Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 02:35 AM Jan 2014

What Jack McCoy Would Have To Say To Wildstein's Attorney About Immunity In Exchange For Information

We all know Wildstein's lawyer is trying to tease the NJ Committee on the Fort Lee affair with offers of immunity. We all know what a REAL prosecutor who's interested in public justice would say to that.

"Immunity? If I've got a dozen witnesses who saw you kill somebody, your ass is going to jail. Why the hell should I offer you immunity in exchange for you telling me who told you to do it? On the other hand, I MIGHT offer you a SLIGHTLY lighter sentence if you start talking NOW."

And then say something like this...

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Jack McCoy Would Have To Say To Wildstein's Attorney About Immunity In Exchange For Information (Original Post) TrollBuster9090 Jan 2014 OP
I've been wanting to ask this myself, but didn't quite know how rocktivity Jan 2014 #1
I'm no legal expert but I wonder, too. My question is - what if they give him immunity calimary Jan 2014 #3
Generally, the prosecutors adieu Jan 2014 #4
Ha! ReRe Jan 2014 #2

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
1. I've been wanting to ask this myself, but didn't quite know how
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 02:52 AM
Jan 2014

Do we NEED to give Wildstein immunity -- and if so, how much?

We've got Christie nailed on obstruction -- his phone call to New York Gov. Cuomo to complain about the inquiry into what he must have known was a non-existent traffic study makes him a participant in a coverup. SHOULD Wildstein get off scot free in exchange for making it possible to charge Christie as a conspirator or the mastermind?


rocktivity

calimary

(81,220 posts)
3. I'm no legal expert but I wonder, too. My question is - what if they give him immunity
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 10:25 AM
Jan 2014

and then he gives up - NOTHING? You know how it's said that a good lawyer always knows the answer to the question before he/she asks the question? What if they give him immunity and he doesn't have much to contribute - for whatever reason (that would probably entail either fear of reprisal or covering for his "friend&quot ? Is there a way prosecutors have of knowing or getting a tip-off or a clue from the target that they're gonna give you useable information in exchange for a "Get Out of Jail Free" pass like this? I'd hate to see this guy given a pass and then have the prosecution wind up with nothing in exchange.

 

adieu

(1,009 posts)
4. Generally, the prosecutors
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 12:52 PM
Jan 2014

will weigh the information given before offering any sort of immunity or reduced sentence precisely because of this asymmetric knowledge level.

As to the eventual admission, I guess the DA doesn't want to be like the senate in Godfather Part II where Michael Corleone gets away with it by bringing in Brother Vincenzo from Sicily.

I think in this day and age, the prosecutors or whoever have a better game plan. My suspicion is that they will give Wildstein a reduced sentence. He's in too deep to get away scot free.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
2. Ha!
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 04:35 AM
Jan 2014

I say no immunity to anyone, and if they plead the fifth, throw them in jail for contempt of court. Let them sit in there until they talk. Period. No plea bargains.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»What Jack McCoy Would Hav...