Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumChasstev365
(5,191 posts)I liked your post, but the way!
Response to Chasstev365 (Reply #1)
Post removed
RazBerryBeret
(3,075 posts)and I will gladly follow! thanks for posting!
LongTomH
(8,636 posts).....and Medicaid!!!!!
Real Democrats need to get behind Bernie, not attack him!!!!
George II
(67,782 posts)...that Democrats have not already done?
elleng
(130,865 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,013 posts)due to no fault of Bernie. What good comes of misplaced bitterness?
Gothmog
(145,131 posts)Sanders had no chance of being the nominee after Super Tuesday but continued his campaign which hurt Clinton. Here is a good example Sanders really hurt Clinton I am still mad at the number of times that trump used Sanders' claims against Clinton. Sanders' baseless charges that the system was fixed and rigged were used by trump to great effect and hurt Clinton http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/rigged-system-donald-trump_us_5855cb44e4b08debb7898607?section=us_politics
I think he was able to thread a certain toxic needle. But he did win, and were all going to pay the price.
John Weaver, aide to Ohio Gov. John Kasichs presidential campaign
The underlying irony for those who sought to end what they perceived as corruption is that they may well have elected a president whose record through the years and whose actions since the election signal it could be the most openly corrupt administration in generations.....
And if Sanders rhetoric during the primaries started that stew simmering with his talk about the system only working for the rich, Trump brought it to a full boil with his remarks blaming undocumented immigrants and trade agreements that he claimed were forged as the result of open corruption.
Sanders' bogus rigged process claim hurt a great deal
George II
(67,782 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)He's in the news almost daily fighting for "our values".
Isn't this petty whining about Bernie a bit like the Bernie Bros you hate so much? You can't get beyond the election and unite. Instead you must keep building on your hate. It's not productive and it's not helping.
It's time to come together as a team of Democrats and Independents to fight the real foe. The party that could destroy our country.
George II
(67,782 posts)He's being artificially put in the news by some who can't accept that he wasn't the nominee.
Hate? HATE? Just look at the subject line of the OP. Is that "productive"? You should be admonishing that one instead of one who is just reacting to the negative implication of the OP.
sheshe2
(83,746 posts)What exactly are you implying?
Chevy
(1,063 posts)Sure when he becomes a Democrat and stops attacking the party. Until then he's just an old man screaming to get off his lawn.
George II
(67,782 posts)elleng
(130,865 posts)Sanders will lead Democratic drive to organize rallies in every state against Medicare/Medicaid cuts.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028412650
George II
(67,782 posts)....houses) will be leading the Democratic drive.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)sheshe2
(83,746 posts)TIA
lapucelle
(18,252 posts)It would be more than a little awkward for him to expect the same funding that he received from the DSCC in 2012, especially if other candidates like Dean and Giordano are running on the Democratic line.
sheshe2
(83,746 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)qz.com/873725/senator-bernie-sanders-is-leading-the-democrats-into-battle-against-donald-trump-on-january-15/
You can google if this link doesn't work.
sheshe2
(83,746 posts)to sponsor these demonstrations. That was the question I responded to.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)https://www.google.com/amp/s/dailydot.relaymedia.com/amp/layer8/bernie-sanders-january-15-rallies-donald-trump/
George II
(67,782 posts)elleng
(130,865 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)elleng
(130,865 posts)He was unable to convince much of his faction to do the right thing on November 8. That would have been true and selfless leadership, and 65,000,000+ would have been grateful now and for a long time after. He missed his moment of greatness.
George II
(67,782 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)than HRC supporters voted for Obama.
In the next Congress, Bernie will be there, fighting for Democratic values,
and HRC will be at home.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)he cost HRC the election with his lies. . .
He's pro gun, anti-woman. . .
And he needs to get the fuck out of "my" party and create his own Democratic Socialist Party
Or, better yet, fade into obvilion.
See, that's the kind of Bernie hate I've seen posted over and over again here on DU.
George II
(67,782 posts)brer cat
(24,560 posts)rather than stating your own opinion of Bernie, your reply is entirely and astoundingly dishonest. George asked one simple question:
If you are giving your opinion of Bernie, I must say I'm a bit surprised, although people often have a change of heart. If you are trying to claim George made those statements, I can only look at the blank space under George's reply title and conclude that you made them up out of whole cloth.
