Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

yuiyoshida

(41,818 posts) Sat Feb 25, 2017, 09:11 PM Feb 2017

Laverne Cox: Transgender Individuals 'Are Not Safe In This Country' Hardball MSNBC

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Laverne Cox: Transgender Individuals 'Are Not Safe In This Country' Hardball MSNBC (Original Post) yuiyoshida Feb 2017 OP

Sadly, Miss Cox is right. sarcasmo Feb 2017 #1

I was so sad to hear her series "doubt" got cancelled after two episodes. yeoman6987 Feb 2017 #2

It was good and had hoped for more episodes. :( sarcasmo Feb 2017 #3

You can't tell me... kag Feb 2017 #4

they always begin with the weakest groups :( luvMIdog Feb 2017 #5

sarcasmo

(23,968 posts)

1. Sadly, Miss Cox is right.

Reply to yuiyoshida (Original post)

Sat Feb 25, 2017, 09:13 PM

Feb 2017

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)

2. I was so sad to hear her series "doubt" got cancelled after two episodes.

Reply to sarcasmo (Reply #1)

Sat Feb 25, 2017, 09:23 PM

Feb 2017

I really liked it.

sarcasmo

(23,968 posts)

3. It was good and had hoped for more episodes. :(

Reply to yeoman6987 (Reply #2)

Sat Feb 25, 2017, 09:53 PM

Feb 2017

kag

(4,078 posts)

4. You can't tell me...

Reply to yuiyoshida (Original post)

Sun Feb 26, 2017, 09:55 AM

Feb 2017

that any guy who saw her in a men's room would argue that "belonged" there. Nor that any woman who saw her in a women's bathroom would be afraid that she was going to molest some little girl.

She is gorgeous!

luvMIdog

(2,533 posts)

5. they always begin with the weakest groups :(

Reply to yuiyoshida (Original post)

Sun Feb 26, 2017, 12:16 PM

Feb 2017

This is so sad.

Reply to this discussion