The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsDoes anyone else hate it when a performer injects hi/her political beliefs
during a live performance ?I don't care if it's right wing..left wing..or in the middle, I pay good
money to be ENTERTAINED....not lectured.
I was at a show last week when a performer did just that. You could feel the audience's
excitement level go WAY down. Why do they do that? To me...it's like espousing your personal religious views during a show.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)Dance monkey dance?
No, I have no problem with it at all.
I also do not have a problem with espousing religious views. I do not think that performers are jukeboxes. I think they are real live human beings who sometimes want to share their beliefs with their fans. WTF is wrong with that?
clarice
(5,504 posts)CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)Why do you hate the constitution?
clarice
(5,504 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Nor is the majority of the show "that stuff"...
clarice
(5,504 posts)Aristus
(66,280 posts)Left-wing or right-wing.
Performers' lives are such open books these days, we will know their views without having to be told.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)If the lyrics are politically motivated and people are there because they like it, not a problem.
I want to be entertained, but I tend to like music for other reasons too. The worst show I ever went to was Paramore. The singer kept telling long-winded stories about herself between each song. She was a self-absorbed idiot and it really detracted from the performance.
If you go to see Rage against the Machine...you pretty well know what to expect, and you are probably there because you agree with the band's leanings. But I hate to be blindsided with it.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)So is being too drunk to get through the songs and babbling nonsensically!! (I've been to shows like that too).
Do you mind if I ask which performer blindsided you?
clarice
(5,504 posts)at a Steve Miller concert years ago...when the drummer fell off of his stool (drunk as hell)
The rest of the band just laughed.
re" The recent show ?...I would rather not say...I'm already collecting heat on this post.
Let's just say that it was someone who most people would consider "main stream"
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Main stream performers really SHOULDN'T open their mouths! They present a public image constructed to garner them a great deal of popularity, personal politics doesn't mix.
IcyPeas
(21,839 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Maybe it's in the same way Reagan liked Born in the USA and Paul Ryan doesn't actually listen to the words that reject everything he stands for.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)Beaverhausen
(24,469 posts)if this performer was saying hateful or racist things, that might be different. But If he or she was just stating his/her opinion about something, why does it bother you?
And why not just say who it was and/or what was said?
clarice
(5,504 posts)opinions on anything more than music. I guess I'm just funny that way.
re: who was the performer? I would rather not say, but it was someone who
most people would consider "main stream"
question: Why does it bother you that it bothers me?
Beaverhausen
(24,469 posts)Entertainers are people. They can do or say what they like. Why do you want to stifle them? Yes, I know you didn't attend the show to hear them speak.
As someone said above, Shut Up and Sing, right? That's not cool.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)if someone else injects their beliefs during live performances, but if it were me, I wouldn't volunteer my political beliefs like that particularly somewhere that doesn't call for it. Obviously not everyone in the world has the same beliefs, so you're going to risk pissing off some of your fans. From a business standpoint, it wouldn't be the smartest thing to do.
clarice
(5,504 posts)lululu
(301 posts)If I don't like what they say, I don't have to buy any more tickets. Too many people don't give a d*mn, we need more who do.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Neoma
(10,039 posts)I thought you meant stand up comedians and I was like, "you don't know the history of stand up comedy do you?"
Music? Depends on the type of band, but typically a different story.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)If someone's political views drastically contrasted w. my own I probably wouldn't be in the audience in the first place.
I find it more troublesome when there are indirect appeals to "patriotism" to not-so-subtly support militarism and , in effect, US foreign policy.
Usually, you're a captive audience... there to see a friggin' baseball game or whatever. Some kind of politically *neutral* event.
As in: " Now: to honor our men and women in the armed forces.....": Bullshit. They're not trying to "honor" anyone. They're trying to promote flag-worship and support for US foreign policy.
clarice
(5,504 posts)What DOES bother me is when a performer (especially a non- American) starts raving
against the system that allowed them to become rich and famous. Hello Roger Waters?
Oh my, I'm really asking for it now.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts).... know that he a political-type guy?
I don't follow him that closely but isn't his activism pretty international in scope?
What exactly is the objection? He's British... isn't he?
Wouldn't it have been the *British* system that allowed him to become rich and famous?
clarice
(5,504 posts)Roger assumed the dominate song writer roll and started injecting anti capitalist
sentiment into the Floyd mix. This (in part) helped to break up the band as the other members
sensed that Waters was being hypocritical by collecting millions of dollars from an economic
system he seemed to deplore. My objection is the obvious hypocrisy of his stance. Both Britain and the
U.S. operate under capitalist systems so yes........he made lot's of money in both Countries as well
as world wide.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Should Roosevelt NOT have stepped into the Great Depression to reel in the unfettered capitalism that produced his own family's wealth?
Gosh. That was so *hypocritical*.
I know little about Waters and even less about his economic critique but does it logically follow that: 1. since Citizen A did very well under a particular economic arrangement that , 2. Citizen A cannot/should not advance a critique or pov based, for example, on his observations of OTHER PEOPLE'S EXPERIENCE under the same economic arrangement?
Bad logic and muddy waters. Pun intended.
clarice
(5,504 posts)If citizen A. flourished under a particular economic system, wouldn't it behoove him/her to advocate that
system so that others might flourish? It seems to me that he has 1%er syndrome.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Maybe he IS an anomaly.
clarice
(5,504 posts)noamnety
(20,234 posts)1% syndrome is believing that everyone can be in the 1%, just because they made it as an individual.
