Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
1. What an ass Pat is
Tue May 15, 2012, 10:41 PM
May 2012

He makes ME sick to MY stomach.

So in other words, people who cannot have children should NOT marry blah! blah! blah! An abomination to god blah! blah! blah! What a surprise.

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
5. Basically that two guys having sex won't produce a baby...
Wed May 16, 2012, 12:37 AM
May 2012

...and it's all downhill from there.

Now you don't have to watch.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
14. Thanks, A/V. It means Christians should abstain until they want to have a baby, too.
Wed May 16, 2012, 10:15 AM
May 2012

This explains their anti-contraception position, got to be productive all the time, or celibate. I get it.

But by reducing human sexuality to mere livestock, the end result is a brute existance or slavery. The abundance of their numbers most likely to end in a huge barbeque, in a war not of their choosing.

For whose benefit shall men and women's bodies be reduced to one prescribed purpose in life?

That is the question that all should ask of those who are seeking to sell us something. Never stop learning more.

If these guys have so much energy for their one version of pleasing God, they should to apply it by reading the Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 5-7.

There is no mention of 'teh gay' there, but those verses define their actions next to those of Obama. That would end half their foolishness attacking others and him.

Marriage equality is not a religious question. Those who are asking to recieve the same benefits as others in society are not coming at this from religion, but equality granted under a secular state for what they put into it.

The same ones wrapping their Bibles in the American flag need to realize the Constitution and their book are not the same things and never will be. You can have a republic with only limited authority in people's personal lives or you can have an overwhelming and oppressive theocracy.

To have what the religious right is selling, Mussolini's brand of religious fascism, you will have to give up both the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The leaders of the movement know this, but their followers are childish and don't see what they really are, wolves in sheep's clothing.

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
3. Pat's doctor has the easiest job in the world.
Tue May 15, 2012, 11:22 PM
May 2012

That crazy fucker only had two parts - a mouth and an asshole. And they're interchangeable.

xfundy

(5,105 posts)
4. Wait--Patty is taking about wee-wees and whoo-hoos! That's WRONG!
Wed May 16, 2012, 12:21 AM
May 2012

How do I explain to my kids, who i have kept isolated based on whether they have whoo-hoos or wee-wees and further isolated the ones with both, who must be kept up in the attic? Because if they actually SEE each other, no matter the age? they'll all buy slide rules and calculators to measure and see what might fit into what, as a banana is the perfect fit for the hand and NOTHING else? Oh, lordy, it's getting so hard to raise Godly children, unspoiled by science and common sense and simple imagination, let alone slide rules!!

I thought I "invented" the 69 position when I was in elementary school. If only someone had brought Baby Jesus™ to my house to zap my brain so it would never think again!!

Regardless, my 7th grade computation actually worked, and quite well. Oh, Devil! How you made me do that!!!

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
10. Why does anyone want to know what Pat Robertson has to say.. after all these years?
Wed May 16, 2012, 05:23 AM
May 2012

He has been on a holy mission to divide this country and change it to become his own personal theocracy with himself as king.
Meh, Goman na hitoga Kirada..

ScottLand

(2,485 posts)
11. He is right about procreation. So why aren't we fighting off the unions of
Wed May 16, 2012, 05:54 AM
May 2012

elderly and childless couples? In fact, what then would any couples need each other for after they produce and raise their kids? Why not be man enough to just SAY you're homophobic instead of bogging it all down in BS?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Pat Robertson responds to...