Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

tomhagen

(3,604 posts) Tue May 22, 2018, 09:02 AM May 2018

Michael Moore: We are all participants in trumps never ending reality show

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Michael Moore: We are all participants in trumps never ending reality show (Original Post) tomhagen May 2018 OP

Yeah... Crutchez_CuiBono May 2018 #1

Wrong, he has written numerous books and made multiple movies about the state of our democracy. Bluepinky May 2018 #2

Uh yeah... Crutchez_CuiBono May 2018 #4

Mike lost me when he supported Nadir over Gore in 2000 WhiteTara May 2018 #3

Crutchez_CuiBono

(7,725 posts)

1. Yeah...

Reply to tomhagen (Original post)

Tue May 22, 2018, 09:11 AM

May 2018

Mikes lost my support. He has lots of grim predictions and seems to relish them rather than use his platform to inform us.

Bluepinky

(2,268 posts)

2. Wrong, he has written numerous books and made multiple movies about the state of our democracy.

Reply to Crutchez_CuiBono (Reply #1)

Tue May 22, 2018, 09:15 AM

May 2018

I don’t know what more he can do, short of running for public office.

Crutchez_CuiBono

(7,725 posts)

4. Uh yeah...

Reply to Bluepinky (Reply #2)

Tue May 22, 2018, 09:49 AM

May 2018

like I don't know Mikes bono fides. It's my opinion. Mike has cast some grim predictions in 2015-2017 and that was how I felt when he said them. I have Mikes movies.

WhiteTara

(29,703 posts)

3. Mike lost me when he supported Nadir over Gore in 2000

Reply to tomhagen (Original post)

Tue May 22, 2018, 09:47 AM

May 2018

and his actions helped bring about the destruction of today. Heck of a job, Mike.

Reply to this discussion