Fighting against insurgencies is to protect the freedoms of future generations so that they may enjoy life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as legally defined by the founders. We shouldn't find ourselves fighting against rule of a corporatocracy by fictional personhoods and their henchmen.
People of this country, the way media show it, are embattled every damned day with corporate insurgencies on their land, health, national assets, constitutional rights. It's by design that populations are being worn down in state and local battles of attrition, and distracted and discouraged so much by such battles that they can't find a way to organize against the corporate war for national governance going on against them at the DC level.
The enemies of democracy are dispersed, and only a huge organization like the FBI has the means to locate them, amass evidence against them and rid this country of these predators.
Sometimes, winning the big visibility battles of Washington energizes the people, but until the FBI gives an accurate lay of the land about who is endangering our freedoms, we must create IF/THEN scenarios on how to act, since public voice hasn't been the real problem lately, but respect for, and action on behalf of that voice by the three branches of government has.
Every litmus test for every candidate should be what corporate entities' money they have accepted. One thing that helps is citizens' black list of donors, exposed in media and distributed across states.
= new reply since forum marked as read