It's far more realistic and empathetic to understand that they were a statistical fluke, and we need a system that provides a safety net for everyone, instead of just for the lucky 1 percenters.
As for speaking out, if you feel strongly about an issue and have been given a microphone, there might be a sense of moral imperative to use that situation to try to change the world for the better, instead of shutting your mouth and mindlessly entertaining people for a buck.
And for those of us in the audience, that might mean we feel a moral imperative to support or boycott that artist, depending on their views.
clarice
(5,504 posts)noamnety
(20,234 posts)Do you think all rich people should believe that everyone can be middle class or above under capitalism?
clarice
(5,504 posts)IMO....anyone who makes a fortune under the capitalist system, and then rails against
corporate America/capitalism in the media is being disingenuous at best. Don't get me wrong, everyone is entitled to their own belief systems... but it's unseemly to constantly bite the hand that feeds you.
I think most level headed people feel the same way.
I appreciate the chance to converse with you.
Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)All I'm saying is that 14 million dollars ain't too bad for a self-proclaimed socialist.
Now, please don't get me wrong...she's got a great voice..one of the clearest..
but it has been my life's goal to root out hypocrisy where ever I see it.
Kingofalldems
(38,420 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)She wouldn't have a $14 million dollar bank roll. She would have shared it with the masses.
14 million puts her in the 1%er category.
Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)Thou seest the mote in thy neighbor's eye...
Focus on doing something yourself, instead of acting as humanity's unappointed judge.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)Trashing every entertainer for the sin of making money and having political beliefs would leave pretty much no one to like worth a damn. Wonder how she feels about the Boss.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Just one person exercising my right to question the veracity of certain issues. I have never been one to swallow ANY party line or to march lock step with popular opinion. I hope this explains things.
I have enjoyed the chance to talk with you. Peace.
NNadir
(33,457 posts)This is the guy who carries on about his environmentalism, while breeding a huge brood of consumers just like himself.
He writes a catchy tune, but it's annoying to watch him make an ass of himself when he opens his mouth.
clarice
(5,504 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,420 posts)Guess you forgot.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,420 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)noamnety
(20,234 posts)They made their comments in 2003, and had a #1 album on the Billboard country charts 3 years later, and 5 grammy awards in 2007.
You may lead a much more charmed life than me, but if I had a number one album anywhere and a grammy, I wouldn't think of my career as ruined. I'd be freaking jumping up and down. If you don't mind my asking, what the heck do you do that makes you view that as a failure?
clarice
(5,504 posts)decisions to make this possible. I didn't want to get into an argument over the Dixie Chicks. I have no
feeling either way about them. However, I did watch the program "shut up and sing" just to see what all of the fuss was about. If you have watched it, then you get my point about the public turning their backs.
Beaverhausen
(24,469 posts)They went more Americana on the next CD, hiring Rick Rubin to produce and had a hit, Grammy-winning record.
Now, Emily and Marti have done 2 CD as Courtyard Hounds and Natalie put out a solo CD. I think they will be working together again soon.
You *really* have a problem with entertainers who have an opinion. It's very clear with your responses on this thread.
clarice
(5,504 posts)I simply stated that I don't pay good money to hear an entertainers political beliefs. Unless
I know going in, that it will be more of a political rally rather than a music show. That goes for right wing, left wing, or in the middle. What I find fascinating, is that you have let one person's opinion rile you so.
Calm down, I'm not here to fight with anyone (unless provoked)
Kingofalldems
(38,420 posts)Good try though.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,420 posts)The fact is they were blackballed by the media e.g. country music stations.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,420 posts)Acting like a Repug eh? How ironic.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,420 posts)Kali
(55,002 posts)otherwise it is fine
clarice
(5,504 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)If I am paying to be entertained, then that is what I have spent my money upon. If I want a political discussion, then I will find the forum for that as well.
LisaLynne
(14,554 posts)I guess I have no opinion!
dr.strangelove
(4,851 posts)its only because I disagree, not with them saying their position. Of course if its during a song or something, I might be annoyed. But if they just talk about their beliefs, its fine with me.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)I was at a funeral service for an elderly relative about two weeks ago. The service was held at the funeral home, not in a church. There was a preacher who presided. The immediate family of the deceased spoke about her, their memories, etc., and there was very little involvement by the preacher UNTIL he started ranting about how he was so sad that his children were not going to be able to "live in the America where he grew up".
It was completely and totally unnecessary for him to say this.
You could feel the chill and the stares...
bluesbassman
(19,358 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)I don't happen to be a fan of any, anyway, so it's not a problem. I grew up listening to country music and I tend to loathe most of it (some of the old stuff, like Johnny Cash, is good though).
During the early days of the Iraq invasion/slaughter there was nary a voice to be heard speaking out against the war, except for entertainers like Green Day. I appreciate them having the guts to put themselves out there amidst the rabid jingoism.
I don't like giving my money to performers with whom I disagree on fundamental issues.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Just being honest here.
Thankfully, most performers I like share my views
I big exception is many on the SNL cast from the early 90's. I'm surprised that many of them turned to be rabid right wingers, and I wonder why it happened...seems like an anomaly
Victoria Jackson, Dana Carvey, Adam Sandler (liked all of them) Denis Miller (always despised him)...I think it's weird