Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Term Limits are Bad (Original Post) rdubwiley Jul 2014 OP
Good piece. Thanks for passing it on. pinto Jul 2014 #1
Term limits have been a tool of the extreme right starroute Jul 2014 #2
Very thoughtful piece markpkessinger Jul 2014 #3
The only reason we have Presidential Term limits is because the Republicans could never beat FDR Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #4

pinto

(106,886 posts)
1. Good piece. Thanks for passing it on.
Sun Jul 6, 2014, 12:17 PM
Jul 2014

The chalk board approach was a little odd - but the points made were right on, imo.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
2. Term limits have been a tool of the extreme right
Sun Jul 6, 2014, 12:25 PM
Jul 2014

This was written twenty years ago and described the situation in California at that time. In the long run, the extreme right may have shot itself in the foot. But the point remains that term limits were originally promoted as a means of enabling a small, disciplined block of voters to take over a state.


http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v08n1/chrisre3.html

Christian Reconstructionism
March/June 1994

The direct donations from these PACs and the personal contributions of Ahmanson and Hurtt, coupled with those of other PACs to which the group substantially contributed, amounted to nearly $3 million to 19 right-wing candidates for the California State Senate and various other conservative causes in 1992. A dozen candidates backed by the Christian Right won. Ahmanson himself is a member of the GOP state central committee, along with many other Christian Rightists, who have gained power by systematically taking over California GOP county committees.

A political operative named Wayne Johnson, who had been an architect of California's 1990 term limits initiative, managed the campaigns of several Ahmanson-backed candidates in 1992. The practical impact of term limits is to remove the advantage of incumbency (both Democratic and Republican) which the extreme Christian Right is prepared to exploit, having created a disciplined voting bloc and the resources to finance candidates.

At a Reconstructionist conference in 1983, Johnson outlined an early version of the strategy we see operating in California today. According to Johnson, the principal factor in determining victory in California state legislative races is incumbency, by a factor of 35 to 1. The legislature at the time was dominated by Democrats (and Republicans unacceptable to conservatives). The key for the Christian Right was to be able to: 1) remove or minimize the advantage of incumbency, and 2) create a disciplined voting bloc from which to run candidates in Republican primaries, where voter turn out was low and scarce resources could be put to maximum effect. Since the early 1990s, Christian Rightists have been able to do both. Thanks to Ahmanson, Hurtt, and others, they also now have the financing to be competitive. Since the mid-1970s, the extreme Christian Right, under the tutelage of then-State Senator H. L Richardson, targeted open seats and would finance only challengers, not incumbents. By 1983, they were able to increase the number of what Johnson called "reasonably decent guys" in the legislature from four to 27. At the Third Annual Northwest Conference for Reconstruction in 1983, Johnson stated that he believed they may achieve "political hegemony. . .in this generation." In 1994, they were not far from that goal. Rob Hurtt won a 1993 open seat by election for State Senate. In 1994, State Senator Hurtt was also the chairman of the Republican campaign committee for the State Legislature, an important power brokering role for a freshman State Senator. The GOP, led by conservative Christians, was only four seats away from majority control in 1994.

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
3. Very thoughtful piece
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:28 AM
Jul 2014

Of all of the proposals floating around out there for reform of Congress, term limits has been one I have been most ambivalent about. Look at what happened after the 2010 midterms, when an influx of of inexperienced tea party candidates were swept into office. All term limits accomplish is to make that process easier.

Thanks for passing this on.

Uncle Joe

(58,275 posts)
4. The only reason we have Presidential Term limits is because the Republicans could never beat FDR
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 12:51 AM
Jul 2014

They didn't want the Party of People to ever dominate the White House in such a manner again.


Thanks for the thread, rdubwiley.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Why Term Limits are Bad