NY Times Already Ignoring Bernie Sanders

[circlethesquare]

The David Pakman Show

[Jackpine Radical]

1. Bernie who?

[BrotherIvan]

2. They sold the war too

So I wouldn't really call them an unbiased source. If they are willing to constantly compromise their credibility, they have no one to blame but themselves for being completely irrelevant.

[daleanime]

3. Gee, and they kept sending letters trying to get me to resubscribe....

if this is the level of coverage they can offer why would I want to.

[geretogo]

4. All they do is prove without a doubt what Bernie keeps saying that this country is an Oligarchy not

a democracy . That's all the more reason to vote for Bernie .

[emulatorloo]

5. Not worth much more that a Murdoch rag these days imho

[midnight]

11. I wondered if Murdoch was the owner...

[emulatorloo]

12. Not yet as far as I know.

[Thespian2]

6. Do real people

read the Times? I prefer AJ or The Guardian...

[LoisB]

7. I have been ignoring the N.Y. Times for years.

[Enthusiast]

8. The NYT is another of the pretend "liberal" sources.

[rhett o rick]

9. neo-liberal. nm

[Iwillnevergiveup]

10. What would be great

is if Bernie mentions this "oversight" himself in a big speech. The Sunday after he declared, there was not one word about Bernie in the Los Angeles Times either. Let's see about this weekend with his awesome fundraising on record. GO BERNIE!!!