Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shields and Brooks on Spicer stepping down, GOP health care bill fumble (Original Post) Quixote1818 Jul 2017 OP
Good piece dalton99a Jul 2017 #1
I'm sick of stupid mikeyDE Jul 2017 #2
I guess he meant that 48 had pledged to vote for it. Which is as good as a vote... Honeycombe8 Jul 2017 #4
I get your point but mikeyDE Jul 2017 #5
That's true. That went right by me. I assumed they had pledged. Honeycombe8 Jul 2017 #6
I like these guys. They've been reporting on politics for a long time. Honeycombe8 Jul 2017 #3
 

mikeyDE

(31 posts)
2. I'm sick of stupid
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 05:06 PM
Jul 2017

Brooks said that 48 Republicans voted for the health care bill, "pretty impressive".

Fact: the bill didn't receive even one vote. When four senators pledged to vote No, McConnell pulled the bill rather than suffer defeat.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
4. I guess he meant that 48 had pledged to vote for it. Which is as good as a vote...
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 05:29 PM
Jul 2017

in the Senate. The Senators' reputations are hooked on how they say they will vote.

So McConnell just saved time by not going thru the vote, since 48 wasn't enough to pass it. Although it may have been a definite 46...I think several were definite NAY votes, and a couple were "probably not."

 

mikeyDE

(31 posts)
5. I get your point but
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 07:47 PM
Jul 2017

fact is last week 48 Senators did not pledge to vote yes (some did perhaps) but all 48 can truthfully say to constituents "I didn't kill the bill" and "I didn't vote for it." I suspect if it had come to a vote, there wouldn't have been 48 in favor. The two late No pledges were calculated to save several Senators at risk of losing seats or being primaried from having to pledge.

Of course, if McConnell succeeds in giving out favors to the at-risk, that all could change. Maybe as soon as Tuesday.

I guess what irked me about Brooks's statement was the "pretty impressive." There's nothing impressive about that lot.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
6. That's true. That went right by me. I assumed they had pledged.
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 11:47 PM
Jul 2017

Did you see the movie The American President with Michael Douglas? In it there are scenes where the W.H. people have a war room going, and they are constantly working the phones calling the Congressmen and getting a yay or nay on a bill. Their word is as good as gold. They don't go back on their pledged votes, or their name is mud. They know the W.H. is tallying the votes to know what to do and have to get the right score.

That doesn't mean, though, that they actually got a yes for the ones that didn't say no, I guess. I thought they had.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
3. I like these guys. They've been reporting on politics for a long time.
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 05:27 PM
Jul 2017

They have good insights into political goings on and people. Thanks.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Shields and Brooks on Spi...