H-1B visa workers are being used for run-of-the-mill programming jobs, not just for jobs requiring specialized knowledge.
As far as what the government could do, they could put a limit on the percentage of H-1B workers per company. Then companies would likely use more of their allotment to truly obtain special talent and not just engage in an arms race for cheap labor. Companies should still have to justify the H-1Bs but, as the articles state, companies have found many ways to get around those rules. I suspect that this problem may not get addressed until the CEO jobs start getting outsourced via strong foreign firms that start eating the lunch of our big companies like Microsoft and Facebook. Then, rather than calling for more H-1B visas, the successors of Bill Gates and Zuckerberg will likely start calling for government intervention and that all of us Americans, management and workers alike, pull together as a team. Their money will buy support in Washington and then something will get done. I only hope that we don't have to wait that long.