See, that's the kind of Hillary-supporter hate I've seen posted over and over again here on DU.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)CousinIT
(9,240 posts)...as much animosity as he inexplicably attracts here, he certainly does.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)That Dems aren't perfect and have a lot of work to do- and that the status quo leaves a lot of people's needs unmet. He also has always made the point that they're far better than Republicans on basically everything. And always stood firm in supporting Hillary over Trump. Seems perfectly rational to me.
CousinIT
(9,240 posts)Don't exactly understand all the anger about Bernie.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)I'll probably attend if there's one nearby.
elmac
(4,642 posts)then some members of DU, at least I hope.
elleng
(130,865 posts)GOOD they'll work well together. A true SHAME that DUers don't.
montana_hazeleyes
(3,424 posts)Who are Bernie supporters saying are not "real leaders". I've seen many Bernie supporters treat President Obama horribly for instance. Many ,many times.
And I'm not against Bernie at all. You could not find one post where I put Bernie down.
I think everyone should fight together.
elleng
(130,865 posts)not from the OP poster.
Yes, especially now everyone should fight together.
montana_hazeleyes
(3,424 posts)We are in times like I've never seen and I'm over 65 years old!
elleng
(130,865 posts)and Ditto.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)ready, aim, FIRE!
elleng
(130,865 posts)Gotta watch a Mystery!
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)dhol82
(9,352 posts)Does that make any difference to the Sandernistas here?
TonyPDX
(962 posts)dhol82
(9,352 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)"Sandernistas"?
elleng
(130,865 posts)but 'others' really like to grab onto labels, it appears.
Gothmog
(145,131 posts)Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)Maine does.
Time to tell Bernie to go fuck himself and go away! Come on, everyone, it's fun to put Party over Principle!
zentrum
(9,865 posts)nini
(16,672 posts)Because it certainly appears someone who is NOT a Democrat rules the roost.
He would win over so many people if he'd actually join the party he wants to control. While his followers don't see that as a problem it is for many. So when you tell us we need to reach out to you and not see why it's important for him to be a member of the party he wants to control - we're not the problem.
I love his ideas.. I just don't like him and his own brand of narcissism.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)Oh and by the way, I volunteered, contributed, and voted for HRC, so NO all HRC voters are not Hill-bots.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)I think President Obama has been demonstrating for 8 years what a real leader is -- and so does a large majority of Americans.
George II
(67,782 posts)jalan48
(13,860 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... he refuses to be a member of?
Gothmog
(145,131 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... of people who refuse to be part of a group, but at the same time think they should "lead" that group.
jalan48
(13,860 posts)We need to return to our roots-we lost our way and the results of the last election point this out.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)What is that even supposed to mean?
jalan48
(13,860 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)jalan48
(13,860 posts)What? That big turnout didn't happen? I wonder why? Maybe we need to change our approach and message, or are you suggesting we just go full speed ahead with the same thing? Personally, I wan to see the Democrats win, how about you?
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... you can't explain what it means. That's what I figured.
Gothmog
(145,131 posts)Sanders admitted that he was running for media coverage and money http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/03/bernie-sanders-independent-media-coverage-220747
During a town hall-style event in Columbus, Ohio, the independent Vermont senator said, In terms of media coverage, you have to run within the Democratic Party. He then took a dig at MNSBC, telling Todd, the network would not have me on his program if he ran as an independent.
Money also played a role in his decision to run as a Democrat, Sanders added.
To run as an independent, you need you could be a billionaire," he said. "If you're a billionaire, you can do that. I'm not a billionaire. So the structure of American politics today is such that I thought the right ethic was to run within the Democratic Party.
This does not inspire a great deal of trust
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)He said he'd be a hypocrite if he ever ran as a Democrat, until he decided that he needed to use their resources to further his own ambitions - and then immediately dropped the pretense when they were no longer of any use to him.
lastone
(588 posts)That statement is just plain wrong and stupid, anyone who believes that Bernie Sanders ran for his own gain is an idiot and not paying attention in the least...
