The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsAaaaaaargh!! I hate being a grammar cop!!!!
Last edited Mon May 4, 2020, 08:30 PM - Edit history (1)
My grown children dont speak English. Well, to be honest, they cant write proper English. They dont know to, too, from two, or their from theyre, or, there... or that for all intents and purposes is not for all intensive purposes... etc. etc.
I guess what bugs me the most is that my kids are all college educated... physics teacher, doctor, chef.
Ive given up on then, but my grandkids ... will any of them be able to write English?
Edited to add another a to Aaaaaaargh
Tetrachloride
(7,827 posts)Are split infinitives okay ?
And what about new words like "Expecto Patronum" ?
elleng
(130,860 posts)Grands are 10 months, and 4, 5 + 6 years old. The older ones are learning to read.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)Language changes over time. It's the nature of linguistics.
I once read an article (to lazy to find it and provide a link)... Is that young women/girls drive changes in language... An example is the vocal fry. I know linguistics isn't grammar, but my point is language evolves... quite quickly.
jmbar2
(4,871 posts)...I notice some common grammatical formations among the younger set and wonder where they came from.
For example
I and my friends did
.
Myself and my family did.
.
She had her house broken into. (Why did she do such a thing?)
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)Charlene: I asked this Northern woman, "Where are ya'll from?" And she said, "I'm from a place where we don't end our sentences with prepositions." So I said, "Okay, where are ya'll from, bitch?"
dhol82
(9,352 posts)we're doing good when what is meant we're doing well. this is so common that i expect it will become grammatically correct through usage.
harassment didn't used to be pronounced her ASS ment. i still use Hair is ment, probably because of an article i read sometime back in the 1970s when this new pronunciation became popular. i cannot for the life of me remember the writer but he was a famous columnist and i took his rant to heart and to this day i use the original pronunciation, just as i wince every time someone says, I'm doing good, how are you???
Codeine
(25,586 posts)them, theyll still say me and mom.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)You can suck at math, at science, and history, and it doesnt really affect how youre seen. But, you suck at grammar, and its apparent. People judge you by it.
My grandfather was the wisest man I knew, and I never got him to quit saying it dont... lol
notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)Theyre. There. Their.
Too, two, to
Like that.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)Last edited Sun May 3, 2020, 12:03 AM - Edit history (1)
Still, I like your idea! Ill play the game....
Loose vs lose
Will vs shall
Oxford comma vs not
Splitting an infinitive
Using myself rather than me (aaaagh!)
I vs me...drives me insane!
I could go on. But I realize being so picky is a flaw.
I am a migraine sufferer. We are known for being nit picky over shit that doesnt matter!
Kali
(55,007 posts)but I know I do things that piss off other people so I never say anything.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,336 posts)But, I'm not Just a grammar nazi. I get mad at the TV when referees don't call an obvious traveling or double-dribble violation.
Rules.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)to and too, less folks to judge.
I had a professor mention a brilliant PhD candidate who had never heard the word misled pronounced. He knew what it meant, even used it several times in papers. But, when he read those papers before others, pronounced it mizzeled.
Have heard poor grammar from some people who have great ideas. I am not surprised, however, when a trumpster uses poor grammar.
Hope we are not dumbing down, rather focusing on ideas, feelings, etc.
dhol82
(9,352 posts)They know and accept.
elleng
(130,860 posts)We'll see how it goes with spelling; 2 boys are in kindergarten!
dhol82
(9,352 posts)Sigh.
notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)barbtries
(28,787 posts)but i think spelling involves talent. when i was 14 I edited my older brother's college papers because his spelling was atrocious. he wasn't stupid otherwise.
of course now he's a foxbot so maybe he was stupid and i just didn't want to believe that.
drmeow
(5,017 posts)I have a PhD and I can't spell to save my life! I've forgotten how to spell really basic words. But I'm fully aware that I can't spell so I make sure I look things up before going public with them, so to speak. It was horrible when I was teaching cause I'd write things on the board and if the words were not in my notes I was never sure I'd be able to spell them correctly!
nocoincidences
(2,218 posts)Say the gd t sound!!
