Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 07:42 PM Jan 2013

I can't imagine having to fight to keep a foreign company from taking my land without permission.

That's seems to be what's happening in Texas right now. That's what Eleanor Fairchild was doing in October when she was arrested on her own property for protesting TransCanada’s construction of its Gulf Coast tar-sands pipeline.

But she had been fighting this intrusion on her property for a while. This video was uploaded March 2011.



Here is more from October this year when she and Darryl Hannah were arrested.

Texas grandmother arrested for trespassing on her own land to protest Keystone



Who’s Eleanor Fairchild? No one you’ve heard of. The important part isn’t who she is, it’s why she was arrested and where she was when it happened. Fairchild was arrested for trespassing. And when it happened, she was standing on her own property.

.."The pipeline being built is the last stretch of a connection from Alberta to the Gulf Coast. After the government signed off on construction, TransCanada moved quickly to secure right-of-way. In the process, it has faced strong resistance from landowners. Even some who signed lease deals with TransCanada believe the company misrepresented its intent. And when landowners wouldn’t sign deals, TransCanada successfully persuaded Texas to seize private land for the project.

That’s exactly what happened to Fairchild. According to TarSandsBlockade.org, Fairchild “never signed a contract with the Canadian pipeline company, who, in turn, proceeded to expropriate her ranch through Texas’ lax eminent domain legal proceedings.” In the eyes of the state of Texas, the land, condemned, isn’t Fairchild’s. Fairchild seems justifiably inclined to disagree.


Please note the company's statement about their arrest. They referred to out-of-state activists who were choosing to break the law.

“It is unfortunate Ms. Hannah and other out-of-state activists have chosen to break the law by illegally trespassing on private property,” David Dodson, a spokesman for TransCanada, said in an email. He also said protesters were “putting their own safety and the safety of others at risk.”


I know this has been written about here before, but I ran across this video of Eleanor Fairchild and her fight to keep her land. She mentions that 87 acres of her land will no longer be accessible to her.

Kudos to her for trying.

There is a good post in the comments section. Seems once again the world is watching.

We read about you in the big national papers in Sweden, Europe, and I think that you are such a brave woman!

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I can't imagine having to fight to keep a foreign company from taking my land without permission. (Original Post) madfloridian Jan 2013 OP
This pipeline and its proponents are monstrosities. Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #1
No guarantees who gets the oil. madfloridian Jan 2013 #2
So glad we have a Democrat in the White House who is fighting this UnrepentantLiberal Jan 2013 #3
And when these cases get to the Supreme Court - it is the Republican Justices who truedelphi Jan 2013 #9
All 87 acres? momsrule Jan 2013 #4
87 acres OF HER LAND. She must have more than that. nt Tigress DEM Jan 2013 #6
She had about 300 acres I think. Pipeline will cut her access to 87 acres. madfloridian Jan 2013 #7
Eminent ***king Domain laws being misused.... abused. Tigress DEM Jan 2013 #5
Post removed Post removed Jan 2013 #8
Boston Globe article about the protest at the TransCanada office on the 7th Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #10
I hate that they are now behind a firewall. madfloridian Jan 2013 #13
Oh, sorry. I saw this tweet go by right after reading this OP and though to add it Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #14
This should anger Republicans and Democrats alike! Dustlawyer Jan 2013 #11
A lot of good points in your post. madfloridian Jan 2013 #12
Oil leak - that was my first thought, too. CrispyQ Jan 2013 #17
From the Independent UK in Dec...some protestors must pay $65,000 fine. madfloridian Jan 2013 #15
Just Ricky P earning his keep El Shaman Jan 2013 #16
Ricky P has had an oversized influence on Texas. madfloridian Jan 2013 #18

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
9. And when these cases get to the Supreme Court - it is the Republican Justices who
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 10:12 PM
Jan 2013

Are more likely to side with the homeowner, or original property owner!

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
7. She had about 300 acres I think. Pipeline will cut her access to 87 acres.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 09:34 PM
Jan 2013

It's near the end of the video. She won't be allowed to build a road across or anything to give her access. The company was asked to replant trees and grasses she uses for feed, but they refused.

Response to madfloridian (Original post)

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
14. Oh, sorry. I saw this tweet go by right after reading this OP and though to add it
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 03:03 AM
Jan 2013

and didn't click through.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
11. This should anger Republicans and Democrats alike!
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 10:59 PM
Jan 2013

This Canadian company will provide jobs to build the thing. Those will only last so long. It will be the nastiest oil, which would wreak havoc much worse than the already terrible crude (see Gulf of Mexico). This oil sinks by itself in water making cleanup next to impossible (BP sunk theirs to hide it so it could not be pick up and fined by the barrel, they don't care about what it is doing to all life in the Gulf). All of the major and most of the minor pipeline companies have had leaks in their pipes. The ones that haven't, they haven't because they have not been in business long enough. They all have leaks because crude and shale oil has corrosive components that over time, thin the pipe. Pipe maintenance costs money, but the real cost is changing out the pipe. Most companies start with a band aid approach and some just let it ride hoping they will either sell it later. Others just ignore it until it has a major rupture. Bottom line, none are willing to spend the money!
The other big issue is that they can do this to an American citizen. They had to make no concessions, and I am sure they did not pay full values. How much did the appraised value drop when the property is split almost in half, and the two halves are not connected?
This oil will be refined on the Texas Gulf Coast. They would not have to add much capacity or jobs to handle the extra oil. They have already been expanding due to a dramatic increase in drilling in the U.S. and the Gulf. The oil will be sold on the world market, with the majority of it going to China. Texas fights for oil rights like the NRA fights for guns, extreme! I am sure she does not stand a chance under our laws and that is a crying shame!

CrispyQ

(36,457 posts)
17. Oil leak - that was my first thought, too.
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 04:51 PM
Jan 2013

The land looks so beautiful from the photo. The 85 acres will be ruined & how much more if the pipe leaks.

Everything for profit. Everything for profit. Everything for profit.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
15. From the Independent UK in Dec...some protestors must pay $65,000 fine.
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 12:54 PM
Jan 2013

This is one of the few updates I have seen on this. Seems like it was forgotten back in Oct.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/keystone-protesters-pay-a-high-price-for-dangling-in-texas-trees-8426627.html

"Protesters sitting in trees or blocking equipment used to build the Keystone XL oil pipeline are learning that environmental activism can be a ticket to lengthy jail time in East Texas.

Matthew Almonte, Glen Collins and Isabel Brooks landed in jail in Tyler on Dec. 3, charged with misdemeanor criminal trespass, resisting arrest and illegal dumping, following efforts to stop work on the TransCanada pipeline. Each has asked for a reduction in the $65,000 bond that must be posted to get out pending trial, without success.

The much higher bail amounts set for Almonte, Collins and Brooks, by a judge in Smith County, a two-hour drive east of Dallas, has raised questions of fairness.

"If they've been charged with misdemeanors and don't have prior criminal records, $65,000 bond is ridiculously high," said Brandon Baade, a criminal defense lawyer in Tyler."

The article states that Fairchild's late husband was an oil exec for Hunt Oil in Dallas.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»I can't imagine having to...