Bill Maher & Alexandra Pelosi: Republicans Want Spending Cuts But Can’t Name One. (VIDEO)
= new reply since forum marked as read
I love how "Lame Talking Points" Feehery tries to "get ya" with the "and your taxes went up...."
No one ever points out that the rich people during those OUTRAGEOUSLY high 
Clinton taxes were rich then. That in the 50's and 60's and 70's when taxes were much higher than even during Clinton's terms, almost all of the families wealthy now were wealthy then. You'd think that a 40% tax bracket is gonna leave these rich folks destitute and living in a cardboard box.
And America is not going to go broke. It's not now and if it does in the future, it's because it didn't collect enough revenue.
Most of the articles there support improvement of Head Start which the article you link to does as well. It also cites an article cowritten by Isabel Sawhill who is at Brookings. If the quality and effectiveness of Head Start are to be upgraded, the programs must be critically evaluated. That will certainly hurt the feelings of some and be applauded by others.
Which study or evaluation do you believe is suspect? I have no idea what the Heritage Foundation's position is. I would guess that if they have similar findings, they would reach a different solution than Brookings, not improvement, but across the board defunding or outright dissolution.
Personally, I believe Head Start should enroll children younger than three, and be required and funded to allow for quality day care. The organizations who receive the Head Start grants must have their programs carefully evaluated. Defending them for what good they do bring is not enough. The results are not where they need to be. Anyway, the right will target Head Start for not being cost effective or, if Head Start does succeed consistently, they will say we don't need it. You just have to love how predictable they are.
I think we agree that the communities and families that Head Start serves need more, purposefully targeted, interventions than just day care and Head Start. It just isn't enough.
Early childhood education needs a makeover, especially in poverty stricken areas.
http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2010/10/11-head-start-haskins
"A new approach is needed. One that has been suggested- defunding these programs-would amount to giving up the fight against major social problems such as educational failure and poverty that damage millions of American lives. A far better alternative is to use rigorous evidence about "what works" to evolve Head Start and other federal efforts into truly effective programs over time, and to use sophisticated models to trace their longer-term effects on children's life prospects.
This approach draws on the insight that most of these programs are actually broad funding streams that finance multiple models and strategies ("interventions"
. Although evaluations may show that the program as a whole has little or no positive effect, certain specific interventions within it may indeed be effective. An example of this in preschool education is Project Upgrade, a Miami-Dade County, Fla., initiative that trained teachers of low-income preschoolers in language and literacy instruction. Its interventions were shown in a large randomized evaluation to increase the development of children's vocabulary and early reading skills by four to nine months over the course of a single school year, compared with the control group.
Other, nonpreschool examples of research-proven interventions include career academies in low-income high schools (shown to produce a long-term increase in earnings averaging $2,200 per year); the Success for All whole-school reform in grades K-2 (shown to increase schoolwide reading ability in 2nd grade by 25 percent to 30 percent of a grade level); the Nurse-Family Partnership, which provides nurse-visitation services to low-income first-time mothers (shown to produce sustained reductions of nearly 50 percent in child abuse and neglect); and the Carrera Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Program (shown to produce 40 percent to 50 percent reductions in teenage girls' pregnancies and births).
Such instances of proven effectiveness are rare, in part because rigorous evaluations are still uncommon in most areas of social policy, including education. But their very existence suggests that evidence-based reforms in Head Start and other federal social programs could help them evolve to become much more effective."
This is a link to some other articles.
http://www.brookings.edu/research/commentary?start=1&expert=Ron+Haskins&sort=ContentDate&topic=Head+Start
