Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Galraedia

(5,020 posts) Tue Oct 21, 2014, 11:05 AM Oct 2014

Rachel Maddow - Late 'churn' in voting rules sows confusion

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rachel Maddow - Late 'churn' in voting rules sows confusion (Original Post) Galraedia Oct 2014 OP

Don't touch my girlfriend? Are you kidding me? SmittynMo Oct 2014 #1

K&R!!! SCOTUS is totally partisan! To change and not have the voting law in effect just means Dustlawyer Oct 2014 #2

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)

1. Don't touch my girlfriend? Are you kidding me?

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Tue Oct 21, 2014, 01:19 PM

Oct 2014

What the hell was behind that statement? What an idiot.

Dustlawyer

(10,494 posts)

2. K&R!!! SCOTUS is totally partisan! To change and not have the voting law in effect just means

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Tue Oct 21, 2014, 02:04 PM

Oct 2014

they don't have to show ID, what is so confusing about that? No politician has the nerve to call SCOTUS out and start throwing out impeachment talk. The Republicans would be all over it if the situation was reversed.
Now why wouldn't Democrats try to do something about such an obvious, UN-American attack? Hmmm, I wonder.

Reply to this discussion