Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Mon May 26, 2014, 02:30 PM May 2014

Is Putin Right to Call Monsanto a Terrorist Organization and Ban GMOs?

Sometime before wrestling bears and after hunting tigers, Russian President Vladimir Putin found a few minutes to denounce the use of genetically modified crops (again). While Russia was widely believed to allow the use of biotech crops shortly after joining the World Trade Organization, the country believes it has found a way to remain GMO-free without violating its obligations as a member nation. A new bill introduced to the Russian parliament would treat producers of biotech crops from companies such as Monsanto (NYSE: MON ) , The Dow Chemical Company (NYSE: DOW ) , and Syngenta (NYSE: SYT ) as criminals -- with fines comparable to terrorism. As co-author of the bill Kirill Cherkasov told RT:



When a terrorist act is committed, only several people are usually hurt. But GMOs may hurt dozens and hundreds. The consequences are much worse. And punishment should be proportionate to the crime.


If the proposed bill becomes law, punishment could range from 15 years to life. That seems a bit harsh to me and, when coupled with numerous anti-science quotes and ideologies from the bill and its supporters, I just don't see how a policy could be sustainable scientifically or economically (what Russia really cares about) speaking. Additionally, most crops grown in Russia today (wheat, barley, sunflower, oats, potatoes) don't have GM varieties. That's good news for Monsanto and Syngenta shareholders, but Russia claims that it can grow enough organic food to never need biotech crops. Are those bold claims actually true?

Can Russia farm without engineered crops?

Russia is free to ban biotech crops, but it should do so with more accurately worded proposals. I'd start by scrapping the proposed bill or amending it to a point where it is generally unrecognizable from its initial submission. Then, Russia should insert language that speaks to (1) its concerns that GMOs are not sufficiently tested and (2) its belief that organic farming practices can sustain the country on their own.

more...

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/05/25/is-putin-right-to-call-monsanto-a-terrorist-organi.aspx
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is Putin Right to Call Monsanto a Terrorist Organization and Ban GMOs? (Original Post) Purveyor May 2014 OP
Yup AceAcme May 2014 #1
Pretty much. nt bemildred May 2014 #2
I don't think so. JoeyT May 2014 #3
We need a new term for it. But they should be banned throughout the world newthinking May 2014 #4
Yep... awoke_in_2003 May 2014 #5
Since they've been terrorizing small farmers for decades now..... wolfie001 May 2014 #6
Monsanto terrorized Percy Schmeiser. roody May 2014 #7
In the strictest sense of the word, no, but we get the point. Nevertheles . . . Jack Rabbit May 2014 #8
Those bastards will put that in their advertising. santamargarita May 2014 #9
But they want to keep the GMOs a secret. roody May 2014 #11
In a word dipsydoodle May 2014 #10
 

AceAcme

(93 posts)
1. Yup
Mon May 26, 2014, 02:43 PM
May 2014

He is resisting Food Fascism, Inc. and its degenerate consequences. At least Pooty Poot is doing one thing right to protect the human beings.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
3. I don't think so.
Mon May 26, 2014, 06:07 PM
May 2014

The definition of terrorism is watered down enough as it is. Monsanto is an awful company, but what they do isn't terrorism.

To use the Bhopal disaster as an example, since Dow is mentioned too: Terrorists couldn't have hoped to cause that much death and destruction in their wildest dreams, but it still wasn't terrorism, because that death and destruction wasn't specifically done to deliver a political message, intimidate, or destabilize. It was willful criminal negligence to the point heads should have rolled, probably literally, over it, and a certain company should've definitely had their assets seized and sold off to pay for it, but it wasn't intentional. Intent is what makes terrorism.

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
4. We need a new term for it. But they should be banned throughout the world
Mon May 26, 2014, 07:37 PM
May 2014

Not just for their products, but for the way they do business and are attempting to monopolize the worlds seed stocks.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
8. In the strictest sense of the word, no, but we get the point. Nevertheles . . .
Tue May 27, 2014, 10:54 AM
May 2014

I wouldn't take anything Putin says seriously. He's a demagogue, first, last and always. He sees some advantage in this that will enhance his power in the long run. The thing that gets him to stand up to Monsanto today is the same thing that has him bashing gays, murdering Chechens and promoting civil unrest in Ukraine. If there were any benefit to him to embracing Frankenfood, he'll sing a different tune tomorrow.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Is Putin Right to Call Mo...