Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 12:59 PM Jun 2016

Maddow does the math: A Clinton clinch may be close



Rachel Maddow gives viewers a heads up about how close Hillary Clinton is to clinching the Democratic nomination and how an accounting of super delegates combined with the outcomes from Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands could put her over the top sooner than many people realize.
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maddow does the math: A Clinton clinch may be close (Original Post) Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 OP
Jacob Rascon is such a cutie pie UMTerp01 Jun 2016 #1
So what part of July 25 SmittynMo Jun 2016 #2
They've been in a hurry all along. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #9
What part of the number of delegates needed to win do you not understand? Lil Missy Jun 2016 #20
The nominee is SmittynMo Jun 2016 #21
Okie Dokie!! Lil Missy Jun 2016 #23
She needs 65 delegate to get nomination MFM008 Jun 2016 #29
Keep on sniffing the glue SmittynMo Jun 2016 #33
Men in black suits with badges. nt grasswire Jun 2016 #27
I didn't see anything about Clinton...it was all Trump protestors for me...? n/t Lucinda Jun 2016 #3
The video on YouTube was wrongly titled. I've edited to Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #5
I just caught it on the group thread post! Thanks for correcting the videos! Lucinda Jun 2016 #7
This video seems to be more in line with the description in the OP: Make7 Jun 2016 #4
You're right. That video was wrongly titled. I've edited to Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #6
Once again Wibly Jun 2016 #8
Uh-huh, and that's precisely why, as of June 7th, Clinton will be referred to Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #10
That a fact? freedom fighter jh Jun 2016 #14
Did you even watch Maddow's crystal clear explanation? Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #16
See what I mean? freedom fighter jh Jun 2016 #18
That is God's honest truth OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #11
So has it ever been, since the supers were instituted back in the 80's-- Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #12
Oh boy, someone that is good with facts and how to find them. Do us all a favor and look up how A Simple Game Jun 2016 #25
Super delegates will NOT MFM008 Jun 2016 #30
Superdelegates don't vote until the convention. freedom fighter jh Jun 2016 #13
Completely unrecommended. Enthusiast Jun 2016 #15
I'll see you, and raise you a Kick and a Rec! Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #17
Maddow's a con girl Plucketeer Jun 2016 #19
She is a bundle of talent. Unfortunately.................... Enthusiast Jun 2016 #24
Apples and oranges, there was only one Republican candidate at the time A Simple Game Jun 2016 #26
About a month ago, she SmittynMo Jun 2016 #22
The only thing she's clinching Jester Messiah Jun 2016 #28
12 days to swallow those sour apples about HRC MFM008 Jun 2016 #31
Heh, probably not. Jester Messiah Jun 2016 #32

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
20. What part of the number of delegates needed to win do you not understand?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:10 PM
Jun 2016

Why are you dragging your feet when the nominee is crystal clear?

This is how it's done - the rules and requirements didn't change - not even for St. Bernie.

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
21. The nominee is
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jun 2016

NOT crystal clear. I never claimed anything changed. It's quite simple. Super delegates vote on July 25. Not before, not after. What part don't YOU understand here?

MFM008

(19,803 posts)
29. She needs 65 delegate to get nomination
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:28 PM
Jun 2016

the rest of the world is not going to sit around until Sanders gets the math.
The minute she hits the number the media is going to say PRESUMPTIVE nominee.
You can sit around until July 2016 or July 2017 the world will not cease to rotate.
The convention is formality.
If Mr. Sanders is NOT in it for himself and his glory he will lead the way to nominate HRC like she
did Barack Obama in 2008.
The way Mr. Sanders is burning his bridges he will be lucky anyone says good morning when he gets back to the senate.

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
33. Keep on sniffing the glue
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:32 AM
Jun 2016

It's making you delusional.

65 is an inaccurate number and is way off.

Just keep this in your mind. July 25. Nothing else matters. Be prepared.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
7. I just caught it on the group thread post! Thanks for correcting the videos!
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 01:27 PM
Jun 2016

It will be interesting to see if it happens in NJ or sooner!

Wibly

(613 posts)
8. Once again
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 01:51 PM
Jun 2016

The super delegates are not counted until the convention. They can change anytime up until then, but will not be counted until then.
This "math" is nothing but conjecture and fantasy, and a desperate attempt by the Clinton campaign and their media backers to short circuit due process.
Shameful.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
10. Uh-huh, and that's precisely why, as of June 7th, Clinton will be referred to
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 02:01 PM
Jun 2016

as the "presumptive" nominee, and NOT the "official" nominee.

Not rocket science--just semantics.

Expect a tsunami of super commitments after the CA polls close on Tuesday.

freedom fighter jh

(1,782 posts)
14. That a fact?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 02:14 PM
Jun 2016

The primaries are not over yet. California, the big enchilada still has to vote. Even counting superdelegates, it does not make sense to say now that Clinton will be the presumptive nominee then -- unless you are presuming to know how the vote in the June 7 primaries will go.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
16. Did you even watch Maddow's crystal clear explanation?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 02:21 PM
Jun 2016

Clinton will have the 65 delegates she needs to reach the requisite 2,383 with NJ alone--that's without counting CA at all.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
12. So has it ever been, since the supers were instituted back in the 80's--
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 02:07 PM
Jun 2016

2008 being the most recent case in point. The vast majority of the supers commit BEFORE the convention.

No conspiracy, no rigging.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
25. Oh boy, someone that is good with facts and how to find them. Do us all a favor and look up how
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:35 PM
Jun 2016

many 2008 "pledged" super delegates switched from Hillary to candidate Obama BEFORE the convention.

freedom fighter jh

(1,782 posts)
13. Superdelegates don't vote until the convention.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 02:10 PM
Jun 2016

Until then they can change their minds. Their votes have not happened yet. Without superdelegates' votes, Hillary is not so close to having the nomination clinched.

Is there any real chance that many superdelegates will change their minds? I certainly hope they will keep their minds open as more information about the candidates becomes available.

See http://thompsontimeline.com/ .

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
15. Completely unrecommended.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 02:21 PM
Jun 2016

Maddow has been nothing but lies and misinformation since this election started.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
19. Maddow's a con girl
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 02:47 PM
Jun 2016

With Rachel - you need to listen really close. REALLY CLOSE. She's honed the art of what she doesn't say to a level of mastery matched by very, very few.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
26. Apples and oranges, there was only one Republican candidate at the time
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:38 PM
Jun 2016

Trump gained enough delegates, there was no one to switch to. There are still two Democratic candidates and neither will likely have enough pledged delegates in the first round of voting at the convention.

Really no comparison at all.

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
22. About a month ago, she
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 03:23 PM
Jun 2016

went all in on HRC. Someone got to her. Prior to that, at least she liked Bernie. Ever since that date, NOT so much. I no longer listen to her bullshit. MSNBC has done a complete 180 degree turnaround. I'm very disappointed.

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
32. Heh, probably not.
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 12:01 AM
Jun 2016

The fight will continue, by other means if necessary. But you go ahead and believe what you need to believe.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Maddow does the math: A C...