The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsOne of the biggest regrets in my life
I know I will probably live longer than Dolt45 and one of my biggest regrets is that Hunter S. Thompson will not be around to write his obituary. He would probably out do the one he wrote for Richard Nixon.
A scathing obituary of Richard Nixon, originally published in Rolling Stone on June 16, 1994
Hunter S. Thompson July 1994 Issue
MEMO FROM THE NATIONAL AFFAIRS DESK
DATE: MAY 1, 1994
FROM: DR. HUNTER S. THOMPSON
SUBJECT: THE DEATH OF RICHARD NIXON: NOTES ON THE PASSING OF AN AMERICAN MONSTER.... HE WAS A LIAR AND A QUITTER, AND HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN BURIED AT SEA.... BUT HE WAS, AFTER ALL, THE PRESIDENT.
Richard Nixon is gone now, and I am poorer for it. He was the real thing -- a political monster straight out of Grendel and a very dangerous enemy. He could shake your hand and stab you in the back at the same time. He lied to his friends and betrayed the trust of his family. Not even Gerald Ford, the unhappy ex-president who pardoned Nixon and kept him out of prison, was immune to the evil fallout. Ford, who believes strongly in Heaven and Hell, has told more than one of his celebrity golf partners that "I know I will go to hell, because I pardoned Richard Nixon."
I have had my own bloody relationship with Nixon for many years, but I am not worried about it landing me in hell with him. I have already been there with that bastard, and I am a better person for it. Nixon had the unique ability to make his enemies seem honorable, and we developed a keen sense of fraternity. Some of my best friends have hated Nixon all their lives. My mother hates Nixon, my son hates Nixon, I hate Nixon, and this hatred has brought us together.
<SNIP>
It was Richard Nixon who got me into politics, and now that he's gone, I feel lonely. He was a giant in his way. As long as Nixon was politically alive -- and he was, all the way to the end -- we could always be sure of finding the enemy on the Low Road. There was no need to look anywhere else for the evil bastard. He had the fighting instincts of a badger trapped by hounds. The badger will roll over on its back and emit a smell of death, which confuses the dogs and lures them in for the traditional ripping and tearing action. But it is usually the badger who does the ripping and tearing. It is a beast that fights best on its back: rolling under the throat of the enemy and seizing it by the head with all four claws.
That was Nixon's style -- and if you forgot, he would kill you as a lesson to the others. Badgers don't fight fair, bubba. That's why God made dachshunds.
More, much more: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/07/he-was-a-crook/308699/
Maybe The Ferret will do the honors for those of us here on DU.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,324 posts)csziggy
(34,135 posts)I doubt the country will ever get rid of the taint of Nixon and his successors.
DFW
(54,330 posts)As a member of the Washington print press, he was on the 1959 trip to Russia with Nixon and Eisenhower. Years later, after Nixon's comeback brought him all the way to the White House, my dad was in Mexico with the rest of our family while I was in school in Spain, and saw Canadian PM Pierre Trudeau at the pool at his hotel. My dad went up to him, said he was a Washington reporter, that he had recognized Trudeau, and that he would not interrupt Trudeau's vacation with even one question, even though his paper was in a town on the Canadian border. Trudeau thanked him profusely, and they struck up an informal friendship.
A few months later, there was some big deal on the St. Lawrence Seaway that my dad had to cover, and accompany Nixon up there. Nixon saw Trudeau, brought my Dad over, and trying to play the big host, asked my Dad if he had met the Canadian Prime Minister? My Dad and Trudeau both laughed and said, yes, we know each other. Disappointed that he wasn't controlling the situation, Nixon said, "oh," and slunk away.
csziggy
(34,135 posts)Too many people these days only "remember" what has been presented in the last three months on the internet. They don't have the understanding that decades of accumulated facts provide.
Thank you!
DFW
(54,330 posts)The guys that used to come out to our house on weekends just to chat with him--just obscure names in history books to most people, but living memories to me--Jake Javits, Frank Church, Pierre Salinger, Charlie Gooddell, Dick Reston, I've probably forgotten 90% of them.
csziggy
(34,135 posts)They used to be in/on the news so much!
You should write a biography of your father and then your own autobiography. I bet they would sell.
DFW
(54,330 posts)I'll bet most people under 35 will not, unless they pass by a building named after one of them, or something like that. Lots of people know that there's a Dirksen Senate Office Building. Only a very few know who Everett Dirksen was, let alone met him.
My dad would be horrified at the idea of a biography of himself. He was a true journalist to the end. He considered his job to be to report the news, not to be the news. As for me, I was more like passing through, rather than doing the moving and shaking on my own. I met up with a famous acquaintance one December and we exchanged what we had been doing in the past year. I said, same old stuff for me, and how about you? "Oh," he said, as if he had gone to the store for a jar of pickles, "I was building a couple of cities in China." Now THERE'S a guy whose biography would sell. At age 16, in Barcelona, I once was asked to play music for a reception for Salvador Dalí. He, on the other hand, WAS Salvador Dalí. There's a very good reason biographies get written about guys like him, and not about guys like me
csziggy
(34,135 posts)After all, one of the highlights of my youth was visiting the senator from our state, Spessard Holland, and being escorted by him through the underground passage into the Senate Building. Holland had already been Governor of Florida, then senator for several terms. He was not quite a family friend - his wife was a member of the DAR chapter my grandmother was in.
Maybe it's my interest in genealogy (though I have never been interested in DAR or their politics) that makes me think that ordinary people need to be remembered through biographies. As I am researching families, I look for the stories. That was one thing that my grandmother showed me. She wrote little biographies of the ancestors she had enough information on. Sometimes, the stories have not turned out to be completely true - oral histories can be unreliable - but they are still interesting and provide a depth that bald statistics do not.
So I look for stories and I am trying to get time to write them up on my blog. I'm not getting very far, but it's still fun to attempt.