Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumliberal N proud
(60,298 posts)The delegates that should be eliminated?
Now they are important?
Hypocrisy!
Skink
(10,122 posts)liberal N proud
(60,298 posts)Who is the designer?
A-B Edit
Osceola Macarthy Adams
Adolfo
Adrian
Joseph Abboud
Ray Aghayan
Lanie Alabanza-Barcena
Steven Alan
Larry Aldrich
Jason Alkire
Cindy Ambuehl
Spencer Antle
Pegah Anvarian
Kevin Aviance
Anya Ayoung-Chee
Mark Badgley
Xenobia Bailey
John Bakel
Jeffrey Banks
Travis Banton
Jhane Barnes
Dennis Basso
Michael Bastian
Suede Baum
Geoffrey Beene
Bill Belew
Hunter Bell
Henri Willis Bendel
Stacey Bendet
Laura Bennett
Susan Bennis
Fonzworth Bentley
Chris Benz
Robyn Berkley
James Pasqual Bettio
Jonas Bevacqua
Bibhu Mohapatra
Jeanne Bice
Richard Blackwell
Bill Blass
Mildred Blount
Main Bocher
Stevie Boi
Krayzie Bone
Waraire Boswell
Tony Bowls
Rosemary Brantley
Tom Brigance
Helen Brockman
Bonnie Broel
Gessica Brooke
Donald Brooks
Thom Browne
Sabrina Bryan
Morris Bublick
Dana Buchman
Tory Burch
Stephen Burrows
Jon Buscemi
Lauren Bush
Ebenezer Butterick
Amanda Bynes
C-E Edit
Jean Cacicedo
Lilian Cahn
Joan Calabrese
Eva Camacho-Sánchez
Carlos Campos
Vince Camuto
Ruth Sacks Caplin
Albert Capraro
Alex Carleton
Elizabeth Carpenter
Kelly Carrington
Bonnie Cashin
Kristin Cavallari
Sal Cesarani
Richard Chai
Angel Chang
Alabama Chanin
Ceil Chapman
Reco Chapple
Monika Chiang
Margaret Cho
Andrew Christian
Matthew Christopher
Claw Money
James Clifford
Kenneth Cole
Sean Combs
Dennis Comeau
Cristi Conaway
Lauren Conrad
Mandy Coon
Michael Costello
Jeffrey Costello
Caresse Crosby
Laura Dahl
Eric Daman
Debra Davenport
Ellen Louise Demorest
Jane Derby
Lyn Devon
Hilary Duff...
midnight
(26,624 posts)Interesting point about creating them.
liberal N proud
(60,298 posts)I would not publish names of Super Delegates
midnight
(26,624 posts)liberal N proud
(60,298 posts)Hypocrites don't hire the designer of SD's
George II
(67,782 posts)Interesting, eh?
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)And they claim he's an independent and shouldnt even run as a Democrat even though he offered to caucus with them when their butts were on the line. FOOLS....if he HAD run as an independent there would be no possibility of a President Clinton.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Good GAWD I wih people would cut this crap out. No delegates vote till July. Why the everloving HELL tey would switch to Bernie after he called the entire PARTY Corrupt has never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever been explained. Ever. They DO NOT LIKE HIM!!! Can yall get that through your heads? Cant jut force people who cannot stand you to switch to support you just caus you say you can beat Trump. Nobody CARES what he says about the polls with him vs Trump. Let me go post ths in gdpee.
midnight
(26,624 posts)are you saying this because delegates july 25 vote info. is not true? Or are you just saying it bothers you because it is true?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Gore1FL
(21,027 posts)humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)She is nothing but presumptive because she did not end this primary with pledge delegates. If the FBI recommends and justice indicts her before the convention of course the supers will not vote for her and Bernie will be the nominee with the super delegates votes putting him over the top....
The absolute worse thing that could happen is that after the convention she gets indicted... do you even understand how bad that will be for the Democratic party and frankly for America?
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)SouthernDemLinda
(182 posts)Relevant Excerpts:
Hillary Clinton Emails
June 7, 2016
The Huffington Post
Why Hillary Clinton Could Face Indictments and How This Makes Bernie Sanders Nominee
H. A. Goodman | Posted 06.06.2016 | Politics
However, Bernie Sanders has won 21 states and earned almost 10 million votes, without the help of Democratic officials beholden to his political power. Furthermore, Vermonts Senator will be the only person left standing politically, if the FBI recommends indictments of Hillary Clinton to the Department of Justice. For people who believe Clinton is too powerful to jail, heres a quick breakdown of why indictments could be imminent, and why Bernie Sanders is poised to become Democratic nominee.
Its a crime under the Espionage Act to willingly, or inadvertently, transfer 22 Top Secret emails from secure
State Department servers, to an unguarded private server. This is essentially what Hillary Clinton paid Bryan Pagliano to do (when linking her private computer server to secure State servers) and is likely the reason he was granted immunity.
It is a crime to remove government documentsclassified and Top Secretfrom secure locations and store them within unsecure locations. I ask how Clinton got this Top Secret intelligence onto a private server in the following YouTube segment.
Whether or not the existence of Clintons server was known by others is entirely irrelevant to her own legal predicament.
President Obama could be bending the truth about learning of the server in 2015, however even if he knew beforehand, its Clintons actions that will be the center of controversy. She needed the server for a reason, and it wasnt convenience.
