Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Does US Senate Commit Treason with NDAA Bill? By Jeanine Molloff
http://www.nationofchange.org/does-us-senate-commit-treason-ndaa-bill-1327245191December 1st, 2011, the US Senate accomplished the unthinkablewith the nearly unanimous passage of the National Defense Authorization Bill of 2012they committed treason. Written and planned in secret by the Senate Armed Services Committee, the newly minted NDAA contains three sections which collectively sanctions indefinite detention of alleged terrorists or terrorist sympathizersanywhere in the world including the US and designates the military the duty to arrest, imprison and interrogate without benefit of counsel, accused civilians here on Main Street. Ironically, the abuse of civilian Iraqis by our military and by military contractors is coming to a locale near you. Theoretically, armed squads of US soldiers might be knocking on your door in the dead of night to take away Auntie Mame for her alleged terrorist activitiesat the ACLU. This bill potentially allows for the blatant political prosecutions of any dissenter using the military as a bully club to instill deep fear in any who dare to question our governments motives.
No proof of wrongdoing is required and those accused are denied the due process right of trial by their peers, or the services of an attorney and are subsequently relegated to the military commissions justice system. As a resultthe accused are reduced to the status of unlawful enemy combatant, and are subject to the following actions: extroardinary rendition, enhanced interrogation procedures, indefinite detention to possibly a life sentence, and presidential assigned extermination of target . These powers are then given to the President to use at will, fully codified in law,while requiring in reality no proof other than presidential whim.
It is at this juncture that I find the timing of this bill suspiciouscoinciding with the exponential growth of the Occupy Wall Street Movement, the recent implosion of both EU and US economies, the emerging body of proof documenting Wall Streets enormous crimes, and the Super Committee threat to cut military funding. It almost looks like the robber barons of Wall Street circling the wagons in a fit of legislative revenge against the rabble, namely you and I.
History of NDAA 2012 Sections 1031, 1032, and 1033-35 another AUMF
This bill was co- written by the powerful Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee Senator Carl Levin (D) and the Senate Minority Leader John McCain, with Senator Lindsey Graham assigning himself as main cheerleader. The deliberations were kept secret and any debate was forbidden. Crafted under the auspices of keeping our nation safe from terrorismthe entire world including the US is now classified as a battlefield with indefinite timelines. Anyone broaching the question of due process rights is shouted down as soft on terrorismmainly by Senator Graham. In fact, here is an example of how Senator Graham views the issues of due process rights:
If youre an American citizen and you betray your country, youre going to be questioned about what you know,
and youre not going to be given a lawyer if our national security interests dictate that you not be given a lawyer and go into the criminal justice system, because were not fighting crime, were fighting a war.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 821 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post