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Name: SANDERS, BERNARD (I - INCUMBENT)
Office Sought: S - SENATE
Election Year: 2018
State: VT - VERMONT, District: 00
Party: INDEPENDENT
If he's such a great "Democrat", why does he refuse to admit he's a "Democrat"????
jalan48
(13,860 posts)If Democrats expect to win they will need to be more like him.
George II
(67,782 posts)jalan48
(13,860 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)BainsBane
(53,031 posts)For ignoring campaign finance reform as a policy. That one popular politician can raise and spend unprecedented amounts of money in a presidential primary does nothing to address the way money--not just " corporate" money but wealth in general--thwarts democracy at all levels, the presidency being the least of it. But thanks to Bernie's successfully distracting from policy in favor of rhetoric about personal attributes, self-proclaimed progressives no loner talk about campaign finance reform at all. They just talk about how Bernie was able to raise enormous amounts of money. That some then voted against policies designed to address the problem by refusing to vote for Clinton confirms how little they care about policy to address the problem system wide. Even Bernie now talks not about changing the law but that all campaigns should raise money like he did, which is of course impossible for lower offices were candidates don't appear on television several times a week.
The net result of the primary and the general election was a massive blow to campaign finance reform.
jalan48
(13,860 posts)Citizens get that something is seriously wrong. Trump was the worst and most disliked Presidential candidate to ever run-and we lost to him!
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)Legislation and Scotus appointments are what change things. Making it about personal virtue over policy undermines reform, as the results of the election demonstrate all too well.
I don't share the fixation with rhetoric above policy. I'm not an ad exec or a political operative but instead a voter. I can only speak to what concerns me, and that is policy rather than sloganeering.
jalan48
(13,860 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)That my friend is true talent.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)The results demonstrate as much.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)The Democratic Party doesn't have many years left. If the future is to be attributed to one man, it should be someone young enough to continue in public service for more than a few years.
Frankly, the fixation on a single individual above any principle or idea doesn't give me confidence for the future of the party or the nation.
All of these threads eulogizing Bernie put him first. They are all about his career, what is entirely absent is any discussion of policy. The most we see is discussion of "messaging," its relation to policy entirely inconsequential. That so many focused on sloganeering and personality leaves me disheartened for our future as a nation. Americans no longer want public servants; they want kings, wheteher Trump or Bernie. Democracy cannot be sustained in such an environment.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)Bernie supporters adapted to supporting HRC. Now, it is time for the HRC supporters to adapt to Bernie being in the outreach leadership role.
Dear ones, we have work to do! We are fighting for the future of the America we envision.
HRC's slogan was "Stronger Together". That means all of us.
I will be at this Jan. 15th rally in my city, and will help with it as well.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)In EVERY state.
Response to portlander23 (Original post)
Post removed
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)The "leader" of a party he refused to be a part of - until he admitted he couldn't further his own political ambitions without the media attention being a Democrat-of-Convenience would bring?
The "leader" of the people who he sold himself to as an "outsider" - when he's never had a steady paycheque that didn't have Uncle Sam's name on the payor line?
The "leader" who told his supporters that the Democratic Party (the party he was allegedly running for) was corrupt - and the only person who could "fix it" was his own esteemed self?
The "leader" who doesn't want to BE a Democrat, but thinks all Democrats should defer to his superior knowledge about how they should conduct themselves?
The "leader" who didn't have enough class to concede the nomination looooong after it was obvious that he couldn't win?
The "leader" who told his followers to keep sending money to his campaign because he could "still win this" after he knew he'd lost?
The "leader" who told his supporters that he was "taking it to the Convention" - when he didn't, and knew he never would?
The "leader" who held himself out as "Mister Transparency", but who never DID cough-up those complete tax returns - and then blamed their absence on his wife's incompetence?
The "leader" who some are now claiming could have beat Trump - when he couldn't even get enough votes from the party he was supposedly running for to win their nomination?
THAT "leader"? No thanks. He doesn't sound like much of a "leader" to me.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)Gothmog
(145,131 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)Every word is true.
Response to portlander23 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed