Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
1. "Now is time to put Planet before profits."
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 01:27 PM
Jan 2014

Truer words were never spoken. I want that slogan on my next bumper-sticker (that and "To Hell With TPP!&quot .

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
2. Elect Senator Bernie Sanders as POTUS!!
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 01:32 PM
Jan 2014

One thing Obama has shown all of us...it's not just "rich, old, white men" who want to enslave us.

He is our protective oligarch, fascist trying to shove this down our throats.

Corporate fascists come in all shape, sizes, colors and genders.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
3. Hold on a minute . . .
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 01:42 PM
Jan 2014

You think our President is an "Oligarch" and a "Fascist?" Really?

While I do not agree with President Obama on the TPP, I am certain he is not a fascist, not even close. As to his being an oligarch: if he is one, he is piss poor at it. He never operates like one.

drynberg

(1,648 posts)
5. I'm sad to say that our current President, B.H.Obama, is just a lackey for the Billionaires and
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 04:29 PM
Jan 2014

Corporados. He ain't one of them, but he ain't acting in our interest nor the interest of our nation.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
7. He is too accommodating to them and their interests, yes.
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 07:07 PM
Jan 2014

"Lackey" is further than I would go though. Remember, he is a Constitutional scholar, not an economist or expert on trade negotiations. I fault him for taking bad advice from deceptive and self-serving advisers, but I don't believe he is owned by the wealthy class, as is the case with any number of members of Congress.

Malteil

(58 posts)
8. When Obama was elected president, I was more hopeful for the future than I had ever been in my life.
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 03:13 PM
Jan 2014

I truly believed that the U.S. had made the greatest of all possible choices for POTUS. Though I had never been a fan of the ACA and thought that a single payers system would have been better, I thought that it would be a good step in the right direction. Then there were issues here and there that I had concerns about, like his always trying to offer the Republicans any and every deal. Next was the NDAA that he signed in 2011. Goodbye Habeas Corpus and Posse Comitatus, hello permanent detentions. On and on it has gone. Now we have TPP which largely hands over economic control to corporations, taking all legal rights away from “we the people”, when dealing with said corporations. I am sorry but that is Oligarchy. That is rule by the rich when we lose all power to redress. The state of things really bothers me and I am more concerned about the future now than I think I even was before Obama was elected. Was it all him? No. He has been, perhaps, the greatest enabler that the corporations and the Right could have ever wanted though. If Bush had tried to pass any number of these, the left would have been screaming bloody murder. It’s sad that but for a few exceptions; Warren, Sanders etc. that the difference between the Democrats and Republicans largely seems to be in name only.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
9. He is hardly, "The greatest enabler that the corporations and the Right could ever want."
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 05:39 PM
Jan 2014

Let me remind you of Mitt Romney, the guy who publicly stated that "Corporations are people," and as much as wrote off half of the American people (in order to serve the wealthiest among us). Can you even imagine Romney pushing for an extension of unemployment benefits or a raise in the minimum wage? As much as I dislike many of the decisions our President has made, let us never forget that the Republican candidates he defeated would have saddled us with far, far worse decisions.

I am not suggesting you stop complaining, not at all. But we should also thank our lucky stars we have President Obama, instead of what we might have gotten in his place.

Malteil

(58 posts)
10. Okay, yes Romney and McCain (Palin… Shudder) would have been worse.
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 07:19 PM
Jan 2014

Romney so, because he is part of that corporate world; McCain for many reasons, but none greater than Palin (shudder). But the problem I was illustrating was how under the radar so many of Obama’s bad decisions have flown. Deportations are up every year, until very recently the DOJ was cracking down really hard on pot in states where it has been deemed legal, the use of drones has steadily increased and Obama’s treatment through the DOJ on whistleblowers has been draconian. My point is that I voted for one Obama and got one I never expected. I was a defender for years of Obama and still am on issues like his birth certificate and his attempt to shut down Gitmo, as well as his following through on leaving Iraq and hopefully Afghanistan. I just wanted and voted for the Progressive Obama only to get the center right Obama. And yes, he has drifted further and further to the right just trying to keep up with the Republicans mad dash to the far right.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
11. There is, of course, much truth in what you say . . .
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 09:26 PM
Jan 2014

Yet I have to be pragmatic, could President Obama have been truly progressive? Would his own political party have followed him? Did he have to cut deals we can't imagine to just succeed in holding the reactionary forces to what small gains they did make?

Malteil

(58 posts)
14. I guess then,
Sat Jan 18, 2014, 01:03 PM
Jan 2014

being pragmatic, we need to ask ourselves what successes have been achieved under Obama and then decide if those successes outweigh the negative. Perhaps, in the vein of being pragmatic, we need to look at the future and decide if the Democratic party can ever be a force for good or only ever be a weak levy against a far right ideology. If as you say, the Democratic party would never have allowed Obama to be progressive, and I am assuming that you are saying that Obama’s progressive leanings were neutered by his own party, then we are in a time where a truly progressive populist third party is needed. A party that operates on the local and state level. One that can show even tea partiers that the population, as a whole, share the same needs and concerns that are never given a thought by the major parties. The Green party had a sound platform but their greatest flaw was that most of the people that would have been represented by that platform never saw themselves as “Green”.


But we digress...

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
18. Even one more Republican administration in the White House . . .
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 04:55 PM
Jan 2014

I love the Greens' proposals and platforms, I am a liberal and a progressive. But is there even a chance they will win the Presidency in 2016? What they could possibly do (as they did in 2000) is take enough votes away from the Democrats to give the Presidency to the GOP.

At the current time, our nation and people can not afford even one more Republican administration in the White House. It would be a disaster we might not come back from as a united country.

The Greens should concentrate on electing mayors, Congress people and governors. Once they have succeeded at that, I will take them seriously on the national scene. Until they do achieve some local and state-wide success, I will consider them really nothing but a GOP ploy to take away much-needed Democratic votes for the next President.

 

swilton

(5,069 posts)
16. The difference I see between President
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 10:33 PM
Jan 2014

Obama and a President Palin, Romney or McCain is that with those as alternatives the Democrats and more of the public would have strongly opposed their policies....With Obama in the WH he is doing the bidding of the corporatists and the opposition has been emasculated for fear of hurting election chances, or fear of criticizing the first African American president, etc., etc. We're in this lesser of two evils mode and our country might as well have been flushed down the toilet.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
17. Politics for me is more defense than offense.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 04:44 PM
Jan 2014

"Learn all you can about the candidates, and then vote for the one who is likely to hurt you the least."

In my case (and that of about 99% of the country) the one who will hurt the least is always the Democrat.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Leaked TPP Document Revea...