Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Right Wing Paranoia (Original Post) zebonaut Mar 2013 OP
Crazier than shit house rats! rdharma Mar 2013 #1
More than that, they want to be RIGHT! louis-t Mar 2013 #2
Preparedness v. Paranoia padruig Mar 2013 #3
Too true on all counts kenfrequed Mar 2013 #5
How about the concept of cooperation? zebonaut Mar 2013 #4
 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
1. Crazier than shit house rats!
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 05:10 PM
Mar 2013

And they're hoping and praying for the Apocalypse.

If there's no Apocalypse, then they've just wasted all that time, money, and effort for nothing

padruig

(133 posts)
3. Preparedness v. Paranoia
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 05:34 PM
Mar 2013

I'm a First Responder and there is a huge difference between preparedness and paranoia, unfortunately the series that NatGeo has been showing lately is a perfect example of how stark that difference can be.

The programs place an undue emphasis on self-protection by booby traps and firearms. In one episode, the 'prepper' (their term, not mine) had selectively poisoned the food stocks they had stored, and only they knew which food stocks were contaminated.

These folks have bought off on the idea that if there is a large scale natural or man-made disaster that they will be on their own entirely.

The reality is quite a bit different.

I live in a high-impact seismic risk zone and the State is now pushing the model that anyone living here should have 4 to 6 weeks of food and water. (FEMA recommends 72 hours but that recommendation does come with some caveats.)

The people depicted in these shows do not realize that in the time of a disaster, declared or otherwise, protecting their life and property while on their property will likely go unchallenged. But the moment they step off their property, they will fall under Federal jurisdiction and can have their firearms confiscated and they can be either detained or arrested.

In a disaster, anyone carrying a gun has to have a badge, if you don't have a badge, you'll be treated as a looter or a vigilante.

Most gun owners do not realize that concealed carrying can be hazardous to your health. If you were to be injured in a car accident, have a seizure or a heart attack, when the EMT's arrive and see the firearm, they will back away and call for Law Enforcement to come in and secure the weapon before treatment begins.



kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
5. Too true on all counts
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 05:32 PM
Mar 2013

If you are called to a medical emergency you have to stop and wonder whether the person with the firearm present caused the emergency.

 

zebonaut

(3,688 posts)
4. How about the concept of cooperation?
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 09:47 PM
Mar 2013

In any disaster; people should and will cooperate; share water; help with the heavy lifting...
Its a much better and saner model. People working together will forge solutions; these freaks will only cause damage and death

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Right Wing Paranoia