Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:10 AM
Meadowoak (3,750 posts)
Knowing what we know now, about the Russian hacking, does that shed any new light on the DU
Hack on election day? Was it directed by Putin? Any thoughts.
|
42 replies, 5503 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Meadowoak | Jul 2018 | OP |
Dr Hobbitstein | Jul 2018 | #1 | |
applegrove | Jul 2018 | #3 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Jul 2018 | #5 | |
applegrove | Jul 2018 | #6 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Jul 2018 | #8 | |
applegrove | Jul 2018 | #10 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Jul 2018 | #11 | |
applegrove | Jul 2018 | #12 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Jul 2018 | #14 | |
applegrove | Jul 2018 | #15 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Jul 2018 | #16 | |
bearsfootball516 | Jul 2018 | #19 | |
applegrove | Jul 2018 | #32 | |
LisaM | Jul 2018 | #26 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Jul 2018 | #36 | |
LisaM | Jul 2018 | #38 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Jul 2018 | #39 | |
LisaM | Jul 2018 | #41 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Jul 2018 | #42 | |
Hoyt | Jul 2018 | #27 | |
Raster | Jul 2018 | #30 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Jul 2018 | #37 | |
Hekate | Jul 2018 | #17 | |
wishstar | Jul 2018 | #33 | |
Hekate | Jul 2018 | #34 | |
AlexSFCA | Jul 2018 | #2 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Jul 2018 | #4 | |
applegrove | Jul 2018 | #9 | |
fierywoman | Jul 2018 | #7 | |
demmiblue | Jul 2018 | #21 | |
Meadowoak | Jul 2018 | #13 | |
Hekate | Jul 2018 | #18 | |
demmiblue | Jul 2018 | #20 | |
PJMcK | Jul 2018 | #22 | |
Meadowoak | Jul 2018 | #23 | |
applegrove | Jul 2018 | #24 | |
red dog 1 | Jul 2018 | #25 | |
red dog 1 | Jul 2018 | #28 | |
Raster | Jul 2018 | #29 | |
MFM008 | Jul 2018 | #31 | |
jpak | Jul 2018 | #35 | |
Generic Brad | Jul 2018 | #40 |
Response to Meadowoak (Original post)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:13 AM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
1. Highly unlikely.
DU is a small blip and I can guarantee you it’s not on Putin’s radar.
|
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #1)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:16 AM
applegrove (111,027 posts)
3. It was on someone's radar. That is for sure. We did get russian trolls all over
Discussionist in the lead up to the 2016 election. So little sites were on the Russia's radar.
|
Response to applegrove (Reply #3)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:18 AM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
5. That's because DI is a RW cesspool.
ETA the hack wasn’t very sophisticated, and was quite juvenile. I’d suspect a jilted former user or some script kiddie from the cave/DI/freeperville.
|
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #5)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:25 AM
applegrove (111,027 posts)
6. Could easily have been Russia. A good intelligence operation would look juvenile as cover.
We Don't know but the Russians were here. They just figured out that if they spoke like Russians or alt fighters or right wingers they would get booted off. Any idea who masterminded jackpine radical lemming march off the DU?
|
Response to applegrove (Reply #6)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:33 AM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
8. Meh, we're a community of a couple thousand.
Yeah, 240,000 user registrations, but a SMALL fraction of them are active.
What they did with Facebook/Twitter/Reddit, that was their MO. A site with no real world impact? Why bother. JPR was “masterminded” by a couple disgruntled BoBers who felt their right to call Hillary a c**t was being trampled on. Many were long time DUers. Taking down our site for a couple days accomplished nothing. |
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #8)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:37 AM
applegrove (111,027 posts)
10. We get much busier when there is news or an election. No doubt the growth of
Facebook, Twitter and Reddit over the years has taken traffic that would have come to us. But we are important. I see lots of stuff on the MSM that DU talked about before hand. We are ahead of the news cycle and though that does not mean they are following us it does not mean they are not.
|
Response to applegrove (Reply #10)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:42 AM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
11. I've been here awhile.
Facebook/twitter/reddit is where big political discussion happens. This is mostly an echo chamber for Democrats, which is cool. But it’s a handfull of people (in relation to the US voting populace) and skews towards older demographics.
