Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
My Huffpo right-wing talking point takedown: Debt Limit Follies Need to Stop Now
Debt Limit Follies Need to Stop Now
Would the U.S. have defaulted on its debt payments if Congress had refused to raise the debt limit? Probably not right away. But the risks were real and presented a level of danger we should never again inflict upon ourselves.
Conservatives like to say a debt-limit freeze could be manageable. They point out that the government takes in more than enough tax money each month to more than cover the interest on the debt. So, in theory, the government could make "hard choices" to pay bond holders before it pays for other things. It also, theoretically, could have borrowed more money as old debt was retired.
That sounds logical, but it ignores some pesky realities. Those involve serious technical problems, as well as economic and political complications.
Technical problem number one: It is not clear that the U.S. Treasury or the president have the legal authority to prioritize payments in order to put bond holders at the front of the line. So, in order to do that, somebody might have to break the law.
MORE HERE: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-melton/debt-limit-follies-need-to-stop_b_4149318.html?utm_hp_ref=detroit&ir=Detroit
Would the U.S. have defaulted on its debt payments if Congress had refused to raise the debt limit? Probably not right away. But the risks were real and presented a level of danger we should never again inflict upon ourselves.
Conservatives like to say a debt-limit freeze could be manageable. They point out that the government takes in more than enough tax money each month to more than cover the interest on the debt. So, in theory, the government could make "hard choices" to pay bond holders before it pays for other things. It also, theoretically, could have borrowed more money as old debt was retired.
That sounds logical, but it ignores some pesky realities. Those involve serious technical problems, as well as economic and political complications.
Technical problem number one: It is not clear that the U.S. Treasury or the president have the legal authority to prioritize payments in order to put bond holders at the front of the line. So, in order to do that, somebody might have to break the law.
MORE HERE: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-melton/debt-limit-follies-need-to-stop_b_4149318.html?utm_hp_ref=detroit&ir=Detroit
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
that the HuffPo readers aren't as smart as we are. 
Actually, economics turns me off too, but I know that it is important to attempt to understand what is happening. That article was at least easy to follow.