Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumJeb! advisor Gen Michael Hayden praises Hillary: the 'right formula going forward'
General Michael Hayden on Morning Joe 10.23.15
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Imdeed, Geneeral Hayden is one of the architects of the undermining of the Fourth Amendment. I have no use for him at all and an endorsement from him is a yellow flag.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)The kiss of death.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Silence from the Hillary supporters on this thread. Interesting.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)"dimes difference?"
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)she'll do exactly what 'they' tell her to do.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Additionally, no one in the military should be determining our foreign policy. That is rock solid.
Why should we be expected to embrace perpetual war when they want to cut my social security and medicare?
None of these fucking conflicts they created have made us more secure, on the contrary.
Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)raindaddy
(1,370 posts)than Obama!"
- Gen. Michael Hayden
Nothing else needs to be said......
MisterP
(23,730 posts)raindaddy
(1,370 posts)Or working in a hospital that gets bombed.. Wondering how many kids we could lift out of poverty with the money we spend on "lightweight" wars?
MisterP
(23,730 posts)because they're so confident that commando raids will win the war
it's like how the "counterinsurgency lobby" from Vietnam took over under Reagan and just ended up in an unwinnable Central American war that just produced 250,000 dead and a lot of crack in our cities
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)That's a good example...Reagan's basement war. I've read excerpts of Lawrence Walsh's book.. He was the prosecutor in Iran/Contra. He said the only thing that saved Reagan from prosecution was the fact he was so senile....
Now they don't even bother to investigate..
MisterP
(23,730 posts)swift war in 1991 (where we'd rescued a poor attacked Friendly from "the fourth largest army in the world" and the sinister anti-American dictator at its head)
Iran-Contra wasn't monolithic at all: we had Birchers like North, Singlaub, and Secord (wanted America to follow Argentina's lead and stop with this "competitive electoral democracy" nonsense), "liberal interventionists" like Kirkpatrick (pro-Britain, pro-Pinochet, thought the Dems had betrayed liberalism by letting the new totalitarians take over Africa and now Nicaragua), and the "COIN lobby" of experts in guerrilla tactics, terrorism, and psyops: what hadn't been allowed to succeed in South Vietnam (or had turned into the Phoenix Program butchery) would be used to make the Salvadoran Army out-guerrilla the guerrillas
didn't work
there's actually a danger in the appeal of all these lightweight in-and-out "interventions": bloodless except for end of an utterly-wicked target, more legitimate than the complaining dictatorship, and risky to neither the commandos nor the polls; of course OBL's death (evidently in Pakistani Army custody) just kicked off a new situation where AQ was out of ISI's protection now and vulnerable to use by Doha and Riyadh to overthrow some dictators with our blessing, and then takeover by some new Mesopotamian leaders ...
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)Thanks again for the background info....