We’re not that important. |
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #11)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:43 AM
applegrove (111,027 posts)
12. Stop saying that. We are statistically significant group of democrats
(with a few trolls).
|
Response to applegrove (Reply #12)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:46 AM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
14. Saying what? That DU has no real world impact?
It’s true. I love this site, don’t get me wrong, but it’s no more influential on the real world than MyLesPaul.com
|
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #14)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:46 AM
applegrove (111,027 posts)
15. Well you are wrong.
Response to applegrove (Reply #15)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:49 AM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
16. Ok. nt
Response to applegrove (Reply #15)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 06:14 AM
bearsfootball516 (6,341 posts)
19. I have to agree with Dr here.
DU is a great place to talk, but it’s statistically irrelevant on a nationwide scale. Go ask 10,000 people if they have ever heard of DU and you’ll likely get 0 saying yes.
|
Response to bearsfootball516 (Reply #19)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 02:44 PM
applegrove (111,027 posts)
32. Well we are ahead of the curb on the news. We'll have to disagree.
Response to applegrove (Reply #10)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 02:27 PM
LisaM (27,006 posts)
26. DU is generally ahead of the curve.
I think it's often ahead of Twitter. I don't bother with Reddit.
|
Response to LisaM (Reply #26)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 07:33 PM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
36. Ahead of what curve?
I’ve never ONCE come across breaking news on DU that was ahead of facebook/twitter/broadcast news.
This is a SMALL site of little consequence. |
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #36)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 07:59 PM
LisaM (27,006 posts)
38. It's a decent-sized site, and I always see things here ahead of Facebook.
Sometimes things come here via Twitter, but I don't love Twitter; would far rather read a whole article. I don't care for Reddit. But I almost always see things here first.
|
Response to LisaM (Reply #38)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 08:47 PM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
39. No,it's a VERY small site that skews to an older demographic.
DU has never broken any major news. And I always find LBN to be at least an hour behind my facebook feed.
DU represents LESS than 0.1% (percentage based on number of registrations, not active posters) of the voting populace of the US. We are, statistically, insignificant. |
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #39)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 11:09 PM
LisaM (27,006 posts)
41. I get it, you find it irrelevant.
Enough to say it over and over!
|
Response to LisaM (Reply #41)
Wed Jul 18, 2018, 06:21 AM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
42. I don't find it irrelevant, it IS irrelevant.
Facebook/twitter/reddit have billions of users. We have thousands. Statistically irrelevant.
Like I said, I love this site, but it's a small echo chamber, nothing more. To pretend otherwise is dishonest. |
Response to applegrove (Reply #6)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 02:31 PM
Hoyt (54,770 posts)
27. Not sure about Russia, but definitely someone with the intent to disrupt Democrats.
JPRs, white wingers in DI, Russians are all about the same.
|
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #5)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 02:36 PM
Raster (20,958 posts)
30. 4-chan script kiddies...
...there was actually bragging about the hack about a week or so afterward.
|
Response to Raster (Reply #30)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 07:36 PM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
37. Indeed there was...
But evidence is useless when you have a delusion of grandeur conspiracy theory.
|
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #1)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 02:45 AM
Hekate (81,646 posts)
17. What I find interesting is that somebody cared enough to vandalize a well-constructed site...
...and all but destroy it. They tried hard to destroy us. Somebody had to care enough to do that--whether it was alt-right hatred or just a little demonstration on the side from one of Russia's hacking groups, I have no way of knowing.
It had the feel of someone saying: See how casually we can disrupt you? Within the same period of time a Congressional hearing or meeting being broadcast on CSPAN was flipped to the RT newsroom. You know them, right? It happened the moment someone in the meeting said "Russia." How did that happen? Why? What earthly connection could there be between the two locations? Again, that feeling of: See how easy? It's not about inflating the importance of DU in the grand scheme of things, it's about America. All of our infrastructure is vulnerable. With apologies to John Donne, DU is only a part of the continent, a piece of the main -- but like CSPAN, the continent we are a part of is America. |
Response to Hekate (Reply #17)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 06:24 PM
wishstar (4,981 posts)
33. CSPAN flipping to RT happened right when Maxine Waters was warning about Russia
Seems like it stayed on RT for close to 20 minutes and was never satisfactorily explained and certainly deliberate mischief .
|
Response to wishstar (Reply #33)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 06:49 PM
Hekate (81,646 posts)
34. Thanks for refreshing my memory. That was what made me believe DU's pain wasn't just mischief...
...or a bit of well-constructed vandalism by DU's opponents on the far-right.
|
Response to Meadowoak (Original post)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:14 AM
AlexSFCA (6,081 posts)
2. it absolutely is on putin's radar
look at the recent DU wiki page hack. This forum has been discussing treason for well over a year. I see no reason to believe our weren't russian hackers who did it to us on election day. I remember that day clearly and when I tried to access DU and couldnt, I immidiatey had a gut feeling that the election is being hacked and trump is gonna win.
|
Response to AlexSFCA (Reply #2)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:17 AM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
4. What DU wiki hack?
You mean the wikipedia page that has been the same for the past 4 years?
