Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Galraedia

(5,022 posts) Fri Nov 22, 2013, 11:53 AM Nov 2013

Rachel Maddow - GOP obstruction sparks nuclear reaction

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rachel Maddow - GOP obstruction sparks nuclear reaction (Original Post) Galraedia Nov 2013 OP

I'd like a clean version (jpegs) of the graphs in that story. n/t SpankMe Nov 2013 #1

Loved this segment. It exposed so many RW lies being yelled out there. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #2

Beautifully crafted piece. Connects the dots, includes many relevant facts (including .... Scuba Nov 2013 #3

We should push the President to do ALL 93 vacancies Left Coast2020 Nov 2013 #4

SpankMe

(2,957 posts)

1. I'd like a clean version (jpegs) of the graphs in that story. n/t

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Fri Nov 22, 2013, 12:21 PM

Nov 2013

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)

2. Loved this segment. It exposed so many RW lies being yelled out there.

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Fri Nov 22, 2013, 12:32 PM

Nov 2013

Scuba

(53,475 posts)

3. Beautifully crafted piece. Connects the dots, includes many relevant facts (including ....

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Fri Nov 22, 2013, 12:59 PM

Nov 2013

... several that were new to me) and provides an excellent lesson on this historical event.

Great job by Rachel, as always.

Left Coast2020

(2,397 posts)

4. We should push the President to do ALL 93 vacancies

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Fri Nov 22, 2013, 03:11 PM

Nov 2013

And I hope a majority of them are in the South where the white wing surpresses the votes, womens right to choice, and other related nazi-like tactics.

Reply to this discussion