Kitten is not kih-un. Button is not buh-un.
I've been hearing this more and more in the way younger people speak. I know American English pronounce that t between vowels differently than British English, we really run past it in a word, but you still know it is there.
Not anymore! It is starting to disappear completely.
Is it bugging anybody else?
I notice it a lot because my last name has the vowel-t-vowel configuration and that t never gets pronounced.
Blues Heron
(5,931 posts)The boatbuilders on acorn to Arabella drop that t every time they say boathouse.
Or "based off of" for based on- that's ubiquitous anymore
Or "anymore" in the affirmative... Heh
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)It's a variant way of pronouncing those words. I first heard it about 65 years ago from a family friend whose native accent was cockney.
I have not noticed that being used where I live, which is in Santa Fe, NM.
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)as in "She really di-ent say that, did she?"
jmbar2
(4,871 posts)I'm hearing a lot of that as well. Heard it from one of the younger NPR newscasters. It seemed so glaring in the middle of NPR's mostly homogenous US English.
One thing I'm noticing less of is "vocal fry", otherwise known as talking like Kardashians. It seems to be mercifully fading from popularity.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)right out of the language. A win for the good guys.
Whenever I heard it, they lost all credibility no matter how educated.
NBachers
(17,098 posts)Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)I hear "budden" and "kidden" a lot in youtube videos. Very ugly!
Codeine
(25,586 posts)with my 15-year-old yesterday afternoon. Stop swallowing letters!! If we lived in an area where that was the regional accent then fine, but California isnt that place.
Jeebo
(2,023 posts)I am retired now, but I am constantly resisting the temptation to correct others' grammar, spelling and usage errors. I rarely do, but sometimes resisting the temptation drives me nuts. This is one of the primary reasons I do not do the Twitter thing, or the Facebook thing, or any of that stuff other than e-mails and, of course, posting on DU. I also hate abbreviations with a purple passion. When I address envelopes, I do not use postal abbreviations but write out the full state name. If any of y'all ever catch me using an abbreviation, please point it out to me in such a manner as to be severely castigating me.
-- Ron
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)vastly prefers the two letter state abbreviations, written in capital letters.
But I'm with you in that it is all that I can do not to correct others' grammar, spelling, and usage errors. Back in the 1970s, my coworkers had learned that I would cheerfully correct their grammar, spelling, and usage errors on anything they put up on the company bulletin board. After a while they'd come to me before posting anything. Yes!
Jack-o-Lantern
(966 posts)tavernier
(12,375 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)I asked her why she didn't correct her kids when they said things like "Me and Laura are going to do this". She rather airily said, "Oh they'll learn the correct usage by example." My sister herself did correctly say things like, "Laura and I are going to do this." But she was totally wrong that her kids would pick up the correct usage.
I was quite fierce with my two about correct usage, including lie and lay. Oddly enough, my two speak correctly as in the example above or with lie and lay. Her kids, not so much.
I have no grandchildren, and probably never will, alas. But if I did, you'd be sure that if I ever spent more than five minutes with them I'd be correcting their grammar and usage.
Also, it is glaringly obvious that the schools simply don't teach these things any more.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)I do well with spelling and clearly know the difference between their and there. I know the differences of two, to, and too. I know how to form sentences properly. I even know how to organize paragraphs in order to get a point across properly.
I grew up with a mother who is an English major if that explains anything.
I would rather be corrected by grammar cop and be embarrassed for a moment than continue to look stupid from constant mistakes.
I am a bit learning challenged when it comes to reading, writing, and arithmetic so remembering some of those things is challenging but I sure work at it.
I am glad I never had children because as far as getting help from their mother with homework they would have been screwed.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)We grammar cops know we are not liked or appreciated for the most part.
