The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsDeep Impact vs Armageddon
1 vote, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Deep Impact | |
1 (100%) |
|
Armageddon | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
hunter
(38,264 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,781 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,827 posts)But, I think Deep Impact was better overall.
olddots
(10,237 posts)Sharknado was almost as bad as Armageddon and it cost about 1/1000th. as much to make .
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)I mean, what can beat Bruce Willis chasing Ben Affleck around an oil rig with a shotgun?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)petronius
(26,580 posts)Deep Impact is such a dopey-sounding, self-consciously-clever, Steven-Seagal-like title. And even though Seagal had nothing to do with Deep Impact as far as I know, it sounds like a title he would choose, and that's enough. However, it turns out that Seagal actually was in a movie slash beer commercial called Sheep Impact, which creates a quandary: can I truly reject Deep Impact for sounding Seagalish in title when Seagal himself participated in sort of spoofing it?
But, it turned out that Sheep Impact wasn't quite as funny as I hoped, not enough to redeem the name-lameness of Deep Impact. Therefore, I vote for Armageddon (and I trust my unassailable reasoning will now put this thread to bed)...