Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
Sun Mar 12, 2017, 01:28 PM Mar 2017

The Rolling Stone top 100 Guitarists List

Link to the list

Eliot Rosewater posted for DUers to note the greatest guitarists. I thought I'd have some fun with that. Two years ago, Rolling Stone assembled a panel of alleged experts and compiled a list of the 100 greatest guitarists. They didn't say "of the Rock era" but it's clearly implied.

My theory is that these lists are designed to cause arguments -- otherwise, who'd talk about them? My mission to those willing to participate:

- Identify the glaring omissions
- Identify those who belong on the list, but are way too high or too low
- Identify those who don't belong on the list


IMHO

Glaring omission: Lowell George of Little Feat (there are many, many others)
Too high/low: Alex Lifeson is down near the bottom of the top 100 - I'd put him closer to the middle
Doesn't belong: John Lennon is a gifted songwriter and the Beatles were a great group - but he has no business in the top 100.
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Rolling Stone top 100 Guitarists List (Original Post) Algernon Moncrieff Mar 2017 OP
Identify the glaring omissions ...... stonecutter357 Mar 2017 #1
Yep - agree glaringly omitted Algernon Moncrieff Mar 2017 #6
Whoa! What the fuck! Iggo Mar 2017 #9
That whole genre is hard to fit into lists like this cemaphonic Mar 2017 #14
But couldn't the same be said about some that appeared on the list, like McLaughlin and Fripp? Algernon Moncrieff Mar 2017 #23
Possibly - ultimately, that list is the subjective opinion of a bunch of professional guitarists. cemaphonic Mar 2017 #30
Identify the glaring omissions ...... stonecutter357 Mar 2017 #2
Also agree - glaringly omitted Algernon Moncrieff Mar 2017 #7
Glad they included John McLaughlin CountAllVotes Mar 2017 #3
I guess I keep wondering where they drew the line with regard to McLaughlin Algernon Moncrieff Mar 2017 #8
Al DiMeola convinced me to use tiny pointy picks. (n/t) Iggo Mar 2017 #10
I didn't make the list.... louis-t Mar 2017 #4
Next year! Algernon Moncrieff Mar 2017 #5
If their idea of who belongs in the R&RHOF is any indication, this list should be hilariously wrong. Iggo Mar 2017 #11
Yes - pretty much it's that Algernon Moncrieff Mar 2017 #22
Identify the glaring omissions yuiyoshida Mar 2017 #12
Probably because the voting panel are mostly American and British musicians cemaphonic Mar 2017 #13
and let me guess... yuiyoshida Mar 2017 #15
+1000 stonecutter357 Mar 2017 #16
There are women on both the voting panel and the list. cemaphonic Mar 2017 #17
So WHY IS THAT? yuiyoshida Mar 2017 #18
Well, "these days" is part of the answer cemaphonic Mar 2017 #19
Rie a.k.a. Suzaku is one of my friends on twitter these days yuiyoshida Mar 2017 #20
My favorite foreign cover..... WiffenPoof Mar 2017 #27
link goes no where... yuiyoshida Mar 2017 #29
Any list of the so-called "best 100 guitarists" without Ernie Isley on it is a bullshit list. MrScorpio Mar 2017 #21
I would also note that George Benson seems to be missing from the list Algernon Moncrieff Mar 2017 #24
That is another crime. MrScorpio Mar 2017 #25
Thurston Moore, Kurt Cobain, and Peter Buck Charles Bukowski Mar 2017 #26
I think all three are defendable in terms of influence cemaphonic Mar 2017 #31
Joke list, Rory Gallagher only at no 57 OnDoutside Mar 2017 #28
OMISSION: STEVE LUKATHER 7wo7rees Mar 2017 #32

cemaphonic

(4,138 posts)
14. That whole genre is hard to fit into lists like this
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 07:21 PM
Mar 2017

Malmsteen, Vai, Satriani, Buckethead, and some of the more modern guys like Paul Gilbert are obviously technical wizards. But they also make music that pretty much appeals only to other guitar players. Even with a voting panel of professional guitarists, a Rolling Stone list is going to lean pretty much to the mainstream classic rock side of things.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
23. But couldn't the same be said about some that appeared on the list, like McLaughlin and Fripp?
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 12:43 AM
Mar 2017

They are certainly not mainstream, and largely appeal to other musicians and aficionados.

cemaphonic

(4,138 posts)
30. Possibly - ultimately, that list is the subjective opinion of a bunch of professional guitarists.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 12:22 PM
Mar 2017

Some of it is timing; those two appeared in the late 60s, just at the right time to be key influences on some of the later musicians on the voting panel. I bet if you assembled a voting panel of rock and metal guitarists who started their careers in the late 90s and later, Vai would be on there for sure, and probably some of the others. It would be kind of interesting to see such a list, and see who drops out, and who appears.

And they're not that obscure. My parents have a large, but not especially exotic collection of classic rock albums they bought when they were young that includes both "Bitches Brew" and "In the Court of the Crimson King."

CountAllVotes

(20,868 posts)
3. Glad they included John McLaughlin
Sun Mar 12, 2017, 01:59 PM
Mar 2017

The Mahavishnu Orchestra, one one his many successful creations, contained Carlos Santana at one time. I'm not sure if McLaughlin still plays music with Carlos or not these days but he is still touring.

As to your thoughts on John Lennon, I could not disagree more! He was a skilled guitarist and I sure enjoyed many of his instrumentals and the way he could make a guitar wail and screech like no other person could. The song, "I'm Losing You" is one of many fine examples of this refined skill. He was indeed a genius!






Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
8. I guess I keep wondering where they drew the line with regard to McLaughlin
Sun Mar 12, 2017, 02:43 PM
Mar 2017

For example, if they are including him, why not Al DiMeola?

yuiyoshida

(41,831 posts)
12. Identify the glaring omissions
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 02:25 PM
Mar 2017

Why is it that its ALWAYS ENGLISH AND AMERICAN bands, what happened to other countries? Why don't their musicians count?

Someone once told me, "IF they don't sing in Enlish, the Music MUST SUCK" arrogant much?
give me a break...




AND why does it always have to be MEN?

cemaphonic

(4,138 posts)
13. Probably because the voting panel are mostly American and British musicians
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 06:50 PM
Mar 2017

That and the global reach of of Anglo-American music. It's just what they're familiar with.

cemaphonic

(4,138 posts)
17. There are women on both the voting panel and the list.
Wed Mar 15, 2017, 03:10 PM
Mar 2017

I get the point you are making here. I'm an amateur musician with a young daughter who loves music, so I'm always looking out for good female musicians as role models. And lots of genres do have a fair number of prominent and successful women guitarists. Punk, Bluegrass, contemporary metal, etc. And there are plenty of unknown session pros that could play half of that list under the table.

But this list was made by Rolling Stone staff and a bunch of famous blues/rock guitarists from the 50s-90s, so it's going to lean toward famous rock/blues guitarists of that era. And there just aren't that many women in that category.

yuiyoshida

(41,831 posts)
18. So WHY IS THAT?
Wed Mar 15, 2017, 03:13 PM
Mar 2017

Places like Japan are CHOCK full of female guitarists these days. I guess too many American women were told to SIT DOWN, SHUT UP AND PLAY THAT PIANO!

cemaphonic

(4,138 posts)
19. Well, "these days" is part of the answer
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 12:46 AM
Mar 2017

The vast majority of the names on that list hit their career peak 30-50 years ago. Female guitarists were pretty few and far between in Japanese music until the late 90s too, from what I can tell.

But yeah, guitar and rock culture has historically been pretty unfriendly to female guitarists too. My guitar teacher is a woman, and she has her share of stories about sales and repair staff at music stores flat out not believing that she was buying/repairing guitars for herself instead of a boyfriend. So only the most dedicated and thick-skinned even pursued it as a serious hobby, let alone attempted a professional career.

Anyway, here's one of my current favorites, Courtney Hartman crosspicking like it's the easiest thing in the world:



Also, Molly Tuttle, who is just flippin' incredible:
 

Charles Bukowski

(1,132 posts)
26. Thurston Moore, Kurt Cobain, and Peter Buck
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 03:14 AM
Mar 2017

don't even qualify as great guitarists. Top 100 ever? Lulz.

I'd much rather listen to the Beatles and Ramones over Satriani and Vai, but they're both several tiers above John, George, and Tommy Ramone as skilled axemen. That goes for most on this list frankly.

Baby Boomer guitarists are (to put it mildly) generous represented, so where the hell are Steve Howe, Gary Moore, and Roy Buchanan?

cemaphonic

(4,138 posts)
31. I think all three are defendable in terms of influence
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 01:07 PM
Mar 2017

Which is kind of reflected in the writeups for each entry. It's not just about technical virtuosity.

I follow a bunch of guitar forums, and when beginners are looking for easy songs to learn, "Come As You Are" is almost always among the first suggestions. There's something to be said for simple and accessible, yet catchy and memorable - it's not an easy combination to achieve. I'd rate Cobain a lot higher as a songwriter than guitarist, but I'm not surprised to see him here.

And Peter Buck, along with Johnny Marr are shoe-ins as far as I'm concerned. So many bands from the 80s on have tried to ape their sound it's not even funny.

I'm not sold on Thurston Moore either. He had a pretty unique approach, but a lot of it was taken from his time playing in Glenn Branca's ensembles. Also, not especially influential stylistically, even as popular as Sonic Youth was.

As for the Beatles, I'd agree that John was a solid but not exceptional rhythm player, and doesn't really belong. George Harrison was great though. Cool rockabilly riffs early on, beautiful melodic solos in the last few years of the Beatles, and a really distinctive slide guitar style post-Beatles.

OnDoutside

(19,956 posts)
28. Joke list, Rory Gallagher only at no 57
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 04:37 AM
Mar 2017

‘How does it feel to be the greatest guitarist in the world? I don’t know, go ask Rory Gallagher.’
—Jimi Hendrix

‘Rory’s death really upset me. I heard about it just before we went on stage, and it put a damper
on the evening. I can’t say I knew him that well, but I remember meeting him in our offices
once, and we spent an hour talking. He was such a nice guy and a great player.’ —Jimmy Page

‘So these couple of kids come up, who’s me and my mate, and say ‘How do you get your sound
Mr. Gallagher?’ and he sits and tells us. So I owe Rory Gallagher my sound. ‘ —Brian May

‘Rory’s death is a tragic loss of a great musician and a very good friend.’ —Van Morrison

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
32. OMISSION: STEVE LUKATHER
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 03:58 PM
Mar 2017


1,500 guitar tracks - The GO TO session musician from 1980 on...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Lukather

Here's a little something he riffed on his first take for Lionel Ritchie (forwarded to 4:00 mark):

?t=4m7s
Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»The Rolling Stone top 100...