Grace Kelly beats Audrey Hepburn?

[malthaussen]

I won't disfigure the lounge with a link, but I saw a survey recently which rated Grace Kelly as more beautiful than Audrey Hepburn.

What universe could that be in? There is no comparison! I guess it proves that blondes do have an edge after all.

-- Mal

[PennyK]

1. No!

Even though I admit Grace Kelly had a more classical beauty, Audrey Hepburn was unique and charming and glorious!

[Paulie]

2. Don't visit that place where the link goes

It's a bad bad bad place disconnected from reality.

[CaliforniaPeggy]

3. My dear malthaussen!

I would say they were both beautiful, in their own unique ways. NOT comparable at all...

Grace Kelly was glamorous, a classic sleek beauty, while Audrey Hepburn was more pixie-ish...I can't really think of any words to describe how she differs from Grace Kelly.

But they sure as hell were both beautiful.

[bigwillq]

4. I would agree

Kelly>Hepburn but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. No issues with those who think Hepburn is.

[malthaussen]

5. I'll take Audrey for the eyes and smile. n/t

[mackerel]

6. They were both quite beautiful, Audrey had the opportunity to do

humanitarian works which always adds to beauty.

[IrishEyes]

7. They were both beautiful both inside and out.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. They are both beautiful but they had different looks. Both of them are usually on the lists of most beautiful women and lists of style icons.

[hifiguy]

8. Not. A. Chance. In. Hell.

And Audrey was a considerably better actress, to boot.





Now if it was Hepburn v. Sophia Loren, I would find myself in the position of the mule who starved to death, unable to decide which of two equidistant bales of hay looked the most appetizing.

[BlueJazz]

9. .

[betsuni]

10. But didn't Hepburn have kind of a Funny Face?