Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuffer

(40 posts)
Sun Dec 9, 2018, 03:31 PM Dec 2018

Cursive

My grandson is in second grade...he will be taught cursive in 3rd grade...children need to learn to write !
When the electrical grid goes down what is there?
My other peeve is Common Core math...what idiot thought that up? Instead of adding 1 + 1 = 2...the kids now have to give 3 ways to get the answer ...the answer is still 2! Higher thinking my ass!

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

True Dough

(17,302 posts)
2. Oops! This is about cursive writing
Sun Dec 9, 2018, 03:38 PM
Dec 2018

Probably not LuckyCharm's area of expertise. But I stand to be corrected!

hlthe2b

(102,227 posts)
3. I have a real intensive anger at those who would not teach children to write in cursive...
Sun Dec 9, 2018, 03:40 PM
Dec 2018

Starting with the very demonstrable benefit doing so does for strengthening hand-eye coordination, neural circuitry and brain function. We do children no favors by denying them this exercise.

But, there is one undeniable fact that takes away ANY and ALL justification--no matter how well-meaning, yet abysmally ignorant the proponent for doing so. Denying children the ability to learn to read and write in cursive is to take away all ability to read their own parents and grandparents letters and documents in their own hand, not to mention the ability to read the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution and innumerable historical documents that have made us who we are.

I'll leave it there. It angers me so much that there is an ignorance within our education system that has promoted this as policy that I will not respond to anyone trying to justify the decision.

drray23

(7,627 posts)
5. Apparently you have not read the post.
Sun Dec 9, 2018, 03:51 PM
Dec 2018

There are clear benefits in learning to write in cursive. Likewise, learning to spell and use grammar properly or become practiced at adding, multiplying, etc.. in your head. Nowadays this tends to be neglected in school.

trev

(1,480 posts)
6. Writing is a left-brain function
Sun Dec 9, 2018, 03:59 PM
Dec 2018

… associated--naturally enough--with language. It does nothing for our right-brain capabilities. Typing, OTOH, uses both sides.

We need more right-brain activity. Without it, we can't truly understand the nature of the Cosmos.

I quit writing in cursive when I was a freshman in high school. I printed or typed all of my school papers, no matter how long they were. In fact, I didn't just print the assignments, I wrote them in italics. To this day, I cannot read my own cursive.



