Video & Multimedia

Galraedia

(5,022 posts) Thu Sep 26, 2013, 08:09 PM Sep 2013

Rachel Maddow - GOP returns to government shutdown agenda

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rachel Maddow - GOP returns to government shutdown agenda (Original Post) Galraedia Sep 2013 OP

It is time to refer to Senator Ted Cruz as the, Texas Republican Senator from Canada-Ted Cruz. DhhD Sep 2013 #1

the real reason the GOP hates the ACA! BillyRibs Sep 2013 #2

Thanks shubham Sep 2013 #3

I don't understand. You say the government hasn't been shut down for the past few years? tclambert Sep 2013 #4

Yes exactly. Its because of the black dude who.... Left Coast2020 Sep 2013 #5

DhhD

(4,695 posts)

1. It is time to refer to Senator Ted Cruz as the, Texas Republican Senator from Canada-Ted Cruz.

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Thu Sep 26, 2013, 10:29 PM

Sep 2013

Ted Cruz is a Canadian Citizen and was born there.

BillyRibs

(787 posts)

2. the real reason the GOP hates the ACA!

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Thu Sep 26, 2013, 10:40 PM

Sep 2013

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023732473

shubham

(30 posts)

3. Thanks

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Fri Sep 27, 2013, 02:26 AM

Sep 2013

Nice sharing,Thanks for share with us.

tclambert

(11,085 posts)

4. I don't understand. You say the government hasn't been shut down for the past few years?

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Fri Sep 27, 2013, 07:15 AM

Sep 2013

I thought Congress shut down almost as soon as the black guy got elected.

Left Coast2020

(2,397 posts)

5. Yes exactly. Its because of the black dude who....

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Sat Sep 28, 2013, 11:59 AM

Sep 2013

..is doing what hasn't been done in 50 years: create an "Improved National Healthcare System".

Because of that accomplishment, independent voters and women will come in droves to the polls and throw out as many repukes as possible in the House next year.

We only need 16-17 seats to change the Speaker. If women show up, repukes are out.

Reply to this discussion