Why the Director of 'Anchorman' Decided to Take On Dick Cheney
'With Vice, his biopic of Bushs vice president, Adam McKay completes his journey from S.N.L. writer to fierce critic of the American right.
*What is unambiguous, by the end, is McKays conviction that the American right, in its post-Reagan consolidation of power, has set our country and our planet on a path to ruin and that no single figure illustrates this better than Cheney. He was the expert safecracker who opened up the safe, McKay said, alluding to Cheneys deft dismantling of checks on executive power, and now the orangutan is in there, throwing around the money and the jewels. McKay knows that a conservative backlash to his film is very likely, and while he emphasized how diligently he grounded the film in research, he also argued that making a less confrontational movie, hewing to a measured realism would have felt not only boring but also incommensurate to the task.
Ive never dealt with a tone like this, and I dont think its by accident, McKay said. Were living in a world with a tone that none of us has ever experienced. . .
In Vice, he uses Cheneys life to tell a broader tale about what McKay describes as the Republican revolution and how it changed our country. He sees Cheney as a Zelig-style figure of the right. His career in national politics began in the Nixon administration as a congressional intern and then apprentice to Donald Rumsfeld and, from there, intersected and coincided with the rise of key conservative figures: among them the Fox News founder, Roger Ailes, who first floated the idea for a conservative news network while working for Nixon; right-wing megadonors like the Koch brothers; conservative strategy shops like the Heritage Foundation; and, finally, George W. Bush, over whose administration and over whose decision to invade Iraq after Sept. 11, despite paltry intelligence linking the two Cheney exercised unprecedented influence for a vice president.'>>>
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/29/magazine/adam-mckay-dick-cheney-vice.html?