Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
1938 Dymaxion (Original Post) demmiblue May 2019 OP
I met Buckminster Fuller as a kid. From my perspective he was really old then. hunter May 2019 #1
I love this Uncle Joe May 2019 #6
Interesting, heard him lecture in hs appalachiablue May 2019 #2
Pretty sure that isn't the real deal although it looks cool ProudLib72 May 2019 #3
You're right (that is probably why it was in parenthesis). demmiblue May 2019 #5
Reminds me of the Curtiss Ascender Harker May 2019 #4
I would love to own this. Lady Freedom Returns May 2019 #7

hunter

(38,309 posts)
1. I met Buckminster Fuller as a kid. From my perspective he was really old then.
Fri May 24, 2019, 04:35 PM
May 2019

It was a program for young science prodigies. I wasn't much of a prodigy, I was simply obsessed with computers and had built this horrible and wretchedly naive machine of my own design from old telephone relays. I was also a pyromaniac, so I knew a bit of chemistry as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckminster_Fuller




Uncle Joe

(58,342 posts)
6. I love this
Sat May 25, 2019, 10:16 AM
May 2019


(snip)

The words "down" and "up", according to Fuller, are awkward in that they refer to a planar concept of direction inconsistent with human experience. The words "in" and "out" should be used instead, he argued, because they better describe an object's relation to a gravitational center, the Earth. "I suggest to audiences that they say, 'I'm going "outstairs" and "instairs."' At first that sounds strange to them; They all laugh about it. But if they try saying in and out for a few days in fun, they find themselves beginning to realize that they are indeed going inward and outward in respect to the center of Earth, which is our Spaceship Earth. And for the first time they begin to feel real 'reality.'"[85]

(snip)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckminster_Fuller



ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
3. Pretty sure that isn't the real deal although it looks cool
Fri May 24, 2019, 06:13 PM
May 2019

Only three were ever made, and only one survives.

And did you know it was supposed to fly, not drive along the ground?

The Lane Motor Museum didn’t spend eight years building an incredibly artful replica of the Dymaxion Car just to make Buckminster Fuller look bad. At least, we don’t think they did -- museum director Jeff Lane is too nice of a guy to pick on the famed futurist, especially since Fuller, who died in 1983, isn’t around to defend himself.

We wish he were still around today, though, so we could ask him personally what he was thinking when he penned the Dymaxion car. Because we have to report, with some sadness, that it’s scariest, most poorly designed vehicle we’ve ever been behind the wheel of.

Of course, blaming Bucky for the car’s shortcomings isn't entirely fair, for the Dymaxion car as we know it was far from complete. In its final form, the 20-foot-long podlike contraption would negotiate the skies using some sort of jet-like propulsion system (never mind that jets hadn’t quite been invented when the car was developed). Yes, it was supposed to fly.
https://autoweek.com/article/classic-cars/buckminster-fullers-dymaxion-car-probably-scariest-thing-weve-ever-driven

demmiblue

(36,838 posts)
5. You're right (that is probably why it was in parenthesis).
Sat May 25, 2019, 09:50 AM
May 2019

I did learn some interesting things, though! Thanks for adding that link.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»1938 Dymaxion