Most importantly, Clintons Top Secret emails contained Special Access Program intelligence; an aspect overlooked by pundits focused solely upon emails and intent. The severity of Clintons SAP emails is highlighted in a Wall Street Journal article titled Hillarys Special Access Server:
The SAPspecial access programreference in particular is ringing Washington alarms. A SAP usually refers to a highly covert technology program, often weaponry. Knowledge of these programs is usually restricted to small groups of people on a need-to-know basis.
NBC News first reported that the SAP reference on Mrs. Clintons server is so sensitive that Mr. McCullough had to get special clearance before he could even view the intelligence-community declarations.
Mrs. Clinton would surely have recognized the sensitive nature of such a programthe details of which were sitting on her unsecured email server, affording special access to any quality Chinese hacker.
This is probably why Mrs. Clintons campaign decided to smear Mr. McCullough as a partisan.
The existence of Special Access Program intelligence is often denied by the U.S. government and is considered the highest classification; even beyond Top Secret.
Regarding her SAP emails, Clintons server was unencrypted for three months. Because this server was unguarded, I explain here why Clinton harmed U.S. national security.
Under the Espionage Act, gross negligence is enough to prosecute, so intent isnt needed when evaluating the harm done to national security from an unencrypted private server containing Top Secret emails. Simply claiming ignorance, or disinterest, or naiveté in using a private server isnt enough to circumvent criminal indictments under the Espionage Act.
The fact that Hillary Clinton owned an unencrypted private server at her home, combined with the fact foreign nations (and Romanian hacker Guccifer) attempted to hack into her server, are other reasons indictments should be a genuine concern for all Hillary supporters.
As for the retroactively classified emails, retroactively classified intelligence was enough to convict CIA whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling and indict NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake.
If Clinton isnt indicted, free Jeffrey Sterling.
I explain that retroactively classified intelligence has already been upheld by the courts in the following YouTube segment. Regarding the intelligence found on Clintons server, the SAP information was born classified. Thus, none of the born classified emails needed markings, or any clarification on the documents; Clinton should have known this intelligence needed to be stored within State Department servers.
Then of course, the recent State Department ruling that Clinton violated rules is another reason for potential indictments. As stated by CNN, Hillary Clinton was never given authority to own a private server, and her email practices broke internal guidelines:
Therefore, the basis for imminent indictments rests upon the fact that neither the State Department, nor the president gave Clinton the authority to use a private server. Since this server contained SAP and other Top Secret intelligence, and since these emails are born classified and immune to any retroactively classified defense of owning the server, Clinton faces legal consequences.
Finally, a USA Today piece by Phillip Jennings titled Secretary without honor: Voices highlights the enormity of Clintons email fiasco:
I explain in my latest MSNBC appearance why Clintons emails will lead to indictment. Regardless of delegate count, Bernie Sanders is the true front-runner and the DNC will need Vermonts Senator very soon. Clinton barely defeats Trump in the polls and only one Democratic nominee faces the prospect of Espionage Act indictments.
Follow H. A. Goodman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/HAGOODMANAUTHOR
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)AntiBank
(1,339 posts)ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)He would be one of the more moderate members of the Social Democrat party (our dominant party for 80 years, with interruptions) here in Sweden. The USA is so far to the right it is ludicrous how right-wing a "left liberal" USA politician can be.. Clinton would be centre to pretty hard right in most euro countries, especially her foreign policy, her bankster ass-kissing, and her shitty trade policies. She is so not centre left on most things, other than some ("evolved", lol) social issues.
dubyadiprecession
(5,613 posts)Few of them will want to stay on the losing side. You can count on it.
Omaha Steve
(99,054 posts)They want to be re-elected!
appalachiablue
(41,047 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)kadaholo
(304 posts)the biggest night yet for Bernie donations!
pnwmom
(108,925 posts)And it won't happen this time, either. The supers aren't going to turn their backs on the diverse voters across the country who put Hillary ahead by millions of votes.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)depending on the outcome of this FBI investigation will determine exactly what the supers will do, it is a real shame she couldn't win this thing with outright pledge delegates then it wouldn't matter she would be the nominee.. but this mission accomplished crap is baffling to me.
pnwmom
(108,925 posts)And of course she needs some super-delegates to reach the majority of total delegates, because the total number includes some 700 super delegates.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)only 263 delegates separate her and Bernie... You cannot count the supers that was my point.... her BS number of 2383 is only because all the party insiders have said they will vote for her but actually won't until the convention and anything can happen between now and then.... she may suspend her campaign for one reason or another and the supers will give Bernie over 2383, so stop all the mission accomplished BS
pnwmom
(108,925 posts)the only ones Bernie thinks should count.
Or at least that's what he used to say.
Gman
(24,780 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,477 posts)midnight
(26,624 posts)super delegate count happeing in July. Thought it was an interesting presentation.
Gman
(24,780 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Norman Conch Quest
(64 posts)And I'm absolutely certain that my gift will be a naked Alyssa Milano!
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)They're not going to switch.
Whatever hallucinogenic drugs some of you people are taking, you really need to stop.
SouthernDemLinda
(182 posts)He's not the one always LOL.....ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
George II
(67,782 posts)rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)OK, happy?
If for some reason a couple hundred committed superdelegates change their minds we'll get back to you.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)What is the big deal? Why is everyone all uptight about Bernie going to the Convention and the nominee being decided there?
wisteria
(19,581 posts)still thinking he can win this, when he can't. The math has not been on his side for a while.
wisteria
(19,581 posts)the will of the majority of Democrat voters. It has always been done this way, and shouldn't be changed simply to suit Sander's idea that we should all wait for the enevitable.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)So really, the results on election night are more like a suggestion.