Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Too Big to Fail" (2011) - Financial Crisis Explained (Original Post) iandhr Mar 2016 OP
Trade deals were behind the looting which means it was an inside job. Baobab Mar 2016 #1
I generally find that no one likes to include our trade deficit feeding this bubble. Festivito Mar 2016 #2

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
1. Trade deals were behind the looting which means it was an inside job.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 08:36 PM
Mar 2016

do they explain that they knew in advance they were going to get bailed out ?

Or that a 1995 WTO trade deal was claimed by the Clinton Administration to be the reason we "had to" repeal Glass Steagall Act

Lots on citizen.org about that, look for a paper about "how GATS blocks size limits on too big to fail banks"

And now the neoliberal Obama-Clinton axis wants us to do the whole deregulation thing again. In TiSA. Its totally insane.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
2. I generally find that no one likes to include our trade deficit feeding this bubble.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 11:34 PM
Mar 2016

Three forty minute segments of constant redundant repetition is too much time for me tonight.

The reason the banks had all this stuff to sell was because the Chinese were buying it in order for the Chinese to get rid of all the excess dollars they would receive for all their manufacturing.

After years of being in a trade surplus under Clinton, we almost immediately started a trade deficit under *W Bush. I think that trade deficit continues to this day.

The more we bought from China over and above what they bought from us, the more money China put into a safe place: the housing market. The more money that went into the housing market, the higher the value on the houses.

Add that the stock market took a dive as *W Bush was selected. Average Americans also saw the housing market as a safer investment.

This housing market rise continues until it broke. China said we had to get them out of this bubble market and give us treasury bonds instead. I don't know if it broke first with China demanding we make China's investment whole, or if China realized it was a bubble and when they pulled out of the housing market, the market suddenly crashed.

China then started to hold billions in our treasury that used to be held by Americans. The Federal Reserve also stopped reporting M3, which by other sources skyrocketed as the Fed took on an untold amount of the Chinese holdings. A part that would not show up in the debt.

Our visible debt up by over a trillion in one year, the last year of W* Bush. And, the next year, that continued as Obama, probably forced, had to infuse more cash into the system. (Obama has since reduced the deficit each year since he started.)

I would love to see some economists explain this.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»"Too Big to Fail" (2011) ...