The guitar message board I’m on has more users. We are a very small community with very little influence. |
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #4)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:35 AM
applegrove (111,027 posts)
9. The russians were here. They could have done it. DU is obviously an important
Democratic asset on election day, when there is a partial blackout on political information and sites like the DU can keep the Democratic message alive. Someone republican or Russian went to much trouble to attack us. We matter. That is the message we should take out of it.
|
Response to AlexSFCA (Reply #2)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:25 AM
fierywoman (6,763 posts)
7. me too -- same gut feeling.
Response to AlexSFCA (Reply #2)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 06:38 AM
demmiblue (35,201 posts)
21. It wasn't a hack... anyone can change a wikipedia page.
It was probably a knuckle-dragger from DI.
|
Response to Meadowoak (Original post)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:44 AM
Meadowoak (3,750 posts)
13. I would definitely say that Russian intelligence used DU to find
Out what we were planning, what our fears were, and were we were vulnerable then took all that information and used it against us.
|
Response to Meadowoak (Reply #13)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 02:49 AM
Hekate (81,646 posts)
18. I should have responded to you directly -- see my post #17
Response to Meadowoak (Original post)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 06:29 AM
demmiblue (35,201 posts)
20. No, DU doesn't really have that much website traffic in order to be considered a good target. n/t
Response to Meadowoak (Original post)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 07:15 AM
PJMcK (19,570 posts)
22. Who cares?
The real threat from Russia is if they can affect vote counting and voter registrations. This is to say that there could be other cyber targets such as airlines, power grids and other public services. Those would have a national impact.
Knocking DU offline for a few weeks didn't have any effect on the 2016 elections. After all, all of us voted for Democratic candidates, right? |
Response to Meadowoak (Original post)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 08:03 AM
Meadowoak (3,750 posts)
23. DU is. Certainly a good resource, if you wanted to learn about Democrats, get inside their heads
And see what we were up to. I know there are other, larger sites, but these are the smartest. The other sites seem kinda shallow in comparison. Just my opinion.
|
Response to Meadowoak (Reply #23)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:50 PM
applegrove (111,027 posts)
24. Exactly. It is an insightful incubator of Democratic thinking. Otherwise why would it have
been targeted. Why are there troll armies here starting trouble all the time.
|
Response to Meadowoak (Original post)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 02:35 PM
red dog 1 (24,857 posts)
28. Anything's possible.
Putin is as evil as Spanky, and hacking into DU wouldn't have been hard to do.
For those who doubt this, go check other, smaller websites to see the activities of Putin's troll army. For example: https://www.similarworlds.com [You can "browse" without joining] |
Response to Meadowoak (Original post)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 02:35 PM
Raster (20,958 posts)
29. DU was NOT a Russian hack...
...it was an effort by certain malcontents at 4-chan and Reddits the_Donald.
Sorry, DU conspiracy theorists... If it truly were Russian hacking, it would have been far more professional, which it was not. It looked like it was a product of a group of very smart 17-19-year-old script kiddies, little MAGA wannabes. Second, the professional Russian FSB/GRU hackers would NEVER hack something as insignificant (in the overall scheme of things) as DU. It would be a waste of Russian resources and leave the Russian infrastructure open to discovery. Nope, that was a 4-chan special. |
Response to Meadowoak (Original post)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 02:42 PM
MFM008 (19,692 posts)
31. You never know
But it was planned by someone.
|
Response to Meadowoak (Original post)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 06:54 PM
jpak (41,282 posts)
35. To my knowledge, the admins have never commented on it.
Other than progress on restoring DU.
I will not speculate - but I would like to think "they did the right thing". ![]() |
Response to Meadowoak (Original post)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 09:27 PM
Generic Brad (13,936 posts)
40. We were micro-targeted
They stirred up all the Hillary/Bernie nonsense to divide us and discourage some of us from going to the polls.
We are still being micro-targeted by some of their tolls. |