I can also tell you that the grammar correction thing in Word is sometimes wrong. So my advice is to ignore that, and if you're unsure about some usage, if you can check with someone else you trust, please do so.
Perhaps we need a "Ask the Grammar Nazi" help desk somewhere.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)One thing that I am very good at is pronunciation. I do very well at proper pronunciation for not only English but also words in other languages.
My friends just hate it because when they pronounce something wrong I make this under my breath but pretty audible correction.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)I'm pretty good at pronouncing most words, but there are some, mainly because I've never heard them spoken aloud but only seen them written, that I'm puzzled by.
Some years back I finally learned the correct pronunciation of "emeritus" because I mis-pronounced it in front of someone who knew better. I was embarrassed at the time, but very grateful I was corrected.
Here's a word I see reasonably often but am totally befuddled by: inchoate.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)Hmm, I will have to look that word up.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)as "anna-moan." Nobody ever had the heart to correct her.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)but I do understand the mispronunciation. It really has to do with whether or not we've heard a particular word pronounced.
NBachers
(17,098 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)by posting a query to you as my grammar resource, in another thread.
Misplaced modifiers are what drive me nutso!
https://upload.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1018&pid=1355362
wryter2000
(46,032 posts)Him and me did something.
I've had other writers tell me that's how people speak these days. No, no, just no.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)for such usages.
wryter2000
(46,032 posts)ProfessorGAC
(64,988 posts)Well, maybe to weasel into the spot in the first place! Just wondering.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)And now I get to do it to other people and annoy the shit out of them.
keithbvadu2
(36,745 posts)It goes back a long time. Chaucer wasn't gud with it either.
dweller
(23,625 posts)doesn't this make you the gramma grammar cop ?
🤔
✌🏼
tavernier
(12,375 posts)because I screw up with grammar too much myself. Its just the obvious mistakes, the glaring ones, that make me crazy. So basically Im gramma hypocrite.
For instance, I pronounce clothes, cloze. Always have and probably always will. My tongue just cant do the TH thing in that particular word. LOL.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)It means 'any longer', not 'nowadays'.
Correct:
We don't go to the beach anymore, we go to the mountains.
Incorrect:
Anymore we go to the mountains instead of the beach.
People use it like that ALL the time anymore
NBachers
(17,098 posts)royable
(1,264 posts)You never "have" to use it.
If you want a possessive pronoun, the word is "its."
If you want a contraction, you don't "have" to use a contraction; you can instead use the two words "it is" from which the contraction is formed. Knowing that, you can then make the contraction "it's" if you so choose. But it is a choice. (See what I did there?)
[I've put "have" in quotes above because of course there are times you have to use the word "it's," such as if there is a need for informality, or you're quoting someone's speech, or if you're writing verbatim what someone wrote who made the mistake of putting the apostrophe into the possessive pronoun.]
The second best way I've ever come across to remember how to handle the "its" apostrophe:
The possessive pronouns are my, our, your, his, her, its, and their. There's also an independent form of each of these pronouns: mine, ours, yours, his, hers, its, and theirs. Think of the singular first person possessive pronouns: my and mine. They don't end in an apostrophe s. So, neither should the rest of the possessive pronouns.
Use this knowledge at your own risk.
malaise
(268,885 posts)I was really shocked to see the online material using I will and we will. Traditional English uses I shall and we shall for first person(s) singular or plural.
I also see other errors in the prescribed teaching material.
DFW
(54,330 posts)It's not limited to America, by the way. My wife, a social worker here in Germany, goes crazy when adult educated Germans make grammatical mistakes that would flunk them out of school if they had to start again.
Have you shown your children the "Excerpts From The Official Dictionary of Republicanese?" (If they are Republicans, then don't, because they will say, "where's the problem?" ). But I see it all the time in written correspondence from the USA.
