The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support Forums350-pound man calls police after all-you-can-eat restaurant cuts him off
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/05/16/350-pound-man-calls-police-after-all-you-can-eat-restaurant-cuts-him-off/Standing 6-foot-6 and weighing 350 pounds, Bill Wisth certainly looks like trouble for any buffet restaurant. Chucks Place in Thiensville, Wisconsin recently learned this the hard way, according to Wisconsin news station Todays TMJ4.
After watching Wisth devour 12 individual pieces of fried fish on Friday, May 11, the management decided that was quite enough. They intervened, explaining the restaurant were running out of fish and simply could not allow him to stay any longer.
Giving him eight more pieces as a courtesy, for a total of 20, the restaurants management sent Wisth on his way in hopes that the costly episode was behind them. That hope, however, was severely misplaced.
Jesus, I weigh 300lbs and I can't eat even close to that much! And this guy is a perfect example of "unhealthy fat", I am only 5' 9" and yet a look much thinner than he does!
MiddleFingerMom
(25,163 posts).
.
.
I DO think that a buffet restaurant SHOULD honor its "all-you-can-eat" promotion (the same way
I believe Intertubes providers who offer - and charge for - unlimited data allowances should not be
allowed to "throttle" down heavy bandwidth users.
.
.
I can see a buffet restaurant setting TIME limits (say two hours), but not (sorry) cheese out with
their amended "all-you-can-eat" BS.
.
.
.
.
.
.
You gonna eat that?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Thamppppfff's bulfshipppt.
.
.
.
.
.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)You need to be prepared that someone is gonna take you seriously.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)They told him that's "all you can eat".
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Bad idea.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Initech
(100,065 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Anyone who goes to an "all you can eat" knows that there is a limit to the total amount of food in the place and that there are other customers.
To expect to have 2 or 3 times what others are having is one thing. It could be argued that the business should have planned for such a customer. But to eat 12 times what others eat is unreasonable, selfish, and narcissistic.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)If you want people to be reasonable, don't call it all you can eat. I'm not defending the behavior, or not defending it. I'm only saying, if they want the rules, they should set them. You can't make the speed limit 120 on the freeway and then be surprised when someone doesn't drive 55.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)eat in the establishment, w/o unreasonably eating ALL the food so that other customers don't have any, as long as the establishment prepared a reasonable amount of food.
There is an implicit limit on EVERYTHING. An "all you can eat" salad bar usually has a limit on the number of times you can go back to the salad bar and fil'er'up.
People need to be reasonable and think of others. I guess from now on the signs should have in small print underneath "we reserve the right to limit the number of times a customer can request a meal."
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Who runs these sorts of promotions, you would be mistaken.
Who I am is someone who strives for clarity in language and accuracy in representation. Therefore, if a restaurant feels that "all you can eat" carries an implicit asterisk, then they should include that on the sign.
Or, just dont call it "all you can eat".
Ive had enough jobs dealing with crappy, literal minded members of the public to know that things need to be spelled out Clearly and -this is important- Completely.
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)This has nothing to do with other customers. Its between the patron and the establishment. Taking care of other customers is on the establishment and again, has nothing to do with other customers. If one person eating 20 pieces runs out their supply, so would 20 people each having one piece. Which is possible with the influx of one good size party. If the buffet was understocked, any issues or unhappy people coming in are 100% on their heads.
It also has nothing to do with whether stuffing yourself is a good idea on any level.
If there are limits posted, then fine. Them are the rules. But if its all you can eat, then its all you can eat. Not all a "reasonable person" can eat.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)stuffing your gut.
It means you can fill your plate a couple or three times.
Yes, it has EVERYTHING to do with other customers. That is part of what has gone wrong in this country. No consideration or even acknowledgement of others. It's a business. There will be many customers. The business will have prepared a finite amount of food. One person cannot sit there for hours and eat it ALL. That is NOT what "all you can eat" means.
