Why a Bernie Sanders Presidency is so important:

[PeoViejo]

Watch it to the very end.

[Paka]

1. Thank you for the Posting. n/t

[PeoViejo]

2. You are very welcome.

[blm]

3. NEVER forget this evil being and his cronies maintain an iron grip on this nation's

Last edited Mon May 11, 2015, 11:56 AM - Edit history (1)

agenda via their 6 decades of developing and maintaining control of the the most hardened intel operatives here and around the world.

No president has had control over this group - this inner circle of fascist monsters - since JFK was sworn in.

[PeoViejo]

10. Agreed

FDR gave control of US Intelligence and Covert Operations (OSS) During WWII to the Boys. Once they had it, they realized its potential and never let go. Essentially, it accomplished what the attempted coup of 1933 failed to do, or, perhaps the coup didn't really fail, because its goals have been met over time.

[DhhD]

4. Warren said that she is not an insider. With Bernie Sanders coming next to the podium, she said

that the people would have to fight. She repeated the word, fight, several times; the People cheered louder each time. Sanders is independent. The People must: Get Up, Get Out, Go Vote.
I saw this video here on DU last week or so.

[PeoViejo]

12. Everyone should watch this Video

..even if it has to be posted multiple times to accomplish that goal.

[blm]

5. This Pakistani intel guy must still be cashing paychecks from BFEE.

Retired Paki intel = aligned with Poppy Bush.



The many problems with Seymour Hersh's Osama bin Laden conspiracy theory [View all]

http://www.vox.com/2015/5/11/8584473/seymour-hersh-osama-bin-laden


>>>
The evidence for all this is Hersh's conversations with two people: Asad Durrani, who ran Pakistan's military intelligence service from 1990 to 1992, and "a retired senior intelligence official who was knowledgeable about the initial intelligence about bin Laden’s presence in Abbottabad." Read that line again: knowledgeable about the initial intelligence. Not exactly a key player in this drama, and anonymous at that.

Hersh produces no supporting documents or proof, nor is the authority of either source established. We are given no reason to believe that either Durrani or the "knowledgeable official" would have even second- or thirdhand knowledge of what occurred, yet their word is treated as gospel. His other two sources are anonymous "consultants" who are vaguely described as insiders.
>>>

[forest444]

6. Some very good points there.

Not to mention the big picture, that being that bin Laden died in 2006.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/09/23/france.binladen/index.html

[blm]

7. Durrani's story is planted by BFEE - Durrani being an old intel ally.

I wouldn't trust a thing he says.

[PeoViejo]

11. Was this meant for another thread?

Seems so, but thanks for the kick, anyway.

[Rosa Luxemburg]

8. Bookmarked

[1monster]

9. kicking to watch later...