Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 2752 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
1938 Dymaxion (Original Post)
demmiblue
May 2019
OP
hunter
(38,309 posts)1. I met Buckminster Fuller as a kid. From my perspective he was really old then.
It was a program for young science prodigies. I wasn't much of a prodigy, I was simply obsessed with computers and had built this horrible and wretchedly naive machine of my own design from old telephone relays. I was also a pyromaniac, so I knew a bit of chemistry as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckminster_Fuller
Uncle Joe
(58,342 posts)6. I love this
(snip)
The words "down" and "up", according to Fuller, are awkward in that they refer to a planar concept of direction inconsistent with human experience. The words "in" and "out" should be used instead, he argued, because they better describe an object's relation to a gravitational center, the Earth. "I suggest to audiences that they say, 'I'm going "outstairs" and "instairs."' At first that sounds strange to them; They all laugh about it. But if they try saying in and out for a few days in fun, they find themselves beginning to realize that they are indeed going inward and outward in respect to the center of Earth, which is our Spaceship Earth. And for the first time they begin to feel real 'reality.'"[85]
(snip)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckminster_Fuller
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)2. Interesting, heard him lecture in hs
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)3. Pretty sure that isn't the real deal although it looks cool
Only three were ever made, and only one survives.
And did you know it was supposed to fly, not drive along the ground?
The Lane Motor Museum didnt spend eight years building an incredibly artful replica of the Dymaxion Car just to make Buckminster Fuller look bad. At least, we dont think they did -- museum director Jeff Lane is too nice of a guy to pick on the famed futurist, especially since Fuller, who died in 1983, isnt around to defend himself.
We wish he were still around today, though, so we could ask him personally what he was thinking when he penned the Dymaxion car. Because we have to report, with some sadness, that its scariest, most poorly designed vehicle weve ever been behind the wheel of.
Of course, blaming Bucky for the cars shortcomings isn't entirely fair, for the Dymaxion car as we know it was far from complete. In its final form, the 20-foot-long podlike contraption would negotiate the skies using some sort of jet-like propulsion system (never mind that jets hadnt quite been invented when the car was developed). Yes, it was supposed to fly.
https://autoweek.com/article/classic-cars/buckminster-fullers-dymaxion-car-probably-scariest-thing-weve-ever-driven
We wish he were still around today, though, so we could ask him personally what he was thinking when he penned the Dymaxion car. Because we have to report, with some sadness, that its scariest, most poorly designed vehicle weve ever been behind the wheel of.
Of course, blaming Bucky for the cars shortcomings isn't entirely fair, for the Dymaxion car as we know it was far from complete. In its final form, the 20-foot-long podlike contraption would negotiate the skies using some sort of jet-like propulsion system (never mind that jets hadnt quite been invented when the car was developed). Yes, it was supposed to fly.
https://autoweek.com/article/classic-cars/buckminster-fullers-dymaxion-car-probably-scariest-thing-weve-ever-driven
demmiblue
(36,838 posts)5. You're right (that is probably why it was in parenthesis).
I did learn some interesting things, though! Thanks for adding that link.
Harker
(14,010 posts)4. Reminds me of the Curtiss Ascender
(Ass-Ender.)
Lady Freedom Returns
(14,120 posts)7. I would love to own this.