![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Corgigal | Feb 25 | OP |
Hugh_Lebowski | Feb 25 | #1 | |
Corgigal | Feb 25 | #2 | |
Hugh_Lebowski | Feb 25 | #4 | |
TrogL | Feb 25 | #3 | |
Hugh_Lebowski | Feb 25 | #5 | |
Corgigal | Feb 25 | #6 | |
True Dough | Feb 25 | #7 | |
Corgigal | Feb 25 | #8 | |
rurallib | Feb 25 | #9 | |
Corgigal | Feb 25 | #10 | |
Iggo | Feb 25 | #11 |
Response to Corgigal (Original post)
Thu Feb 25, 2021, 02:06 AM
Hugh_Lebowski (20,789 posts)
1. I heartily second that nomination. This is a freaking AWESOME cover!
My gosh, with that voice, along with her eyes, smile, and flawless skin, with what looks like little or no makeup ...
I'd say if she can write music at all, she's got serious 'Star' potential. And hey, I checked and she's 20, so I'm allowed to say she's beautiful ![]() |
Response to Hugh_Lebowski (Reply #1)
Thu Feb 25, 2021, 02:23 AM
Corgigal (8,246 posts)
2. Yeah, amazing right?
I asked my daughter, who knows more about the musical equipment she is using, is that little gal really singing that? Is there something in her microphone digitally assist her. My daughter didn’t think so, believes it’s really her. I’m sure we should see her around soon then.
|
Response to Corgigal (Reply #2)
Thu Feb 25, 2021, 03:05 AM
Hugh_Lebowski (20,789 posts)
4. It's not a completely dry vocal recording (not totally without effects) but I don't think there's
any significant digital 'correction' (auto-tune type of things) going on.
|
Response to Corgigal (Original post)
Thu Feb 25, 2021, 03:04 AM
TrogL (32,453 posts)
3. I call fake
I’m a recording tech.
You have to stay absolutely motionless in front of the microphone or it’s going to cause all sorts of problems with changing levels and phase shifts. The way she’s bouncing around the recording would be useless. |
Response to TrogL (Reply #3)
Thu Feb 25, 2021, 03:08 AM
Hugh_Lebowski (20,789 posts)
5. I'd say it's an multi-directional condenser mic, with some compression in the chain, myself.
I.E. I don't think it's 'fake'.
It's not totally dry of course but she's singing that, I'm 99% sure. And I think the 'assistance' is fairly minimal. |
Response to TrogL (Reply #3)
Thu Feb 25, 2021, 03:08 AM
Corgigal (8,246 posts)
6. Thanks.
I really don’t know. However, if true I’m sure someone will scoop her up. If fake, or digitally enhanced then YouTube it is. This little lady already has 13 million views for a short time being up.
Thanks for your input, it does make sense. |
Response to Corgigal (Reply #6)
Thu Feb 25, 2021, 07:29 AM
True Dough (11,975 posts)
7. I've accounted for several dozen of those YouTube views over the past few months
I have no idea whether there's any technological enhancements to her performance. Listening to it brings me pure joy regardless!
|
Response to True Dough (Reply #7)
Thu Feb 25, 2021, 12:16 PM
Corgigal (8,246 posts)
8. Would be nice,
to have a Stevie voice back, kind of. Just a wish.
|
Response to Corgigal (Original post)
Thu Feb 25, 2021, 10:17 PM
rurallib (56,465 posts)
9. So let's see her do something else and judge
|
Response to rurallib (Reply #9)
Thu Feb 25, 2021, 10:45 PM
Corgigal (8,246 posts)
10. Read on YouTube
That the Jonah Brothers just signed her. Is it true? I don’t know, but if she sounds this good really, we will hear from her again. If she goes into the business, hope she stays healthy.
|
Response to Corgigal (Original post)
Thu Feb 25, 2021, 11:45 PM
Iggo (44,178 posts)
11. Aw! She's adorable!
Helluva voice, too, lip-sync or not.
|