Maybe restaurants should start cutting people with problems off, like bars too, when a customer has had too much to drink. Maybe restaurants should start refusing to serve people with food addictions more than three servings of fattening foods, because they've had too much to eat and are out of control.
You guys apparently don't frequent "all you can eat' salad bars. There is often a limit to the number of times you can go back to fill 'er up. "All you can eat" means you can pile your plate up once or twice. The end. Period. It does NOT mean you can pile your plate up with ALL the chicken in the salad bar, and keep going back to gobble up all the replenished chicken, leaving none for anyone else.
I guess the man with the food addiction thought "all you can eat" means literally all you can stuff in your gut over an extended period of time. That is not what it means.
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)Its all in what the terms are. If it is an open ended "all you can eat", then it is just that. All you can eat, you being the customer. If there is a posted number of visits or a time limit, whatever, then that's an entirely different picture. But that was not what I saw presented in the article.
As a customer with a business, it my responsibility to make sure that other customers are taken care of? So when I get to Safeway, and they only have 2 boxes of Cheerios left, it is on me to make sure the next customer gets some? Or if I go to get an oil change and they have only 5 quarts of my favored brand left, its my responsibility to make sure that they have it for the next guy who wants it? I buy what I want from a company, if they have it and want to sell it.
I think you are over moralizing this, as well as adding parameters that the article did not specify. If he broke a rule, fine. Boot him. If there's no more fish, fine. That tray sits empty. If they don't want his business, refuse to seat him next time. But unless there are rules limiting the deal offered, when I walk in the door, I expect all you can eat to be all you can eat. And if they run out of something, well, thats what happens with buffets, and then the kitchen subs in some other dish. Ive seen it done virtually every time Ive been in a buffet. Though, you are correct in stating that I don't frequent them.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Management's parting words to him were, "You had enough, fat boy!"
MiddleFingerMom
(25,163 posts)ElboRuum
(4,717 posts)MiddleFingerMom
(25,163 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)This was many years ago in my early 20's when I weighed next to nothing and could eat everything in sight without gaining a pound. Three of my buddies were just like me. A local fish restaurant had an "all you can eat" special every Friday. At first, they had crab legs on the buffet. We would get there early and eat nothing but crab legs until they ran out. The waitresses couldn't keep up with the empty plates and shells. After a few weeks of this, the restaurant took crab legs off the buffet, and a few weeks after that they went out of business. I'm not exactly sure if we actually ate them out of business, but I don't think we helped any and it makes for a good story.
Cal33
(7,018 posts)he'll come to his senses.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)JI7
(89,247 posts)cliffordu
(30,994 posts)One of my best friends is 6'2" and just over 350 and is MUCH smaller than that fish eaten' fool.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)He must be at least 400.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)I mean I'm big and I'm tall and I was 335# at half that size and wearing a 46" waist. Got to a 38", now up to a 42"...so I'm going to go for a walk and see if I can see 36" before November.
MiddleFingerMom
(25,163 posts).
.
.
Seriously!!!
.
.
.
"Honey, do these other diners make me look fat?"
.
.
.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)I'm astounded. I'd never considered the necessity of dining furniture weight-rated to a half-ton before.
Other buffet diners scare me. I'll settle for my salad bar and a water at Ruby Tuesday TYVM.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Salad bars can be worse than a Double Whopper and yet people think it's healthy because it's a salad. People forget that ranch dressing, bacon, and croutons have a lot of calories and feta cheese is high in sodium.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)Out of all of that, the only ones I eat are the feta and croutons.
I'm genetically disposed to chronic low-BP and I'm not giving up the croutons.
I got fat because I used to drink 2 2L bottles of Coke a day and eat Chips-Ahoy and Cool Ranch Doritos for dinner.
struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)Back in the early 1990s, there was an episode of "The Simpsons", where Homer frequented an all-you-can-eat seafood restaurant, The Frying Dutchman. He was banned for eating too much, and he sued them for it. It was the first thing I thought of when I heard this story.
Release The Hounds
(467 posts)(then) "We went fishing".