hlthe2b

(102,227 posts)
7. You really need to educate yourself more on this (less technical references at the bottom)
Sun Dec 9, 2018, 04:10 PM
Dec 2018
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274624/
References
1. Anderson S, Damasia A, Damasio H. Troubled letters but not numbers: domain specific cognitive impairments following focal damage in frontal cortex. Brain. 1990;113 49–60. [PubMed]
2. Andersen RA, Asanuma C, Essick G, Siegel RM. Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2004;296:65–113. [PubMed]
3. Basso A, Taborelli A, Vignolo LA. Dissociated disorders of speaking and writing in aphasia. Journal of Nuerology and Neurosurgery psychiatry. 1978;41:556–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Brain L. Speech disorders: aphasia, apraxia and agnosia. London: Butter-worth; 1967.
5. Bader LA. Bader reading and language inventory. 5. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2005.
6. Beauregard M, et al. The neural substrate for concrete, abstract, and emotional word lexica: a positron emission tomography study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1997;9:441–61. [PubMed]
7. Beery KE, Beery NA. The Beery–Buktenica developmental test of visual–motor integration. 5. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson; 2006.
8. Bolger P, Borgwaldt SR, Jakab E. Letter and grapheme perception in English and Dutch. Written Language and Literacy. 2009;12:116–39.
9. Botvinick M, Cohen JD, Carter CS. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends in Cognitive Science. 2004;8(12):539–46. [PubMed]
10. Botvinick M, Nystrom LE, Fissell K, Carter CS, Cohen JD. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature. 1999;402:178–81. [PubMed]
11. Burgund ED, et al. The feasibility of a common stereotactic space for children and adults in fMRI studies of development. NeuroImage. 2002;17:184–200. [PubMed]
12. Catts HW, Fey ME, Zhang X, Tomblin JB. Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: a research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 2001;32:38–50.
13. Cohen L, et al. The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain. 2000;123:291–307. [PubMed]
14. Cohen MS. Handedness questionnaire. 2008 retrieved from: < http://www.brainmapping.org/shared/Edinburgh.php#>.
15. Christman S, Kitterle FL, Hellige J. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of absolute versus relative spatial frequency. Brain and Cognition. 1991;16:62–73. [PubMed]
16. Dehaene S. Reading in the brain. NY: Penguin Group; 2009.
17. Dehaene S, et al. The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus. Neuroreport. 2002;13:321–5. [PubMed]
18. Dehaene S, et al. Letter binding and invariant recognition of masked words: behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Psychological Science. 2004;15:307–13. [PubMed]
19. Duvernoy HM, Bourgouin P. The human brain: surface, three-dimensional sectional anatomy with MRI, and blood supply. Springer; 1999.
20. Flowers DL, Jones K, Noble K, VanMeter J, Zeffiro TA, Wood FB, et al. Attention to single letters activates left extrastriate cortex. Neuroimage. 2004;21:829–39. [PubMed]
21. Foulin JN. Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing. 2005;18:129–55.
22. Freyd JJ. Representing the dynamics of a static form. Memory and Cognition. 1983;11:342–6. [PubMed]
23. Gaillard WD, Grandin CB, Xu B. Developmental aspects of pediatric fMRI: considerations for image acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. Neuro-Image. 2001;13:239–49. [PubMed]
24. Garrett AS, et al. Cortical activity related to accuracy of letter recognition. Neuroimage. 2000;11:111–23. [PubMed]
25. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Anderson AW, Skudlarski P, Gore JC. Activation of the middle fusiform: face area increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience. 1999;2(6):568–73. [PubMed]
26. Gauthier I, Skudlarski P, Gore JC, Anderson AW. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience. 2000;3(2):191–7. [PubMed]
27. Goldstone RL. Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1994;123:178–200. [PubMed]
28. Goldstone RL, Hendrickson AT. Categorical perception. Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. 2010;1:65–78.
29. Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement assessment batteryfor children—2. Strand, London: Pearson; 2007.
30. Ivry RB, Robertson LC. The two sides of perception. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1998.
31. James KH. Sensori-motor experience leads to changes in visual processing in the developing brain. Developmental Science. 2010;13:279–88. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. James KH, Atwood TP. The role of sensorimotor learning in the perception of letter-like forms: tracking the causes of neural specialization for letters. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2009;26 1–110. [PubMed]
33. James KH, Gauthier I. Letter processing automatically recruits a sensory-motor brain network. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44:2937–49. [PubMed]
34. James KH, James TW, Jobard G, Wong CAN, Gauthier I. Letter processing in the visual system: different activation patterns for single letters and strings. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2005;5:452–66. [PubMed]
35. James TW, James KH. Expert individuation of objects increases activation in the fusiform face area of children. NeuroImage. in press. [PubMed]
36. Johnson MH. Functional brain development in infants: elements of an interactive specialization framework. Child Development. 2000;71 5–81. [PubMed]
37. Johnson MH. Interactive specialization: a domain-general framework for human functional brain development? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 2010;1:1–30. [PubMed]
38. Kang HC, Burgun ED, Lugar HM, Petersen SE, Schlaggar BL. Comparison of functional activation foci in children and adults using a common stereotactic space. NeuroImage. 2003;19:16–28. [PubMed]
39. Katanoda K, Yoshikawa K, Sugishita M. A functional MRI study on the neural substrates for writing. Human Brain Mapping. 2001;13:34–42. [PubMed]
40. Kimchi R. Primacy of holistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:24–38. [PubMed]
41. Longcamp M, Anton JL, Roth M, Velay JL. Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing. Neuroimage. 2003;19:1492–500. [PubMed]
42. Longcamp M, Anton J-L, Roth M, Velay J-L. Premotor activations in respnse to visually presented single letters depends on the hand used to write: a study on left-handers. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(12):1801–9. [PubMed]
43. Longcamp M, Zerbato-Poudou MT, Velay JL. The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: a comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychologica. 2005;119:67–79. [PubMed]
44. Longcamp M, Boucard C, Gilhodes JC, Velay JL. Remembering the orientation of newly learned characters depends on the associated writing knowledge: a comparison between handwriting and typing. Human Movement Science. 2006;25:646–56. [PubMed]
45. Lonigan CJ, Burgess SR, Anthony JL. Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology. 2000;36:596–613. [PubMed]
46. Lubrano V, Roux F-E, Demonet J-F. Writing-specific sites in frontal areas: a cortical stimulation study. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2004;101 87–98. [PubMed]
47. Matsuo K, Nakai T, Kato C, Moriya T, Isoda H, Takehara Y, et al. Dissociation of writing processes: functional magnetic resonance imaging during writing of Japanese ideographic characters. Cognitive Brain Research. 2000;9:281–6. [PubMed]
48. McCandliss BD, Cohen L, Dehaene S. The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003;7:293–9. [PubMed]
49. McManus IC, Sik G, Cole DR, Mellon AF, Wong J, Kloss J. The development of handedness in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 1988;6:257–73.
50. Menon V, Desmond JE. Left superior parietal cortex involvement in writing: integrating fMRI with lesion evidence. Cognitive Brain Research. 2001;12:337–40. [PubMed]
51. Milner AD, Goodale MA. The visual brain in action. USA: Oxford University Press; 2006.
52. O’Connor RE, Jenkins JR. Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Study of Reading. 1999;3:159–97.
53. Pernet C, Celsis P, Demonet JF. Selective response to letter categorization within the left fusiform gyrus. Neuroimage. 2005;28 38–44. [PubMed]
54. Perry LK, Samuelson LK, Malloy LM, Schiffler RN. Learn locally, think globally: exemplar variability supports higher-order generalization and word learning. Psychological Science. 2010;21:1894–902. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Posner MI, Keele SW. On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1968;77(3):353–63. [PubMed]
56. Pulvermuller F, Harle M, Hummel F. Walking or talking: behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain and Language. 2001;78:143–68. [PubMed]
57. Rapp BC, Caramazza A. Letter processing in reading and spelling: some dissociations. Reading and Writing. 1989;1:3–23.
58. Richards TL, Berninger VW, Stock P, Altemeier L, Trivedi P, Maravilla KR. Differences between good and poor writers on fMRI contrasts for writing newly taught and highly practiced letter forms. Reading and Writing. 2011;24:493–516.
59. Rushworth MFS, Nixon PD, Paaingham RE. The parietal cortex and movement: I. movement selection and reaching. Experimental Brain Research. 1997;117:292–310. [PubMed]
60. Rushworth MFS, Krams M, Passingham RE. The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: the distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2001;13(5):698–710. [PubMed]
61. Sanoki T, Dyson M. Letter processing and font information during reading, beyond distinctiveness, where vision meets design. Perception & Psychophysics. 2012;74:132–45. [PubMed]
62. Schlagger BL, McCandliss BD. Development of neural systems for reading. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2007;30:475–503. [PubMed]
63. Schoonbaert S, Grainger J. Letter position coding in written word perception: effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language & Cognitive Processes. 2004;19:333–7.
64. Seger CA, Poldrack RA, Prabhakaran V, Zhao M, Glover GH, Gabrieli JDE. Hemispheric asymmetries and individual differences in visual concept learning as measured by functional MRI. Neuopsychologia. 2000;38:1316–24. [PubMed]
65. Seitz RJ, Canavan AGM, Yaguez L, Herzog H, Tellmann L, Knorr U, et al. Representations of graphomotor trajectories in the human parietal cortex: evidence for controlled processing and automatic performance. European Journal of Neuroscience. 1997;9(2):378–89. [PubMed]
66. Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA. Paying attention to reading: the neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Development and Psychobiology. 2008;20:1329–49. [PubMed]
67. Stage SA, Sheppard J, Davidson MM, Browning MM. Prediction of first-graders’ growth in oral reading fluency using kindergarten letter fluency. Journal of School Psychology. 2001;39:225–37.
68. Swaminathan SK, Freeman DJ. Preferential encoding of visual categories in parietal cortex compared with prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 2012;15:315–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme; 1988.
70. Vogel AC, Miezin FM, Petersen SE, Schlagger BL. The putative visual word form area is functionally connected to the dorsal attention network. Cerebral Cortex. 2011;22(3):537–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Here is more "lay literature" from the MSM if you prefer a less technical explanation:

