Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iowa candidate models how Democrats can win back working-class voters (Original Post) applegrove Sep 2017 OP
It's also voter turnout videohead5 Sep 2017 #1
And please don't forget the voting machines. stevepal Sep 2017 #2
I thought something was fishy videohead5 Sep 2017 #3
We live in an electronic world, now. But there should be a paper printout to verify. Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #5
Fuck the electronic world. Geezus! KPN Sep 2017 #8
Thanks for the kind words. Don't shoot the messenger. It ain't gonna happen. Period. nt Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #9
Long ad, but good. Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #4
Darn. I forgot to put a link. I will look for it. applegrove Sep 2017 #6
Here is the link. applegrove Sep 2017 #7

videohead5

(2,171 posts)
1. It's also voter turnout
Sat Sep 23, 2017, 07:31 PM
Sep 2017

In Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.Trump received less votes in 2016 than George Bush received in 2004 and Bush lost all 3 states.it was voter suppression helped by Russian propaganda.

 

stevepal

(109 posts)
2. And please don't forget the voting machines.
Sat Sep 23, 2017, 08:51 PM
Sep 2017

When you either can't or just don't VERIFY THE VOTE, there's no way to even know what the vote actually was, so there's no way to even make a statement about how the vote was split up among groups. You can't say ANYTHING about the vote if you can't verify what that vote actually was. The voting machines are easily hacked, easily intentionally programmed to spit out the percentage that the programmer wants, easily rigged in a hundred different ways. Hackers can come from any country, Russia has some very good ones, and just using information publicly available, hackers can easily hack into the machines, especially the central tabulators and rig elections.

Why not just go for HAND-COUNTED PAPER BALLOTS? It's cheaper in the long run, it's the gold standard in accuracy, it can give communities or election workers great pride to take part in a REAL ELECTION. Why not do it?

videohead5

(2,171 posts)
3. I thought something was fishy
Sat Sep 23, 2017, 09:41 PM
Sep 2017

Election night when the Detroit Free Press called Michigan for Hillary after sampling 80% of the precincts.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
5. We live in an electronic world, now. But there should be a paper printout to verify.
Sat Sep 23, 2017, 09:52 PM
Sep 2017

Altho if a machine flips a vote, then the paper printout would just show the resulting vote, I guess.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
4. Long ad, but good.
Sat Sep 23, 2017, 09:50 PM
Sep 2017

But about the small family farm instead of industry...that's not gonna happen, IMO. Industry brings big bucks, and not many people want to have a small farm. It doesn't pay and it's very risky & hard to make a living.

Sounds like she's for the $15 min. wage. Are Iowans in favor of that?

Good ad, though. Touches on a lot of issues. I guess this is an internet ad? Does she have a good chance of winning?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Iowa candidate models how...