The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsSo far, which juror do you like best? #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, or #6?
I haven't been able to make up my mind of this, which is why I'm setting the problem before the savants of teh Lounge
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and 3 makes me laugh most often
dimbear
(6,271 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Apparently, opining that the world would be better off without the likes of George Zimmerman or Thomas Kinkade (who literally swindled old people) is just beyond the pale, BEYOND I tell ya!
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: It's ugly and I agree with the person who alerted. This is just so unnecessary.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: Hide the post and BAN THE POSTER. Let me emphasize that: Delete the post and block the user. Openly wishing harm on someone is not only against our community standards here, it's just plain wrong.
The attitudes within the post are typical of the low standard to which too many people here on DU seem to hold themselves. For them, it's cool to hate openly Christian people and/or anyone whose work they question. It's fine to criticize Thomas Kinkade as an artist. It's another to dance on his grave.
As for George Zimmerman, the law ought to take its course. I think we all wish for justice for poor Trayvon Martin.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: If I have to explain my reason, there might be something wrong with you.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
"BAN THE POSTER"!!!11!!
``
``
Tobin S.
(10,418 posts)5 sounds like my mom.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)"Have you been smoking something?"
provis99
(13,062 posts)might as well have just turned it into an OP!
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Major Nikon
(36,814 posts)I've also heard that juror #3 is secretly working for the FBI.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Mar 29, 2012, 07:41 PM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Hardly offensive. I doubt the poster in question was referring to progressive values in this case.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I heard a rumor that juror #6's vote can be bought.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: The post was a senseless personal attack. It had no context other than personal attack.
Though I could see #3 in the FBI as plausible, I mean how would he/she know?
Major Nikon
(36,814 posts)And I can prove it.
The Magistrate
(95,237 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)I am a free man!!!...
The Magistrate
(95,237 posts)Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)unionworks
(3,574 posts)...is the loneliest juror...
Major Nikon
(36,814 posts)JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Apr 8, 2012, 12:28 AM, and the Jury voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said:
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given