Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
2. The biggest real value to them was the anonymity aspect
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 03:57 PM
Nov 2013

The fad caught on because you could buy drugs online with them. Now that the feds are on to it this is becoming quite problematic and some bitcoin exchanges are being required to collect personal info. Some have also lost millions to hackers.

I don't look for the fad to last. If I had any significant investment in them I'd be selling.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
4. I'm not ready to write this off...
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 04:57 PM
Nov 2013

Which one of these are more credible or less extinguishable?

1) The United States continuing to print money with nothing to back the dollar

2) An accountable system based on rare numbers that have specific value

 

Veilex

(1,555 posts)
5. I see this an awful lot... so I'd like to try to dispel it a bit:
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 01:54 AM
Dec 2013

"The United States continuing to print money with nothing to back the dollar"
I'm mostly concerned with the "With nothing to back the dollar" aspect of the statement.
The Dollar is backed by the country's credit... which is in turn backed by a continual show
of ability to pay our debts, one way or another. Add to that, the actual value of federal holdings
to include buildings and land and the dollar is actually heavily backed.

I realize people usually mean "backed by gold"... but in this case, trust (which should probably be read as "credit&quot
is as good as gold.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
6. So when the Chinese cash in their $ trillion in Treasuries
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 07:04 AM
Dec 2013

we'll just sign over the Treasury Building to them, maybe throw in a couple of national parks, and call it even?

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
7. … and to finish your very accurate point...
Sun Dec 1, 2013, 01:47 PM
Dec 2013

… this means that the dollar is backed by the United States military industry, a.k.a., war machine.

The country's ability to pay our debts has and will forever be committed to the biggest portion of our budget, which is defense.

The gold standard would have been better, though I'm not sure how much better, in this age. Bitcoins are tied to a "thing" that is demonstrated to have a finite value towards goods and services, in an expanding base.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Will Bitcoin Replace the ...