Music Appreciation

BootinUp

(47,139 posts) Tue Oct 5, 2021, 09:17 PM Oct 2021

Stevie Nicks Bob Welch Gold Dust Woman Mick Fleetwood Christine McVie 1981

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Stevie Nicks Bob Welch Gold Dust Woman Mick Fleetwood Christine McVie 1981 (Original Post) BootinUp Oct 2021 OP

FLEETWOOD MAC - complete set - THE MIDNIGHT SPECIAL 1976 BootinUp Oct 2021 #1

RARE: SARA - 11 Minute Long Version - Stevie Nicks - Fleetwood Mac BootinUp Oct 2021 #2

I always thought Casady1 Oct 2021 #3

I wouldn't put it BootinUp Oct 2021 #4

I like this video Casady1 Oct 2021 #5

Cool. BootinUp Oct 2021 #6

Tusk era Mac? They were living on blow AZSkiffyGeek Oct 2021 #7

Oh yeah! dameatball Oct 2021 #8

BootinUp

(47,139 posts)

1. FLEETWOOD MAC - complete set - THE MIDNIGHT SPECIAL 1976

Reply to BootinUp (Original post)

Tue Oct 5, 2021, 09:26 PM

Oct 2021

BootinUp

(47,139 posts)

2. RARE: SARA - 11 Minute Long Version - Stevie Nicks - Fleetwood Mac

Reply to BootinUp (Original post)

Tue Oct 5, 2021, 09:32 PM

Oct 2021

Casady1

(2,133 posts)

3. I always thought

Reply to BootinUp (Original post)

Tue Oct 5, 2021, 09:40 PM

Oct 2021

They look completely coked out in this video.

BootinUp

(47,139 posts)

4. I wouldn't put it

Reply to Casady1 (Reply #3)

Tue Oct 5, 2021, 09:49 PM

Oct 2021

Past them. But their performances were high energy, no? I think that was what made them so good.

Casady1

(2,133 posts)

5. I like this video

Reply to BootinUp (Reply #4)

Tue Oct 5, 2021, 09:58 PM

Oct 2021

Alot. But I think they are really high.

BootinUp

(47,139 posts)

6. Cool.

Reply to Casady1 (Reply #5)

Tue Oct 5, 2021, 10:05 PM

Oct 2021

AZSkiffyGeek

(11,006 posts)

7. Tusk era Mac? They were living on blow

Reply to Casady1 (Reply #3)

Tue Oct 5, 2021, 10:12 PM

Oct 2021

Nice to see them working with Welch though. They did him dirty towards the end of his life.

dameatball

(7,396 posts)

8. Oh yeah!

Reply to BootinUp (Original post)

Tue Oct 5, 2021, 10:29 PM

Oct 2021

Reply to this discussion