The worst is using an apostrophe to form a plural. There is NOT ONE elementary school in the English-speaking world--from England to Ireland to former British colonies in Africa to former British colonies in Asia to Australia to New Zealand to Canada to the USA to Belize--NOT ONE that teaches kids to use an apostrophe to form a plural. And yet millions of Americans do just that. Not just Russian bots, but real, live supposedly-educated Americans. Where they picked this up, I have no clue. Outside of the "Excerpts From The Official Dictionary of Republicanese," no such grammatical rule is promoted or even suggested.
hlthe2b
(102,200 posts)I do find my own spelling being affected given I have always been a visual speller (as opposed to a phonetic speller) and I see so many gross errors in recent years. Seeing those errors online and in print makes me less sure and I have to often check that which I was always certain of in the past.
And don't get me started on the fact that even Master's Degree candidates very frequently cannot write, spell, form a grammatically correct sentence. It has made it impossible for me to serve as their thesis advisor, as I once did in the past because I can't rewrite it for them--but neither can I responsibly "sign-off." Many insist on putting it forward anyway and I guess some committees just turn a blind eye.
I am certainly much more relaxed about this in informal correspondence, internet forum replies, email, and texts, but I do think it makes a difference in more formal writing. Even blogs.
Paladin
(28,246 posts)People who aren't adept at the proper usage of things such as to/too/two and there/they're/their are handicapped for life, looked down upon by the majority of the population that has mastered the utter basics of their native language. Best of luck to you.
Tracer
(2,769 posts)Once she asked me what a "windshield factor" was (as heard from a TV weatherman).
She also thought the outside water faucet was a "spicket."
On DU, posters are constantly spelling simple words incorrectly. Why write "loose" for "lose"? Maybe it's the long "o" that fools them.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Iggo
(47,547 posts)LAS14
(13,781 posts)... is using the wrong form of their, to, etc. And I've been a grammar police with my kids. One time my son, a teacher in public schools, put a poster up in the hall where he used the wrong form of there. Arrrrgghhh!!!!!
LAS14
(13,781 posts)incorrectly. It's nuts!!!
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)LeftInTX
(25,220 posts)What's wrong honey?
Wife: These contractions are killing me!
Man: What is wrong honey?
***********************************************************************
I'm horrible with grammar BTW, but feel free to correct me!
Iggo
(47,547 posts)Wolf Frankula
(3,600 posts)Don't practice grammarie.
Soo schel your hous stonde and bee
Unto eternytee
Yet walke warilie
Wyttinge ful sarteynlee
That if impiouslie
The secounde tyme in the bodie
Practisinge grammarie
One of ye katched shulle be
By the feyndis subtiltee
And hys liffe lossit bee
Broke ys thenne this serye
Dampned are you thenne eternallie
Yerth shuldestow thenne never more se
Scarsly the Goddes mought reskue ye
Owt of the Helle where you woll lie
Unto eternytee
The sterres tealde hit mee.
Wolf
Codeine
(25,586 posts)That seems to be the dividing line; no matter how intelligent a person is they just dont pick that sort of thing up unless their brains are continually exposed to properly-executed grammar and sentence structure when young.
tavernier
(12,375 posts)at a university. She is a bookworm and is presently intent on reading the list of 100 most read books of all time. She has been a reader since she could open book. She writes beautifully as well, interesting and amusing stories. But if the sentence requires a to or a there, those are always her choices. Her sister, on the other hand, is a self taught chef, no college, once-in-a-while reader, but much more aware of proper grammar in her writing. My son is a science and physics teacher, never reads, and it shows in his writing... complete disaster.
Go figure why these little heathens turned out this way.
But of course, otherwise, they are the greatest kids on earth!!
Codeine
(25,586 posts)its safe to say Id be inclined to grant them some creative wiggle room as well.
lame54
(35,281 posts)Not be confused with Aaaaaackkk,which only has six.
Fixed.