Debbie Dingell says Trump is right to threaten GM's subsidies

[DonViejo]

[Wellstone ruled]

1. Kind of late

is it not? GM was announcing these moves for quite some time via their 8k and 10k fillings. Ford has done the same. Chrysler Fiat the same.

Once these Companies got their Tax Break on repatriation of Capital,you could see this coming. Yes,there were certain Political types who were yelling to the roof tops,but the Corporate Media reported Crickets.

[LonePirate]

2. Cutting off corporate subsidies will play very well with voters, especially if they have cut jobs.

Dems would be wise not to publicly oppose this.

[A DAY IN THE LIFE]

3. Sure, lose more jobs

and bring the movement toward EV to a halt.

[LonePirate]

4. Cutting subsidies satisfies a primal need for revenge from laid off voters.

You are not going to counter that instinctive, animalistic need/urge with rational thought. It is best not to say anything if you are a Dem seeking an elected office and you disagree with cutting these subsidies.

[The Mouth]

5. Vengeance is a GOOD thing when applied to corporate executives

I'm quite alright with giving all executive officers of any corporation laying off more than 10 people the choice between disenfranchisement with a good beating and subsequent expulsion from the US or hanging.


People who lay off other people are traitors, they should get the full measure of wrath from both the people and the government.

Sometimes pitchforks and torches are too good for them; closing a plant while still having one in any other country is sufficient.

Terrorize the bastards.

[LonePirate]

6. I'm not advocating for or against removing the subsidies. I'm opining why Dems should stay silent.

[The Mouth]

7. I say outdo 'em

out these bastards, tar and feather them. Show the pubbies how to really deal with these scum.

I hate corporations, I want every officer and shareholder of any corporation to pay jointly and severally for any misdeeds, bear the brunt of public outrage and fear for their lives.