Trump Aide Who Cooperated: 'Bad Things' Coming In Mueller Report The Beat With Ari Melber MSNBC

[Quixote1818]

&t=71s

[Cracklin Charlie]

1. Kick

Can’t watch now.

[Jarqui]

2. They were still questioning people two weeks ago about collusion

according to Page and Caputo. And these same people try to dismiss it as Mueller just "crossing the t's and doting the i's" on collusion - that there was no evidence of collusion?

Not finding evidence of a crime beyond reasonable doubt (when you're being obstructed) is a heck of a lot different than finding absolutely no evidence. The truth of the matter is that they had plenty of evidence to keep them more than curious for more than two years. I'll bet, like many others, they still think they colluded (conspired) - they just couldn't prove it.

[erronis]

3. rec to show I watched the whole show. And now I feel dirty with the slime-bags (Page/Caputo)

getting to spew their mucosal opinions.

[Ramsey Barner]

4. Start at 12:08

and save 12 minutes of your life.

Michael Caputo: "I think it'll be a mixed bag; they'll be some bad things in there too."

[Perseus]

5. Why do they keep repeating the Muller probe found no proof of collusion?

No one has seen the Muller report besides Barr, and I assume that he being the orange buffoon's pet that he has shown it to the orange buffoon, so that line that the orange buffoon has not seen it? I don't buy it.

The only one who has stated there was no proof of collusion is Barr, why should we believe Barr if we know he is conspiring with the orange buffoon to keep the Muller report hidden?

I wish MSNBC would stop saying that "no proof of collusion was found", we really do not know that, let us see the Muller report then we can make our own minds about it, the Congress can make their own minds about it.

"Russia, I hope you are listening..." That is collusion/conspiracy anywhere in the World, just because it is in the open should not exonerate anyone from conspiracy charges.

[Honeycombe8]

6. If he'd found a conspiracy....

he would have indicted someone in the Trump team, if not many of them. So people are assuming that what evidence there is didn't rise to the level of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

No "proof" of collusion (Mueller would call it conspiring or aiding and abetting, or some legal term) doesn't mean no evidence at all. It means no proof that could reasonably lead to a guilty verdict.

So there is evidence of certain behaviors. But that's not necessarily legal proof of conspiracy. That's my interpretation. But the public thinks there is no evidence, when they hear people say that, I'm sure.

[Honeycombe8]

7. The DOJ is going to redact anything that's bad in a meaningful way.

And this video doesn't say much for the first 12 or so minutes. These guys aren't saying anything we haven't heard before.