The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsSeattleVet
(5,477 posts)"Let's eat, Grandma!"
vs.
"Let's eat Grandma!"
Wednesdays
(17,306 posts)(I added the correct punctuation, which were missing in the originals.)
"Ride On, King Jesus"
"Come, Let Us Eat" - - Susan Johnson
Stuart G
(38,403 posts),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
yes for the ,
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)Oxford commas are the only sensible way to go!
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)I only use Oxford Commas(tm)
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)question everything
(47,425 posts)from my usual one?
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)and appears before the "and" in the sentence.
In "modern" times, the tendency has been to eliminate it; however, proponents argue that its usage is clearer and more sensible in a sentence structure.
Keep in mind, any comma indicates a pause.
For example:
I am going on vacation with my sisters, Michael, and Jim. (Oxford Comma)
vs:
I am going on vacation with my sisters, Michael and Jim. (Modern rendition)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Oxford version, the list is obvious: my sisters, (pause) Michael, (pause) and Jim.
In the modern version, it appears that the sisters' names are being described as Michael and Jim, which doesn't make a lot of sense...my sisters, (pause) Michael and Jim.
It is named as the "Oxford Comma" after Oxford University Press, which preferred its usage.
question everything
(47,425 posts)because I thought this was the correct way. But I do like the Oxford one and will be using it from now on.
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)Thank you for being so receptive to it. I think you'll find that it does have a significant purpose, and now you can pass it on to someone else.
I see that you live up to your Username.
"Bring back the Oxford Comma!"