Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Galraedia

(5,020 posts) Sat May 30, 2015, 09:48 AM May 2015

Rachel Maddow - Hastert indictment raises questions of further charges

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rachel Maddow - Hastert indictment raises questions of further charges (Original Post) Galraedia May 2015 OP

I know that in Chicago there is a statute of limitation on mucifer May 2015 #1

Taking the Catholic priest pedophilia cases into account, Baitball Blogger May 2015 #3

It's very weird that the expert Rachel interviews didn't look up the information mucifer May 2015 #4

It raises the question why this didn't occur sooner. Baitball Blogger May 2015 #2

mucifer

(23,479 posts)

1. I know that in Chicago there is a statute of limitation on

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Sat May 30, 2015, 10:22 AM

May 2015

police torture. This was the insanity of the jon burge case. I would think there would be a statute of limitation on what hastard allegedly did many years ago.

The system sucks.

Baitball Blogger

(46,684 posts)

3. Taking the Catholic priest pedophilia cases into account,

Reply to mucifer (Reply #1)

Sat May 30, 2015, 11:50 AM

May 2015

I don't think there is any statute of limitation.

mucifer

(23,479 posts)

4. It's very weird that the expert Rachel interviews didn't look up the information

Reply to Baitball Blogger (Reply #3)

Sat May 30, 2015, 11:52 AM

May 2015

about statute of limitations before he went on tv.

Baitball Blogger

(46,684 posts)

2. It raises the question why this didn't occur sooner.

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Sat May 30, 2015, 11:48 AM

May 2015

I bet people knew about the abuse earlier and did nothing. I bet the tipping point was embezzlement of money. I bet if he had his own money, there still wouldn't have been an indictment.

Reply to this discussion