https://www.labroots.com/trending/neuroscience/8151/cursive-writing-brain
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/memory-medic/201303/why-writing-hand-could-make-you-smarter
https://blog.brainbalancecenters.com/2014/09/brain-benefits-write-in-cursive
http://nautil.us/issue/40/learning/cursive-handwriting-and-other-education-myths
http://www.cursivelogic.com/why-cursive/
http://davidsortino.blogs.pressdemocrat.com/10221/brain-research-and-cursive-writing/
https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/04/30/should-schools-require-children-to-learn-cursive/the-benefits-of-cursive-go-beyond-writing
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274624/

trev

(1,480 posts)
12. hm
Sun Dec 9, 2018, 06:53 PM
Dec 2018

Not sure what your point is, since some of your references confirm my post.

I'm not against handwriting. I'm just not convinced cursive is all that important for brain development.

hlthe2b

(102,227 posts)
13. Didn't bother to read any of them, did you? well, so be it.
Sun Dec 9, 2018, 06:55 PM
Dec 2018

I thought most of us respected education and knowledge unlike our opponents. Perhaps not.

trev

(1,480 posts)
15. I'm a college graduate
Sun Dec 9, 2018, 07:13 PM
Dec 2018
magna cum laude, a published author, and a computer programmer. Not writing in cursive never affected any of this.

My brain is just fine, thank you.

The Polack MSgt

(13,186 posts)
8. I agree that cursive should still be taught
Sun Dec 9, 2018, 04:32 PM
Dec 2018

But I cannot disagree strongly enough about the math.

At this age teaching math is mostly about establishing habits of thought.

Yes every way you do a problem the answer stays the same, that's hardly the point. 2=2 can be shown on your fingers after all.

The point is to habituate several different approaches to working a problem so when it's time learn Algebra and Calculus the teacher doesn't have to spend a semester or more unteaching folks how they THINK math works

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
9. Yeah the cc math but we took turns teaching them what we knew at home because.....
Sun Dec 9, 2018, 04:43 PM
Dec 2018
https://m.


+ they all write in cursive
Honors teens now and glad we took the extra time in summer when young to educate further but really, wth?
Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Cursive