Rex
(65,616 posts)So what he eat a few planks?
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)whether it's 6 pieces of whatever or 600.
Whether he's fat or unhealthy or whatever you want to call him, the restaurant is in the wrong, imo.They need to post signs or alert patrons of when an item is running out. Even then, I guess he should've been allowed to eat the remainder of the fish in stock. He did pay for it.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Anyone who takes "all you can eat" absolutely literally needs to learn some common sense, because common sense says that "all you can eat" implies a normal appetite.
of course, I bet that this pig knows that, he's just a selfish glutton who doesn't give a damn about everyone else. Gluttony is considered on of the 7 deadly sins for a reason.
MiddleFingerMom
(25,163 posts)Ahem. Biblical "law"? Really? Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!!!!!!!!!!
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)have signs posted with limits on the amount you can eat. Simple.
I totally see your point, and I agree with it, but I really believe it's false advertising by the restaurant and I support this "pig" in this case.
Bruce Wayne
(692 posts)MiddleFingerMom
(25,163 posts).
.
.
.
.
.
.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)JVS
(61,935 posts)Is it ok for Hustler subscribers not to be sent a new issue for a few months because they're lustful?
NickB79
(19,233 posts)derby378
(30,252 posts)This guy is doing it wrong.
Besides, I think these two guys had the best approach to a buffet I've ever seen:
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Bossy Monkey
(15,863 posts)MiddleFingerMom
(25,163 posts).
.
.
... nibbles at a salad and half-a-piece of fish. They also figure in the children that eat free.
.
.
.
Their cost to you, if they've got their shit anywhere NEAR in order, is not going to allow those
with heavy appetites to "run them out of business".
.
Seriously!!! Have you ever people-watched at a decent local buffet restaurant. I get the very
occasional low-esteem teen shouting "Go on a diet, FatMan!!!" from passing cars, but the diners
at buffet restaurants really DO make me feel petite by comparison.
.
If you can't stand the "eat", stay out of the kitchen!!!
.
.
.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)it mean eat all you take, not take all you eat.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)That about sums it up.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)they should have Wisth challenge Joey Chestnut or whoever to a fried fish-eating contest and air it on ESPN2. Memorial Day weekend's coming up!
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Assholes like this guy who intentionally nitpicks things like this are why people are so afraid of being sued in this country.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Is perfectly clear. The only assholes here are the people making offers that they know they have no intention of honoring.
People get sued because they want to distort the meaning of common sense language. If they want to claim that there is a limit, they should express that limit in writing for people to see before coming in. It is a good thing that people get sued when they are making offers with no intention of honoring them.
davsand
(13,421 posts)They could have substituted something like liver and onions or anything else they wanted to. It could very easily have ended up that he left chock full of mashed potatoes, salad, or dessert items that have a lower food cost.
Don't get me wrong--I'd hate to see a customer like that gobble down an entire week's profits in one binge--but they DID advertise all you can eat. A deal is a deal even IF it is costing you more than you bargained for.
Laura
On edit: I just watched the news report on the website, and this guy owes the restaurant for an unpaid tab! Screw him!
Initech
(100,065 posts)WhoIsNumberNone
(7,875 posts)I was going to point out that this was a Simpsons episode- Right down to the all-you-can-eat seafood.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)For who knows how long?
I wouldn't even have let his parasitic ass in the door that night until he paid off the previous tab. AND paid up front for that nights meal.
originalpckelly
(24,382 posts)The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)"That sign clearly said 'all you can eat'. It did not say 'all you can eat today...."
Response to Odin2005 (Original post)
phoenixpp This message was self-deleted by its author.
marygoround9
(1 post)All you can eat means all you can eat! They have to anticipate that some people will stuff themselves until they burst. But it also works in their favor when small people eat there. I go to buffets because I love variety. I love a little of everything. I'm tiny and certainly am never able to eat even close to the amount we pay. They should have just realized that for every huge person overeating, I'm sure they have many more eating much less than they are "entitled to".