Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumThom Hartmann: NPR Needs To Clean Up Their House
National Public Radio is supposed to be unbiased in how they report on controversial issues - but can that really be the case - when one of their biggest commentators moonlights at Fox so-called News?
For more information on the stories we've covered visit our websites at thomhartmann.com - freespeech.org - and RT.com. You can also watch tonight's show on Hulu - at Hulu.com/THE BIG PICTURE and over at The Big Picture YouTube page. And - be sure to check us out on Facebook and Twitter!
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)NPR stint is done. We will have to really fight to get our Democracy away from corporate control!
appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)deliberate omission of candidate Bernie Sanders officially running as a Dem., now in 2nd place and who's also helping the DNC with fundraising as I understand it.
libodem
(19,288 posts)I'm sure she'll get right on that.
appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)other candidates she should step down and go to work exclusively for the Clinton campaign. With widespread dissatisfaction over her performance in the position of DNC Chair, especially the miserable 2016 election debate schedule DWS' days may be numbered. We can only hope; she should have resigned after the 2014 elections or earlier.
bjobotts
(9,141 posts)Dem debates would get the democratic agenda before the public but DWS is keeping the dem message from getting out so all we hear about are republican stunts and messages. The entire voting population needs to hear the democratic message thru debates.
Response to libodem (Reply #3)
appalachiablue This message was self-deleted by its author.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...RT (Russian Times) is producing relevant news stories and commentary,
and our own NPR has become a propaganda organ.
(I still listen to Prairie Home Companion every Sat night,
but that wonderful show is not going to last much longer.
It won't be the same without Keillor)
LuvNewcastle
(16,844 posts)I used to listen all the time; now I mostly listen when they're playing classical music. They definitely have a RW slant when it comes to news. I'll start listening to the talk when they start talking about something worthy of my attention.
Uncle Joe
(58,354 posts)Thanks for the thread, thomhartmann.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)I can't forgive her for being dismissive to anti-war demonstrators and anti-Bush sentiment in general during the run up to the invasion of Iraq.
She's one of those "journalists" who seems to get all of her information from Republicans at cocktail parties in Georgetown. She must be best buddies with Cokie Roberts.
appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)in the distinctively cool and old guard Cokie way. Years ago a DC supervisor we had was a dead ringer for her, they could have been sisters or twins which was fairly unsettling at times.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)the female David Brooks. A pundit who is republican and yet has some sort of reasonable and "insightful" patina. She's insufferable.
appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)Orrex
(63,203 posts)Otherwise how will I know how terrible and incompetent and out-of-touch Democrats are?
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)You owe David Brooks an apology.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)smugly asserting(on "Morning Edition" that the results proved that the U.S.(through the Contra atrocities and the economic embargo) forced the Sandinistas to hold elections.
To her, the deaths of thousands of Nicaraguan civilians were a small price to pay for the U.S. regime getting to claim that it had got its way.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Be sure to go over to NPR's various websites and leave a comment.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Why don't we have a good liberal radio station over this whole country for good liberal reporters/hosts like Thom?
Seems like republican air waves are everywhere. I don't understand why liberal programs are so hard to sustain, since supposedly this country is more liberal than conservative.
I guess it's true...you don't know what you've lost till it's gone...and the more you are afraid of being marginalized, the stronger you fight to stay relative.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Amazing how memories can fade...and to explain goes into the "ether." Who can remember when the deluge of forgetfulness takes over as our internet Bandwidth Shrinks due to inaffordability and choice (yet allows top rate access to Netflix and Amazon for our Movie Entertainment) and Access is denied (with Time Outs and Reloads) for those of us out there who want to watch "Alternative Media" for News Reporting outside the MSM.
-----------
What you say:
Seems like republican air waves are everywhere. I don't understand why liberal programs are so hard to sustain, since supposedly this country is more liberal than conservative.
I guess it's true...you don't know what you've lost till it's gone...and the more you are afraid of being marginalized, the stronger you fight to stay relative.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)and the more you are afraid of being marginalized, the stronger you fight to stay relative.
Like our lives depended on it.
cprise
(8,445 posts)And liberal is hardly the opposite of conservative when the latter is preoccupied with extending militarism and xenophobia in every way possible. Selling fear is how you get liberals to go along with your agenda.
There are also the anecdotes (the trend?) of people like Thom Hartman and Cenk Uygur who were rejected as too anti-establishment despite performing well. If you are a heavy at a corporation like MSNBC, its near impossible to be comfortable with a journalist on your team pointing out that your financial backers (and the system they essentially own) are corrupt or lawless. Liberal and especially progressive journalists are shut out even if the audience likes them.
I should also mention Dan Rather (and his producer and two others) who were ousted because they criticized Bush. That was a very high-profile purge.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Or people who think like liberals, even if they don't claim to be one, why are the sponsors of these stations not supporting liberal programming for the majority of us? Isn't it what many of us want to watch or listen to?
Or does the audience no longer matter? Is it just a money game now, where sponsors pay for a program that the station owner wants to run, but there is no correlation to people (the audience) buying their product?
cprise
(8,445 posts)And the audience matters a lot less to them now than it used to. They hope they can keep walking all over us if they keep us over-entertained and uninformed.
Scruffy1
(3,255 posts)A few years ago one of my friends asked why I never listened to the radio, and later that night, on my way to work I turned on NPR. it hadn't improved a bit. Their favorite gimmick is putting on paid hacks as honest opinion, without ever mentioning who pays them. It's the old "who's your daddy?' that every reporter should know how to find out.
The reporters from NPR I've met deem to have no beliefs except that the public is stupid and they want to keep their jobs. Once the Public funding dwindled and they begin relying on corporate "donations" it was the end of them as any kind of worthwhile news source.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)I'll remember that.
840high
(17,196 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And who is going to want to fund a radio station that has already gone to the dogs.
We need to put our money where our mouth is.
wolfie001
(2,227 posts)As a Bush appointee, chairman Kenneth Y. Tomlinson was a disgusting RW hack who openly slanted news stories to the right. This was over a decade ago.
barbtries
(28,787 posts)pisses me off on a daily basis. i think they're trying to create a self-fulfilling prophecy of republican rule along with the rest of corporate media.