Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gvstn

(2,805 posts)
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 10:43 PM Aug 2014

New Radio format: Your Favorite Songs, Abridged

Just heard this on NPR this afternoon, a radio station in Canada has decided to edit songs down to a two minute format because kids get bored with a three and a half minute song. I am officially too old to go on much longer.

Last Friday, a Top 40 radio station in Calgary, Alberta, introduced listeners to a new format. As one on-air stinger put it, "90.3 AMP: Now twice the music."

When they say "twice the music," though, they actually mean half the song. That is, this station plays songs that have been heavily edited: long opening riffs, instrumental breaks, even a chorus or two might disappear. The goal, the station's representatives say, is to keep listeners from getting bored.
http://www.wnyc.org/story/your-favorite-songs-abridged/

Station if you want to listen: http://streema.com/radios/Amp_Radio_Calgary_CFUL (I don't know enough top forty to know the difference)
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Radio format: Your Favorite Songs, Abridged (Original Post) gvstn Aug 2014 OP
Great..now listeners can hear the same modern crap tunes 60 times a day instead of 30. BlueJazz Aug 2014 #1
Right, it's not as though they will play more songs csziggy Aug 2014 #6
I think it sucks csziggy Aug 2014 #2
I first heard this on the radio... Throd Aug 2014 #4
It's the Reader's Digest of radio stations. Ron Obvious Aug 2014 #3
I am Joe's brain... pinboy3niner Aug 2014 #5
I thought it was a good segment. gvstn Aug 2014 #7
I heard that same segment Orrex Aug 2014 #9
The Residents already did this over 30 years ago cemaphonic Aug 2014 #8
Well, I can see why Top 40 could get boring. MH1 Aug 2014 #10
Top 40 is bad because there are no distinctive voices. gvstn Aug 2014 #11

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
6. Right, it's not as though they will play more songs
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 11:45 PM
Aug 2014

They will just play the same ones over and over, now more often.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
2. I think it sucks
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 10:54 PM
Aug 2014

I like the long version of songs. But then I'm old.

I once complained to a radio station that claimed they were playing the "full" Ina-gadda-da-vida. When they made the announcement before the song began, I was stoked - I had about a twenty minute drive home and was all set to listen to the music all the way. They played the abridged 5 minute version. The COMPLETE song is 17 minutes!

The DJ was great - he asked me to call the next night when I headed home and he did play the full version. It was great.



I pity kids that don't have the attention span to listen to a masterpiece like that. They are missing so much.
 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
3. It's the Reader's Digest of radio stations.
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 11:18 PM
Aug 2014

I hate Reader's Digest.

I heard the same NPR story you did, and my reaction was much the same as yours.

gvstn

(2,805 posts)
7. I thought it was a good segment.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 12:43 AM
Aug 2014

Only 5 minutes or so for those with short attention spans and available at the NPR link I originally posted.
I really think the interview is worth a listen.

The interviewer did cover all the bases about artists being upset that something might be lost in editing etc. but the guy from the radio station just seemed to have no clue about music in general. All he could say is that 3½ minutes was arbitrary, not that musicians actually worked within those parameters to make a song work and include everything they could to make us feel good. I know that even these days, where I can count the number of actual books I read in a year on one hand, I still love hearing a particular song on the radio and 3½ minutes of it is just too short.

His bit about kids starting a song on an Ipod and then moving to the next one 90 seconds later just sounds dumb. I've done that forever even on LPs when I thought a particular song was what I wanted to hear and then decided, "No that is not it", I want something else. I never wanted an abbreviated version of a song that made me feel good!

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
9. I heard that same segment
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 11:05 AM
Aug 2014

I liked the bit where they featured NPR's own "abridged" music sampler, effectively showing how preposterous this is.

Of course, I suppose this means that we'll start seeing syndicated TV shows edited down to digestible 5-minute chunks...

cemaphonic

(4,138 posts)
8. The Residents already did this over 30 years ago
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 05:08 AM
Aug 2014

The Commercial Album is an album of 40 songs, each exactly one minute long. Since it's The Residents, they sound like this:

MH1

(17,600 posts)
10. Well, I can see why Top 40 could get boring.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 01:05 PM
Aug 2014

Almost every popular new song I've heard sucks really really bad to my older ears, and actually listening to a full 3-4 minutes of that suckage would be unbearable. I've gotten very good at tuning out the suckage when I have to be in a place where it is playing.

gvstn

(2,805 posts)
11. Top 40 is bad because there are no distinctive voices.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 02:25 PM
Aug 2014

Everyone's voice sounds the same. I really think musical "artists" are now picked by how they can be packaged and how much non-musical merchandise can be sold. I can't remember the last time I turned on the radio and heard a song and thought, "Cool, so and so has a new song". No one's voice stands out like that to me anymore.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»New Radio format: Your Fa...